About Me

Name: Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

"List of every Hawaii hospital confirming: Obama not born here."

FOR THE RECORD: Hospital after Hospital - all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There.    All of these were called or visited from November 20 - December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE AS A FACT!
Hospital employees were bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly.
 Excerpted from: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135
 

Hospitals in Hawaii to Obama: You Were Not Born Here!

Supposed Conspiracy Claim Turns REAL on Obama   Excerpted from: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135

It is becoming painfully obvious that we may very well have a criminal President in 2009.  No this isn’t a joke. What I speak of is the curious developments in the supposedly racist, biased, dumb,  as well as insane case of where Obama was born.  Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate

A strange development indeed is how it is that every time Barack Obama or a family member tells of where Obama was born, they seem to have no idea as of December 2008.

They seemed to know what hospital quite a few times months ago when it was claimed that Obama’s mother gave birth to him at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu - Obama and Mom Never Here

The Queen’s Medical Center
1301 Punchbowl StreetHonolulu, HI 96813  Link to Site
Phone number 808-538-9011 General Medical Records 808-547-4361.

After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there, his sister was in an interview (Mary) and claimed that Obama was born at  Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children - Obama and Mom Never Here 1319 Punahou StreetHonolulu, Hawaii 96826(808) 535-7000  Link to site

Hospital after Hospital - all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There. 

Hospital after hospital in Honolulu all have NO RECORD of Obama or mother ever being there.   Is this some state secret? Are we to believe that even the hospital that he was born in should remain secret? Why lie to us as if it matters I mean the man did win the Presidential vote? Why the lies and secrecy?

We already know that Obama’s family and the entire nation of Kenya (which is about to have a national holiday for Obama) know that Barack Obama was born in Mombasa Coastal Hospital in Kenya. The government of Kenya has sealed these records.  More and more secrecy due to the fact that once proven, Obama will not be constitutionally allowed to become President of the United States!

All of these were called or visited from November 20 - December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE AS A FACT!

Hospital employees were bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly.

Hospitals you can check yourself (Hint on the process: Most of the following Hospitals didn’t exist in Honolulu County at time of Obama’s birth so this was an academic exercise) The main two hospitals claimed that definitely existed are above and both have no record of Obama or Mother Ann in either of them.

We were pretty detailed in our calls and visits thanks to dozens of native Hawaiian patriots! To the College Republicans all over the Island kudos!.   You can look at every hospital here and call or visit any of them.  Everyone has a family member working in a hospital. Talk, pay and bribe. You can file freedom of information acts, you can do everything and anything you wish.  Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.

Only his original that he has sealed will have this info.  Will the Supreme Court force it open and thus preserve the Constitution of the United States?

Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate

Hawaii Issues Birth Certificates to Foreign Born Residents!

Here’s Hawaii saying it like it it. All Doubts Cleared my Friends.

A. From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country (applies to adopted children). 
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8.  A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error.  See, for example, HRS 338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program.  From its web site:  “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”   Excerpted from lengthy article at: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Preface:
"... a "Certification of Live Birth" is what has been released, not a "Certificate of Live Birth". These two are frequently mixed up with each other in the MSM and Blogs, but hopefully not in the Court cases."

A "Certificate of Live Birth" is what would give all of the extra information that is being requested.

They both are abbreviated as COLB and this has lead to a lot of confusion.

The "Certification" can be issued to Foreign born whereas a "Certificate" is not, but a foreign "Certificate" could be on file for Mr. Obama, leading to the statements from Hawaii about one being on file.

This is the famous statement that contained truth, but not the whole truth, from Hawaii officials.
(Go to rightside of my blog here and you may follow the course of (the latest news of Barack Obama's "birth certificate" issue and lawsuits) in the almost daily postings. Lower on the rightside are the Months of the year(s) and you may find additional postings there that apply.)
 
OBAMA'S FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NOT GOING AWAY: STATUS REPORT UPDATE: Every Hawaii hospital confirms: not born here
Excerpted from: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/obamas-forged-b.html#more
Currently, there are 16 cases in 12 states (with 2 before the Supreme Court) contending that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be sworn in as President of the United States.
Click below - lengthy post
Coming out of Chicago, 2 years 9 months ago, a 26 page report on the importance of getting rid of the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution
Quote:
Sarah P. Herlihy is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP http://www.kirkland.com . Note: this law firm is based in Chicago.

Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C. (aka PARTNER), is a Member of the finance committees for both U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.
Not the only partner with ties to their Harvard Senator. Chicago law firm... US Senators for Illinois... yeah, easy link.
Now, we can get into the new affidavits, or testimonies of ambassadors, or forensic experts that go under the psuedonym Dr Ron Polarik, but really, why bother? No one wants to send a guy guilty of forging a US birth certificate to jail for 15 years. Instead, lets focus on how in 2006, Obama's buddies felt it necessary to put together a 26 page dissertation why the "natural born" clause is the "stupidest provision."
Kirkland's specialty?
Quote:
Kirkland & Ellis has a 100-year history of providing exceptional service to clients around the world in complex litigation, corporate and tax, intellectual property, restructuring and counseling matters. The groundwork has been established for another century of superior legal work and client service.
Where do they mention Constitutional law? Perhaps under "Other"...
The story that Atlas broke:
July 4, 2008   EXCLUSIVE: Atlas Tech Expert Declares Obama Birth Certificate Forgery
July 11, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FORENSIC EXPERT: "the [birth] certificate is still a horrible forgery"
July 20, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN
Duo take Obama birth challenge to Court
[§338-17.8]  Certificates for children born out of State. (a)  Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
What Exactly is the Hub Bub Page.(hat tip Larwyn)
 
Andy Martin's case:

Sunday, February 08, 2009

Andy Martin will appeal Obama birth certificate decision to Hawai'i appeals court

The battle to find out "who Barack Obama really is" continues. Martin's lawsuit remains the only litigation in the proper court against the proper officials to secure access to Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.  Read more at: contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2009/02/andy-martin-will-appeal-obama-birth.html
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Supreme Court rejects Obama citizenship case"

"The Supreme Court rejected an attempt Monday to declare Barack Obama ineligible to be president. "

Supreme Court rejects Obama citizenship case

     

By Carrie Budoff Brown

The Supreme Court rejected an attempt Monday to declare Barack Obama ineligible to be president.

The court turned down a long-shot emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who claimed that Obama could not serve as president because he had dual nationality at birth. Since his mother was an American and his Kenyan father was a British subject, he failed to meet the constitutional standard of being a “natural born citizen,” argued Leo Donofrio of East Bunswick, N.J., in his appeal.

The court denied the request without providing an explanation, which is common practice. Donofrio’s suit was one of a few around the country seeking to nullify the election, but his had a noteworthy case history: It was referred to the high court by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court’s only African American.

The suit filed against New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells contested Obama’s claims to citizenship and therefore to the presidency and initially sought to stay the election. Alan Keyes, who was defeated by Obama in a race for the U.S. Senate in 2004, has filed a similar suit. During the campaign, a copy of Obama’s birth certificate was posted on his website, showing that he was born in Hawaii. A petition to stop the Electoral College from confirming Obama as the next president has been rejected by Justice David Souter. (more) Excerpted from: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16300.html

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16300.html

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Supreme Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

"The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth."  AP   20 minutes ago
 

Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

20 mins ago  Excerpted from Yahoo News

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama ... (More)   Excerpted from:

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

(Video)Supreme Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

"The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth."
 

Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve   (Yahoo News)

  • WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg'... more  (Excerpted from Yahoo News 15 minutes ago)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Obama The Trojan Horse" Natural Born Citizen? Will He Perjure Himself Taking Presidential Oath?

  • "If Obama takes the Presidential oath, knowing that he is not a natural born Citizen, "he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing. So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the oath, Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it."
  • If the Oath is perjured, "Obama's every subsequent act in the usurped Office of President will be a criminal offense...."
  • If he is indeed a usurper, "Obama will not constitutionally be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States....therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces."
  •  
     
    Obama The Trojan Horse
    December 3, 2008
    by Joan Swirsky

    In Virgil's epic poem, the Aeneid, the story is told of Odysseus's plot to conquer Troy, thus ending 10 years of defeat for the Greeks. The Greeks' plan was to trick the citizens of Troy (the Trojans) into believing that the giant wooden horse they had constructed was a gift from the goddess Athena. They left their "gift" outside the city and withdrew their troops and ships, the better to convince the Trojans of their benevolent intentions.


    At first wary and suspicious, the Trojans came out from behind their walls to inspect the enormous horse. Once outside, they met a man named Sinon, who gained their trust by telling them that he had escaped from the murderous Greek regime He was so credible that when he suggested to the Trojans that they bring the wooden horse inside the city, they did. But unbeknownst to the trusting Trojans, Sinon was a secret agent of the Greeks.

    Once inside the city, the Greek warriors, under cover of darkness, emerged from hiding inside the horse and quickly opened the gates of Troy to allow the rest of the Greek armies to invade the city, whereupon they promptly slaughtered the Trojan men, enslaved the women and children, and completely destroyed the city of Troy.

    The colossal ruse of the Trojan Horse - which resulted in the downfall of the great and mighty city of Troy - is similar to the ruse that increasing numbers of Americans believe Barack Obama has effected with his election to the presidency, specifically that the "warriors" of his campaign - including his longtime radical associates, a leftist media and a now-silenced conservative media, as well as far-left organizations like ACORN, et al. - have fooled a largely-gullible electorate into believing that the man who offered "hope" and "change" meant something quite different than they were led to believe.

    Contrast Virgil's poem to what is happening today. In the liberals' epic scheme, the story is about conquering Republicans, thus ending almost 10 years of electoral defeat.

    The liberals' plan was to trick the citizens of the United States into believing that their moderate-toned, multi-racial candidate was a gift to America, a way to expiate their collective guilt over racial discrimination and "heal the wounds" that, in their view, our big bad country was guilty of inflicting. They and their media lapdogs presented this "gift" with grandiose language and warm-and-fuzzy images, the better to convince the electorate of his benevolent intentions.  

    At first wary, Americans ultimately bought the media hype. Once they took a closer look, however, they were introduced to many Sinons - Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, Louis Farrakhan, et al. But the "gift" assured them that he was being victimized by these people, and so the American people bought the "victim" thing and rewarded him with the nomination to be president.

    Once Obama became the putative president-elect, his minions emerged not under cover of darkness but in broad daylight, expressing their full intentions to follow his lead in converting America into their dreamed-of Socialist paradise, complete with nationalized banks, healthcare, the auto industry, etc.; the reinstatement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine, which would effectively annihilate all dissenting opinion; the institution of a domestic police force which has eerie echoes to the repressive goon squads of the Russian empire and other Communist and Socialist regimes; bringing about the massive redistribution of wealth, and spitting in the face of our most precious founding document, the U.S. Constitution.

    Obama's hope, it is now apparent, is for a "globalist" America. And his change, it is now apparent, is the polar opposite of free-market capitalism, a free press, freedoms of religion, assembly, etc., any semblance of respect for the United States Constitution, and, who knows, a resurrection of his revolutionary Marxist black liberation theology to replace the Judeo-Christian tenets upon which our country was founded.

    "The most noticeable characteristic of Obama," says Dr. Kate, in a chilling article entitled The Trojan Candidate, "is his profound lack of respect for America as shown with his behavior on the flag pin, the failure to observe decorum regarding the national anthem, the fake presidential seal, the printed announcement of his speech in Germany, the upside down flag on the tickets and behind Biden at the Convention, his airplane with painted-over American flag, and his detached and callous appearance at Ground Zero. By this behavior, Obama is mocking America, cheapening its decorum and symbols."

    Dr, Kate reminds her readers that it was one of Obama's role models, Saul Alinsky, who wrote Rules for Radicals and who believed that change "meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it."

    She further asks why Obama's close friend, the unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers, would quote the following poem in his blog just two months before the election. :

    The end of an empire is messy at best
    And this empire is ending
    Like all the rest
    Like the Spanish Armada adrift on the sea
    We're adrift in the land of the brave
    And the home of the free
    Goodbye. Goodbye. Goodbye

    "Do you think he knows something, or hopes for something that we don't?" she asks. "Obama is not who he says he is...I also wonder about his Manchurian Candidate characteristics. What is inside this Trojan Horse? Who is he a front for?"

    WHERE THINGS STAND NOW

    As I've written in five articles (which can be read on my website: http://www.joanswirsky.com/), the most crucial issue is the fact that Obama's eligibility to be president is being seriously challenged by about 20 lawsuits, many of them waged by Democrats and Independents. Several of these suits have now reached the Supreme Court. They all claim that Obama does not meet one of the three criteria that the U.S. Constitution requires of anyone who runs for the presidency of the United States of America. That criterion is that he or she be a "natural born citizen" of the United States.

    December 1, writes attorney Thomas J. Latino, was "the deadline for the Obama legal team to file their response to the Berg Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. There was nothing. Mr. Obama has done what hasn't been done before...he] has blatantly ignored a request from the Supreme Court of the United States - our highest and most revered legal institution. Mr. Obama, quite frankly, has thumbed his nose at the highest court in our land."


    On December 5, Leo Donofrio, a plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, is scheduled to have his case heard by the nine Justices of the Supreme Court, who have agreed to hold a "Rule of Four" Conference. This means If four of the nine Justices agree that Donofrio's case has merit, there is the potential for the Justices to issue a "stay" of the Electoral College vote on December 15, which would prevent the Electoral College members from casting their votes until this explosive issue has been resolved.

    CONSPIRACY THEORIES

    In one of my articles, I noted that it was not unexpected that the liberal media - who have been shilling for Obama for over two years - have covered up his shady, anti-American and anti-Semitic associations, his über-far-left voting record, and his questionable eligibility to be president. But it amazed me that conservative media hosts, who pride themselves on independence and probing inquiries, have been totally mute in covering this issue. Here is what I wrote:

    I speculated that President Bush might have received highly credible evidence from our enemies that they had a number of devastating (probably nuclear suitcase) weapons - set up and ready to be activated in as many as six-to-10 of our major cities - unless he had his functionaries direct all media outlets to steer clear of the birth certificate issue or face Draconian consequences.


    In literally hundreds of e-mails I received, there were other theories I found intriguing.

    • One said to "follow the money," that conservative media honchos had been threatened with massive boycotts from the ACORN crowd to go after their advertisers. Money talks!
    • A graphic designer suggested that George Soros dipped into his billions and "treated" major media people to a cool $5 million each.
    • Another person suggested that the birth certificate "crisis" was a deliberate act on Obama's part to change the U.S. Constitution, the better to enable foreign leadership to someday take charge of America and allow the Globalists to run our county and establish their New World Order.
    • Writer Michael Bresciani even suggested that the media's "fear of embarrassment" may be at play. "He won a landslide...the idea is that winning is more important than keeping the rules...The next time a whistle blows on the field in a NFL game, won't the whole game stop in its tracks and wait for the announcement of the referee? Isn't [the Obama Constitutional question] a far more grave matter than a flag going down in a football game?"
    • Someone else suggested that the Democrats were holding the "Fairness Doctrine" gun to the heads of major radio station owners, striking a deal in which the Doctrine would not be revived if they collectively cooperated in avoiding the birth certificate story.

    But the most compelling "conspiracy theory" came from a woman in California, who wrote:

    "I don't think it's about pay-offs to this or that power-that be that accounts for the media blackout. This could never explain the article in the Wall St. Journal by the staunchly dependable conservative James Taranto, who scoffed at the birth certificate issue. Or why Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Ingraham and all the others, including Hugh Hewitt, have avoided this issue. Or why conservative radio icons Al Rantel and Tammy Bruce have so quickly done an about-face, even screeching and threatening their call-in audience never to mention the birth-certificate issue. In fact Bruce seemed to experience a personality alteration by declaring loudly and angrily that if any bloggers on her site posted any material whatsoever that alluded to Obama's birth certificate, they would be permanently banned from TammyBruce.com.

    "To me, it's reminiscent of the `German thing' - where ordinary, proud, conservative, responsible Germans suddenly realized that their livelihoods and perhaps their lives depended upon supporting a powerful `new order.' It was none other than Josef Goebbels who said that the way to take over a country by a relatively minute cabal of fascists was to gain control of two entities: the media and the armed forces. That's why we heard Obama promise to establish a national police force that was just as strong and well- funded and powerful as the U.S. military. He and his cabal know that they can't turn the U.S. military, so they're going to try to set up their own Gestapo.

    "I suspect," she continued, "that a memo went out en masse to the media from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) not to mention the birth certificate subject under penalty of losing their licenses to broadcast. Now we have practically a national shutdown of the media, and the only entity that would have had the power to bring this about is the FCC - and not a Saudi who owns six percent of Fox News! For the entire airwaves, in unison, to suddenly take the position that Obama's birth certificate is out of bounds means that they've been ordered not to discuss it.

    "Think about it...every single one of the major radio hosts rebuked callers at the same time - and on the same day in most cases! My guess is that big guns from ACORN and also from the Nation of Islam have gotten to the FCC and have told them in no uncertain terms that if Obama is blocked from becoming POTUS, there will be hell to pay all over America. And obviously these threats were deemed credible enough by those making the decisions at the FCC that they have succeeded. This is nothing less than a political coup d'état! Unless, that is, the Justices of the Supreme Court and the Electors of the Electoral College still take seriously their oaths to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution."

    Interesting, I must add, that while the American media have for the most part blacked-out this explosive story, none-other than Pravda has been covering it!

    WHAT LIES AHEAD

    According to legal scholar Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., "America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is `a natural born Citizen' of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship - or he must step down as the Democratic Party's candidate for President of the United States-preferably before the election is held, and in any event before the Electoral College meets....the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders." Vieira further explains:

    • If Obama fails to prove his citizenship but the voters, the Electors, or the Members of the House purport to "elect" him, Dr. Vieira says, "he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation."
    • If Obama takes the Presidential oath, knowing that he is not a natural born Citizen, "he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing. So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the oath, Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it."
    • If the Oath is perjured, "Obama's every subsequent act in the usurped Office of President will be a criminal offense...."
    • If he is indeed a usurper, "Obama will not constitutionally be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States....therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces."
    • If he is indeed a usurper, "Obama will have no conceivable authority to make Treaties, or to nominate, and appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States..."
    • "Congress can pass no law while a usurper pretends to occupy the Office of President. Thus, if Obama deceitfully enters office as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as `President.'"
    • "If Obama does become a usurper posturing as the President, Congress cannot even impeach him because not being the actual President he cannot be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors...In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him - with physical force, if he would not go along quietly - in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture."
    • "If the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be the President and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux tenure in office by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office."

    (more)

    Joan Swirsky (http://www.joanswirsky.com/) is a New York based author and journalist who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Supreme Court Clerk Quarantines Obama (Birth Certificate) Lawsuit

    "As is his right, Cort resubmitted to Justice Scalia. This filing is an emergency stay application and should have been addressed immediately. Instead, and this is beyond outrageous: someone inside the Supreme Court referred Cort's overnight mail package for anthrax testing! "
     
     
    SCOTUS Clerk quarantines Obama lawsuit
    THE RADIO PATRIOT ^ | Dec. 3, 2008 | Andrea Shea King Joan Swirsky's article can be read in its entirety here.

    December 03, 2008

    Tune in tonight at 9 ET to discuss this - The Andrea Shea King show

    On last night's radio program, writer Joan Swirsky brought us up to date with many of the 20 lawsuits that have been filed with the courts, petitioning them to order the various Secretaries of State to delay the casting of electoral votes until Obama produces his original birth certificate, proving once and for all that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.

    Link here to listen to that program.

    Today, she sent this in an email -- with very disturbing news about two of the suits:

    Rense.com Exclusive By Devvy Kidd 12-2-8

    Leo Donofrio called me on December 1, 2008, with more news regarding treachery inside the U.S. Supreme Court. These lawsuits are challenging Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president of these united States of America.

    For those unfamiliar with Leo and his lawsuit docketed at the U.S. Supreme Court, please see this news item:

    http://www.rense.com/general84/scotus.htm

    At the time Leo provided me with the update in the link above, he also informed me there was another case out of Connecticut that he was assisting on and would let me know the details soon. This is the case:

    Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Secretary of the State of Connecticut - http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b docket no. 08A469 http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

    Leo informed me by phone that he wrote the 39 page brief for Cort. It was submitted to the Supreme Court and (no surprise) rejected by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Perhaps she was asleep when it came across her desk, as that seems to be how she spends her time serving the people of this nation: asleep on the bench.

    As is his right, Cort resubmitted to Justice Scalia. This filing is an emergency stay application and should have been addressed immediately. Instead, and this is beyond outrageous: someone inside the Supreme Court referred Cort's over night mail package for anthrax testing!

    To say Leo was beyond words in expressing himself over this insanity is an under statement. Leo explained that Cort Wrotnowski is the quintessential example of the average American: married, two children, owns his own health food store and access to any anthrax by Cort is impossible. Not only is it impossible, the idea is preposterous and nothing but a smokescreen.

    Why would a clerk do such a thing? We have to remember that Leo's case will be conferenced by all nine supreme court justices, December 5, 2008. Make no mistake about it: this is history in the making. The electoral college votes December 15, 2008. A massive drive has been underway for weeks to reach out to the electoral college delegates in the 35 affected states with the facts about Obama the mystery man.

    Cort's case should have been enjoined with Leo's and under 'normal' circumstances would be - except for the continued interference by clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court. Leo and Cort were informed by the PIO (Public Information Officer) at the Supreme Court that the anthrax testing process would take nine days. Perfect timing to foil enjoining of the two cases.

    Leo lamented in his frustration that he simply cannot believe what has been happening over these lawsuits. "This is the U.S. Supreme Court we're talking about," said Leo. "This is where the American people go for justice and look at what is happening!"

    Indeed. These events involving Barack Hussein Obama and his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution to serve as president is historical and has never happened in our life time. Not only is the prostitute media ignoring this issue of paramount importance, now the supreme court justices are being manipulated. Outrageous doesn't even begin to cover such chicanery.

    Leo has asked me to please get this information published as soon as possible. Ladies and gentlemen: What we are seeing in Washington, DC, is a mockery of everything this country has stood for and what we will stand for in the future. As Leo said, these justices are going to determine the next president of these united States of America. We the people are being short changed by obliviously politically driven non elected personnel inside the Supreme Court. We cannot remain silent.

    Is Obama trying to make an end-run around the Constitution? Why has this issue gone ignored?

    Joan has written six articles about this Constitutional issue, the most recent published today. In it, she compares what's happened in this election with Virgil's epic poem, the Aeneid, the story of Odysseus's plot to conquer Troy, thus ending 10 years of defeat for the Greeks. The Greeks' plan was to trick the citizens of Troy (the Trojans) into believing that the giant wooden horse they had constructed was a gift from the goddess Athena. They left their "gift" outside the city and withdrew their troops and ships, the better to convince the Trojans of their benevolent intentions.

    In this stunning piece, Joan includes a theory offered one of her readers:

    "I don't think it's about pay-offs to this or that power-that be that accounts for the media blackout. This could never explain the article in the Wall St. Journal by the staunchly dependable conservative James Taranto, who scoffed at the birth certificate issue. Or why Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Ingraham and all the others, including Hugh Hewitt, have avoided this issue. Or why conservative radio icons Al Rantel and Tammy Bruce have so quickly done an about-face, even screeching and threatening their call-in audience never to mention the birth-certificate issue. In fact Bruce seemed to experience a personality alteration by declaring loudly and angrily that if any bloggers on her site posted any material whatsoever that alluded to Obama's birth certificate, they would be permanently banned from TammyBruce.com.

    "To me, it's reminiscent of the `German thing' - where ordinary, proud, conservative, responsible Germans suddenly realized that their livelihoods and perhaps their lives depended upon supporting a powerful `new order.' It was none other than Josef Goebbels who said that the way to take over a country by a relatively minute cabal of fascists was to gain control of two entities: the media and the armed forces. That's why we heard Obama promise to establish a national police force that was just as strong and well- funded and powerful as the U.S. military. He and his cabal know that they can't turn the U.S. military, so they're going to try to set up their own Gestapo.

    "I suspect," she continued, "that a memo went out en masse to the media from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) not to mention the birth certificate subject under penalty of losing their licenses to broadcast. Now we have practically a national shutdown of the media, and the only entity that would have had the power to bring this about is the FCC - and not a Saudi who owns six percent of Fox News! For the entire airwaves, in unison, to suddenly take the position that Obama's birth certificate is out of bounds means that they've been ordered not to discuss it.

    "Think about it...every single one of the major radio hosts rebuked callers at the same time - and on the same day in most cases! My guess is that big guns from ACORN and also from the Nation of Islam have gotten to the FCC and have told them in no uncertain terms that if Obama is blocked from becoming POTUS, there will be hell to pay all over America. And obviously these threats were deemed credible enough by those making the decisions at the FCC that they have succeeded. This is nothing less than a political coup d'état! Unless, that is, the Justices of the Supreme Court and the Electors of the Electoral College still take seriously their oaths to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution."  Excerpted
     
     
    Obama The Trojan Horse
    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    Leo Donofrio was on the Plains Radio internet show on Dec. 1 — good interview. Link here to listen.

    http://www.plainsradio.com/show/Voice%201-1-08a.mp3

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    08 PREZ ELECTION CHALLENGE UPDATE: DONOFRIO V. WELLS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DEC. 5, 2008 BY THE FULL US SUPREME COURT

    "Why would OBAMA spend $800.000.00 to avoid showing the Certificate if it were valid?" tess aghee
     

    CONFIRMED BY SCOTUS: DONOFRIO V. WELLS WAS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DECEMBER 5, 2008 BY THE FULL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

    Excerpted from: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/confirmed-by-scotus-donofrio-v-wells-was-distributed-for-conference-of-december-5-2008-by-the-full-united-states-supreme-court/#commentsDecember 1, 2008 by naturalborncitizen

    [UPDATE] Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski will be on Plains Radio tonight at 7:00 PM EST

    CONFIRMED BY SCOTUS: DONOFRIO V. WELLS WAS DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF DECEMBER 5, 2008 BY THE FULL UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AFTER FIRST HAVING BEEN REFERRED TO THE COURT BY JUSTICE THOMAS

    by Bob Vernon, Honest American News - Plains Radio Network

    December 1, 2008

    On November 19, 2008, the official United States Supreme Court Docket for case number 08A407 - Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey - was updated to show that the “emergency stay application” to halt the national election and Electoral College meeting of 2008… was “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.”  At that time, it was not clear whether this was scheduled for conference by Justice Thomas alone or by the full Court.

    In multiple interviews with Leo C. Donofrio, this reporter and other members of the Plains Radio Network, were informed by Mr. Donofrio that he suspected the distribution for conference was an action taken by more than Justice Thomas alone.  Mr. Donofrio suggested that another docket update stating the emergency application was referred to the full court by Justice Thomas should have appeared on the docket prior to the distribution for conference.

    Since the docket did not reflect a prior referral it was widely accepted that the distribution for conference was an act of Justice Thomas alone. Honest American News can now confirm - by direct contact with the Supreme Court’s Public Information Office - that the distribution for conference of DONOFRIO V. WELLS was an action taken by the full court.

    On November 28, 2008, the docket for case number 08A407 was updated to show, retroactively, that Justice Clarence Thomas did in fact refer Donofrio’s emergency stay application to the full court on November 19, 2008.  Last night in an interview with…Plains Radio Network, Mr. Donofrio suggested that this new update, nine days later, indicated that the full Court had taken action to distribute the case for conference.  Mr. Donofrio cited a SCOTUS public information document issued to reporters entitled:

    A REPORTER’S GUIDE TO APPLICATIONS Pending Before The Supreme Court of the United States

    http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/reportersguide.pdf

    In that document, on page 3, it advises:

    “The Circuit Justice may act on an application alone or refer it to the full Court for consideration. The fact that an application has been referred to the full Court may not be known publicly until the Court acts on the application and the referral is noted in the Court’s order.”

    Mr. Donofrio pointed out in various interviews that since his case had been made public by the SCOTUS, there was probably a referral by Justice Thomas prior to the actual distribution for conference.  Mr. Donofrio was correct.

    Today I spoke with Patricia McCabe Estrada, Deputy Director of Public Information at the United States Supreme Court.  She informed me that Mr. Donofrio’s application was first referred to the full Court by Justice Clarence Thomas on November 19, 2008.  After that referral took place the full Court, and not Justice Thomas alone, distributed the application for an emergency stay for Conference of December 5, 2008.

    Let me reiterate the main point: DONOFRIO V. WELLS was distributed for conference of December 5, 2008 by the full Court after a prior referral of the application by Justice Thomas.

    Mr. Donofrio will be on the Plains Radio Network tonight.  See Plainsradio.com for details.

    Bob Vernon
    Honest American News
    Plains Radio Network
    State: Texas
     
    tess aghee Says:

    I am an 80 year old woman. I’ve been around a long time
    but I always thought I had “..some rights..”
    With the advent of the Democrats and OBAMA I feel that
    my rights were taken away from me.
    The main media refuses to even mention that the man who
    the Democrats touted for president is not eligible for the
    job. He is not an ‘natural born citizen’.
    He is an elitist that refuses to allow a view of his
    “…Birth Certificate..”
    He refuses to mention anything about the fact
    that we know he is ineligible.
    He has bought off all the major politicians so
    that no one will mention his background.

    Now, in my waning years I fear for my children and my
    wonderful grandchildren. What will happen when Senator
    Barack OBAMA has finished shredding our CONSTITUTION?

    How many times was I told this was a “Nation of Laws”
    and how many times did I repeat it to my children. It
    was great to mention it when I disciplined my kids. I
    pointed out that the country had laws just as I had laws in our home. You were honest with one another and you always did your homework. You never laid your blame on someone else. That home Constitution worked because our country’[s worked so well.

    Tell me - Why would OBAMA spend $800.000.00 to avoid showing the Certificate if it were valid?
    Tell me - Who vetted the man? I have read on the
    internet that he was vetted and is eligible but no one will admit to having vetted him. (Are they afraid of TREASON)?     Excerpted from: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/confirmed-by-scotus-donofrio-v-wells-was-distributed-for-conference-of-december-5-2008-by-the-full-united-states-supreme-court/#comments

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Supreme Court To Review Obama’s Citizenship"

     "Donofrio then presented it to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who put it on the court docket for a conference on December 5. If four of the nine justices decide to hear the case, then full oral arguments will be scheduled."


    Supreme Court to Review Obama's Citizenship  (Latest Obama BC Investigation Links From "Death By 1000 Papercuts" Below Articles)
    By Glenn Church | Related entries in Barack

    It looks like the Barack Obama citizenship issue will not die until he is inaugurated. It probably will not end even then.

    Now the U.S. Supreme Court will discuss the matter in private because one justice decided it was worthy. Before fingering the member of our highest court, I will give a little background information on the case. If you do not think too hard about it, you can probably guess which Supreme Court Justice is responsible.

    Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed suit against Nina Wells, the New Jersey Secretary of State, claiming that she had not performed her duty to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.

    Donofrio originally asked a state court to review the citizenship of Barack Obama, John McCain and Roger Calero. Calero was the Socialist Worker’s Party Presidential candidate. He was born in Venezuela. That is a cut and dry case.

    John McCain was born in Panama but on an American military base. Legal scholars believe birth on an American military base qualifies as a “natural-born citizen.”  A “natural-born citizen” is one of the requirements to be President.

    For Obama, it is the old born in Kenya story again. Anyone who doubts that Obama was not born in Hawaii, please refer to Politifact and Factcheck investigations. Hawaii does not allow birth records to be publicly viewed. This is why no one can go in and see the certificate. It is not because Obama is hiding them, or they were never there. Read this article from Foolocracy if you want more information.

    Anyway, after Donofrio’s case was rejected at the state level, he presented it to Supreme Court Justice David Souter who rejected it. Donofrio then presented it to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who put it on the court docket for a conference on December 5. If four of the nine justices decide to hear the case, then full oral arguments will be scheduled.

    Now it is possible Thomas wants to review Calero’s eligibility as a Presidential candidate. There are plenty of acceptable reasons for this. However, the timing, 10 days before the Electoral College meets, only gives hope and ammunition for those who believe Barack Obama has conspired to create the greatest hoax in world history — that he and his family have been hiding his Kenyan citizenship since he was a few days old so he could run for President.

    Gee, thanks, Clarence Thomas.

    By the way, for those still questioning Obama’s and McCain’s citizenship qualifications, al-Qaeda did fly planes into the Twin Towers, aliens have not abducted millions of people for medical experiments, and the moon is not made of cheese.

    Here is the Supreme Court docket. You can see the real thing here.

    (from Foolocracy.com)
     
     

    President-elect Obama, "Prove your eligibility for office", say 26,500 petitioners.

    "Kenyan Ambassador Peter Ogego: "Barack Obama was born in Kenya!" Comment at: Obama’s Birth Certificate Challenger Keeps Going (below) See videos and more here at this website and see how the lawsuits began and have developed too.
     November 2008 

    Obama: Sad Clown Caricature of "Leadership"

    Without leverage, the clever folk around Barack Obama are fleas without a dog. None of them invented anything, introduced an important new product, opened a new market, or did anything that reached into the lives of ordinary people. They wore expensive cufflinks, read balance sheets, exercised regularly, sat on philanthropic boards, and assumed that their flea's ride on the Reagan dog would last forever.
    Watching Barak Obama in press conference is an exercise in amused and tolerant disgust. With every attempt to answer a question, Obama's lack of depth and absence of solidity become clearer.

    The American voter, it seems, cannot distinguish between persons of depth and experience, and persons who only look good giving prepared speeches to adoring crowds. Obama has no substance, and it is beginning to show.

    The size of national and international problems that Obama will have to address is staggering. Never has it been so important for the leader of the world hegemon to be prepared for anything, than at the present. And then the dupes elect Obama. Buckle up!
    Failed financiers run the Obama transition team. It used to be that the heads of great industrial companies got the top Cabinet posts. Now it is the one-trick wizards....For a quarter of a century, the inbred products of the Ivy League puppy mills have known nothing but a rising trend in asset prices. About the origin of this trend, they were incurious....Now that the stock market has collapsed, the private equity strategies cannot repay their debt, and their returns have evaporated.

    All they knew was leverage, and now that the world is de-levering, they are trying to put leverage back into the system.
    Obama is all about political leverage, in the same way that his pre-failed cabinet picks are all about economic and ... (more)    Excerpted from: http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-sad-clown-caricature-of.html
     Obama Scores A's in Politics, Flunks Leader Test: Kevin Hassett

    Commentary by Kevin Hassett


     

    Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) -- A politician is a person who says one thing, does the opposite, and fails to acknowledge the contradiction. A leader is a person who does the right thing, no matter the consequences.

    Every president must decide, on balance, which he will be.

    When you look back at past presidents, the most successful ones, like Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, often led regardless of the political risks.

    The less successful ones, like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, operated without any clear compass and sailed with the political winds. Bush, for example, flip-flopped from tax-cutting conservative to prescription-drug peddler, all with an eye toward building a permanent majority. (He was right about the majority part, but he got the party wrong.)

    Let's assume that most politicians want history to view them as leaders. As Barack Obama is already finding out, it isn't easy. We are already learning a good deal about his leadership style, and for those hungering for a post-partisan direction, his performance has been disappointing.

    Take the proposed bailout of the U.S. auto manufacturers, a policy that has been tirelessly advocated by the president-elect and sadly seems to be gaining support from enough members of both parties to have a chance of passage.

    Economics 101 suggests that the government shouldn't bail out the automakers. They are saddled with enormously high costs relative to the competition and have been unable to deliver a product that is attractive enough to earn big markups and make up the difference.

    Creative Destruction

    When the manufacturer of a product has trouble in the marketplace, it needs to change its product or its cost structure, and government intervention can only slow the adjustment process. The fastest and most efficient path to economic growth is through the reorganization that generally occurs in bankruptcy.

    So what arguments might cause one to reject the Economics 101 answer? The first is that there will be a contagion if the U.S. automakers enter bankruptcy. They are too big to fail.

    This analysis is indefensible. Firms operate in bankruptcy all the time. The airlines seem to do it as a matter of habit. Forcing the unions and automakers to make tough choices in bankruptcy court isn't the same as shutting down the factories. Factories usually continue to operate in such circumstances. And if a few plants are shut, it will allocate workers and resources toward more efficient uses. That is a plus, not a minus.

    The Little Guy

    The second argument in favor of the bailout is that it serves social justice. In this view, Washington politicians are here to fight for the little guy, and now is their chance. Those poor blue-collar workers in Detroit didn't have a voice in Washington, and now they do.

    This argument is worse than the first. The U.S. automakers are hemorrhaging money, it's true, and a big reason they are doing so is they are shoveling it out the door to the workers.

    Times are tough, and people all over the country have been losing their jobs. When an auto worker at one of the U.S. automakers who has worked at least 10 years loses his job, he gets a severance payment of $140,000. Most everybody else in the U.S. gets a minimal severance or nothing.

    And those who don't lose their jobs are compensated richly. The average cost of an hour of United Auto Worker member work is about $73. The average cost for an hour of work for a Honda Motor Co. worker in the U.S. is about $43.

    Higher Pay

    Some of those higher costs are attributable to the great retirement benefits that are provided to UAW members, who on average have a retirement that is about twice as comfy as the typical senior relying upon Social Security.

    Even excluding the rich benefits, a typical Chrysler assembly worker had an annual salary of $64,100 in 2006, compared with $49,568 for the average American household. Including benefits, the UAW worker is solidly encamped in the upper third of the income distribution.

    Bailout proposals all have the effect of fueling this gravy train for the auto workers. It is difficult to see how anyone could claim that this serves social justice. If you take general revenue, which is collected from everyone in the U.S., and transfer it to high-salaried auto workers, then you aren't serving social justice; you are subverting it.

    Why would anyone propose such a thing? It might be that the proponents of the bailout are just mistaken about the first point and believe that bankruptcy is death, that a systemic economic calamity will follow if the automakers enter Chapter 11. Or they might not have understood the distributional consequences of their actions.

    Simple Explanation

    But it seems unlikely that President-elect Obama, surrounded as he is with brilliant economists, could have missed this point. The auto bailout is political payback, pure and simple.

    After all, the Center for Responsive Politics reports that organized labor contributed a sum of $58 million during the 2008 election cycle to both parties. Republicans picked up $4.85 million; Democrats got $53 million. ... (More) Excerpted from: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=amI2XKsFI0bI&refer=home

    (Kevin Hassett, director of economic-policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, is a Bloomberg News columnist. He was an adviser to Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona in the 2008 presidential election. The opinions expressed are his own.)    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=amI2XKsFI0bI&refer=home

    Last Updated: November 24, 2008 00:02 EST
     

    Question

    ALSO at DBKP:
    The Obama Birth Certificate Questions

    * Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Story Heats up at World Net Daily
    * Obama Birth Certificate, Citizenship: SCOTUS Conference Scheduled for Dec 5
    * Obama Records: Obama Campaign Still Refuses to Release Medical, Other Records
    * Obama Birth Certificate: Ruling in Berg v. Obama Expected In Next Two Days- UPDATED
    * Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit: Obama, DNC Fail to Respond-UPDATED
    * Washington Man Files Lawsuit over Obama Citizenship Questions
    * Obama College, Medical, Birth Records: Who is Barack Obama?
    * Obama Birth Certificate Federal Lawsuit: Video Released On YouTube
    * Obama Birth Certificate Federal Lawsuit: Updates, News and Reactions
    * Obama Birth Certificate Federal Lawsuit: The Curious Behavior of the Obama Campaign
    * Obama, Bill Ayers, and FactCheck.Org: All Have Ties To Annenberg Foundation


    1. World Net Daily has really ramped up their coverage of the Obama birth certificate issue today. WND’s front page contains almost nothing else but stories on the matter. Such as:
      *
      Rathergate II: Certification of Live Birth a clear forgery
      * Proofin’ the prez: Who’s in charge? Constitutional lawyer says electors have duty to investigate citizenship
      *
      Obama’s birthplace heats up Liddy show
      * Is he or isn’t he? The debate over Obama’s eligibility

       

      World Net Daily is the home to Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of Obama Nation, and a visitor to Kenya who was ejected from the country quickly upon arriving weeks ago.

      Does World Net Daily have something that it is about to break on this story?

      We don’t know. But we notice things.

    2. The Kenyan Ambassador.

      Earlier today we provided a link to a video of the Kenyan ambassador stating that Barack Obama’s birthplace in Kenya is already getting plenty of visitors since he became president. [MORNING INTELL: Kenya, Iran, Israel, PC Nazis, Natalie Holloway]

      This slip–or not–of the tongue, combined with Justice Clarence Thomas’ conference scheduled for December 5 on Denofrio v. Wells, has added fuel to the Obama citizenship fire.  (MORE) Excerpted from: http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/11/obama-birth-certificate-wnd-kenya-and-african-press-internatl/

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Latest Lawsuits On Obama's Birth Certificate, Selective Service Record Questions

     "The petition is a request for the Superior Court of California in Sacramento County to issue a peremptory writ barring Secretary of State Debra Bowen "from both certifying to the governor the names of the California Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until such documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain."

     

    It continues with a request for a writ barring California's electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until  documentary proof is produced."   (From article below) 

     
    'Constitutional crisis' looming over Obama's birth location

    Alan Keyes lawsuit warns America may see 'usurper' in Oval Office


    Posted: November 14, 2008
    8:40 pm Eastern

    By Bob Unruh
    © 2008 WorldNetDaily

     

    Alan Keyes
    Alan Keyes

    The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

    The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural-born citizen," a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

    WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

    The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn't ordered it made available to settle the rumors...


    (Snips)

    The "certificate of live birth" posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.

    "Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence," the document said. "The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him."

    The case also raises the circumstances of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama's mother having given up his U.S. citizenship.

    Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-born."

    "Based on all of the above, it is the duty of the SOS to obtain proper documentation of Senator Obama's citizenship to confirm his eligibility for the office or the President of the United States," the case said.

    (Story continues at http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80931))
     
    (See Supreme Court of the United States Gives Obama Until December 1 to Respond...(below)
     
    This Story From Another Source:

    Fenton, MI – November 14, 2008

    Presidential candidate Alan Keyes, vice-presidential candidate Wiley S. Drake, and the Chairman of the American Independent Party, Markham Robinson, have filed suit in California Superior Court in Sacramento seeking to bar Secretary of State Debra Bowen from certifying to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger the names of Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a “natural born” citizen of the United States, and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain.

    In addition, they have asked that the court issue a peremptory writ barring Senator Obama’s California Electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until such documentary proof is produced and verified.

    In response to questions about why the suit was being filed, Ambassador Alan Keyes commented, “I and others are concerned that this issue be properly investigated and decided before Senator Obama takes office. Otherwise there will be a serious doubt as to the legitimacy of his tenure. This doubt would also affect the respect people have for the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. I hope the issue can be quickly clarified so that the new President can take office under no shadow of doubt. This will be good for him and for the nation.”

    Former Reagan administration official Ambassador Alan Keyes and Wiley S. Drake were the 2008 presidential and vice-presidential nominees of the American Independent Party, which is the California affiliate of the new national America’s Independent Party.

    Mission Viejo, California attorney Dr. Orly Taitz and United States Justice Foundation Executive Director Gary Kreep are representing the plaintiffs in this case.

    Copies of the court filing, along with further information concerning developments in this case, will be made available at www.AIPNEWS.com, or can be obtained by contacting AIP national chairman Tom Hoefling. (tomhoefling@gmail.com)
    The Supreme Court of the United States
     
    What is accurate is that the Supreme Court via Justice David Souter has given President-elect Obama, the DNC and other defendants until December 1 to respond to the court case dismissed by the Third Circuit in late-October.

    Here is the Docket entry from the Supreme Court website:

    No. 08-570
    Title: Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
    v.
    Barack Obama, et al.

    Docketed: October 31, 2008
    Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case Nos.: (08-4340)
    Rule 11

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
    Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of
    certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
    Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
    Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.

    ——————————————————————————–

    ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
    Lafayette Hill, PA 09867
    Party name: Philip J. Berg

    Attorneys for Respondents:
    Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
    United States Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

    I called the number listed on the Supreme Court website: Public Information Office: 202-479-3211, and asked the person who answered if the Obama camp had until December 1 to produce a birth certificate. She said she could not verify the specifics of the case but said Obama has until December 1 to produce a Brief in response to the Third Circuit case No. 08-4340.

    UPDATE: Scott at the SCOTUS PIO recommended this document which provides the press with an understanding of stays and writs of certiorari. Most such applications are denied but this one is pending. From the document:

    There are several possible scenarios for the disposition of an application:
    • A Justice may simply deny without comment or explanation.
    • If a Justice acts alone to deny an application, a petitioner may reapply to any other Justice of his or her choice, and theoretically can continue until a majority of the Court has denied the application.
    In practice, applications usually are referred to the full Court by the second Justice to avoid such a prolonged procedure.
    • A Justice may call for a response from the opposition before reaching a final decision. Such responses are usually due by a date and time certain. The Justice may grant an interim stay pending receipt of a response.
    • A Justice may grant. If an application is granted by an individual Justice, or if the full Court acts upon one, its disposition is indicated by a written order or sometimes, an opinion. An order granting an application will indicate how long the order will remain in effect—usually until the Court acts on the petition for writ of certiorari. In fairly standard language, the order will often go on to state that if the petition is denied, the stay will automatically terminate, but if the Court grants full review, the stay will remain in effect until the Court hands down a decision on the merits and the mandate or judgment is issued.
    Excerpted from: http://wthrockmorton.com/2008/11/10/berg-vs-obama-response-to-supreme-court-due-december-1/
     
    Further information about other lawsuits in other states

    Two cases already at the SCOTUS 08A407 and 08A391

    17 cases from 12 states in the works.

    Keyes seems to have the best “standing” so far.

    Friday, November 14, 2008 10:19:20 PM by hoosiermama
     
    Note: "Governor Lingle (R) has denied she "sealed" the file. However, the law states that only the selfsame person (Obama) can ask to have it released. "

    Ad in Washington Times National Weekly

    This full-page ad appeared today in the Washington Times National Weekly (Monday November 17th edition) It will hit subscribers' mailboxes on Tuesday. (PDF attached at bottom)

    alt

     

    Attachments:
    File Description File size
    Obama Crimes Ad - Wash Times 20081117.pdf This ad ran on page 5 of the November 17th, 2008 edition of the Washington Times National Weekly
     
     
     

    Barack Obama birth certificate battle unfolds in Honolulu court on Tuesday, November 18th

    Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin has landed in Honolulu
    to lead the fight for access to Obama’s family records.
    Martin will ask a Hawai’i circuit judge to direct state officials to release Barack Obama’s original, typewritten 1962 birth certificate. The Honolulu hearing is the first judicial proceeding to consider the birth certificate question in open court. Andy is a graduate of the University of Illinois College of Law (J.D.) and a former adjunct professor at the City University of New York.

    Andy Martin lands in Honolulu to prepare for court hearing in Obama birth certificate battle

    ANDY MARTIN
    Executive Editor
    ContrarianCommentary.com

    “Factually Correct, Not
    Politically Correct”

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN IS BACK IN HONOLULU TO FIGHT FOR ACCESS TO BARACK OBAMA’S ORIGINAL, TYPEWRITTEN 1961 BIRTH CERTIFICATE

    AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE PREPARATION NECESSARY TO PRESENT A COMPLEX CONSTITUTIONAL CASE 8,000 MILES AWAY FROM HOME

    (HONOLULU)(November 16, 2008) Aloha from Hawaii.

    I landed in Honolulu Friday and we have set up a fully functional “fighting camp” to prepare for the court hearing Tuesday, November 18th at 10:30 A.M. on access to Barack Obama’s birth certificate

    This will be the first court hearing anywhere on access to the original, 1961 certificate. The only state that has jurisdiction over such a lawsuit is Hawai’i, because Hawai’i officials are the custodians of the 1961 typewritten paperwork.

    Before we get to the back story, let me start with a disclaimer. I have no idea what the judge will do on Tuesday. I make no predictions, except one: I will prepare to the best of my ability and present as professional a case as the judge permits. Monday morning I will be on the street serving papers and filing with the Clerk in preparation for Tuesday.

    And, looking ahead, whatever happens on Tuesday, on Wednesday we hope to launch my “Conversation With America” about our future course of action in an Obama administration. I invite all of you to join in and support this mission.

    Just as the FBI always attends every Gambino Family funeral to see who is there, ContrarianCommentary.com was in Honolulu Friday to observe the “independent” (not family-sponsored) “memorial service” held in memory of Barack Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. We will have a full column later Sunday, or possibly Monday.

    It occurred to me that you might appreciate some insight into the effort that goes into preparing and presenting a major piece of litigation 8,000 miles away from home.

    Anyone who has read our Memorandum of Law (see the ContrarianCommentary.com blogs below for a full copy) will not be surprised that it took us the better part of a week to analyze, research, write and finalize a 25-page document (which we will be filing with the Clerk on Monday morning) setting forth why Obama’s birth certificate must be made public.

    If a large law firm was handling the case of Martin vs. Obama, they would probably send a minimum team of four lawyers as well as support personnel. They would have a trial counsel, a couple of associates, and a senior partner to guide the overall process. There would be at least one paralegal, possibly more. That’s why high stakes litigation is so costly.

    Martin vs. Obama is a high stakes lawsuit: it seeks to open a vital record of American history to public review and analysis.

    And I will be working alone.

    Ask any lawyer: it’s not easy landing in a strange town, setting up an office and firing off legal documents in a controversial constitutional case. But we managed to file the lawsuit two days after arriving in Honolulu in October, and now we are back for the first court hearing anywhere to address the issue of Barack Obama’s origins.

    Landing in an unfamiliar city, any lawyer would need a support network. We managed to recreate our October “fighting camp” in 24 hours and are up and running. I dragged a printer on the 12 hour flight because we have to be able to react immediately to any development. Saturday morning we were out assembling office supplies to be ready to move quickly on Monday morning.

    I even purchased a box of envelopes so that if we have a breather, we can start mailing out thank you notes to everyone who contributed to the financial support of this very costly and complex venture. There is no wasted time on a trip of this nature, and no wasted money.

    I will take time off Sunday morning to attend services at Saint Andrews (Episcopal) cathedral in downtown Honolulu. And I forgot to pack my sunglasses, so I need to go shopping for a pair.

    Unlike other lawsuits involving Obama, mine is narrowly and specifically focused on access to the original, typewritten 1961 certificate which Hawai’i officials have confirmed they possess. There is no way anyone can express an opinion on the circumstances of Obama’s birth without seeing the vital gateway document. I have refrained from speculating on the contents of the original because my focus is on expressing an informed opinion (a term CNN once made fund of).

    Mr. Obama and his Chicago crew have been very crafty in creating a cloud of confusion over the “abstract” that he furnished to FactCheck.org as a purported original birth certificate, when obviously it was nothing of the sort. Many millions of people were confused even though the term “abstract” was clearly visible on the FactCheck.org site (and even though FactCheck.org seems to have missed that significance, as well).

    We will also be continuing and conducting the research and investigation we began in October to document Obama’s origins in Hawai’i with interviews and contacts with people who knew his family and the other “players” in the Honolulu dramas of the 1970’s and 80’s.

    As these comments are being prepared Sunday morning I can only conclude with a sense of deep humility at the enormity of the task and the nature of the burden. I continue to bear Barack Obama no ill will. Nevertheless, I passionately and sincerely believe that he owes the American people a detailed exposition of both his personal and his family history, and that he has not been candid with the American people. Without candor, he will not be able to establish the legitimacy that is essential for national leadership. He remains a stranger to the American people.

    Barack Obama and his character assassins such as Robert Gibbs have done everything they can to demonize and defeat and intimidate me. They have failed utterly and abjectly. Tuesday morning I will stand up in court, stand tall, and stand proud for every American who believes Barack Obama needs to start telling the truth about himself. The election may be over. But the search for the truth about Mr. Obama is continuing.
     
    State Of Hawaii Backs Andy Martin In Obama Birth Certificate Battle      
    November 1, 2008

    (HONOLULU)(November 1, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin has ignited a firestorm in Hawaii over Barack Obama's bogus "original" birth certificate. Martin won a stunning victory Friday afternoon (October 31st) when the State of Hawai'i backed his assertion that there was an original, "typewritten, 1961" birth certificate, called a "Certificate of Live Birth" or "COLB" in Hawai'i, that no one has previously seen. Hawai'i officials retrieved and examined the document after Martin filed a lawsuit seeking access to the historic 1961 original. 
     
    Obama has falsely claimed to have placed the "original" on the Internet. Factcheck.org has falsely claimed to have seen this document and posted it on the Internet; that is not true. CNN has falsely ridiculed Martin.
     
    Hawaii officials have now refuted Obama's false assertion.
     
    Martin's victory in Honolulu will roil the final weekend of the presidential campaign. Internet chatter is expected to explode as the issue moves to the front page over Saturday and Sunday. Swing voters may be swayed by the exposure that Obama has brazenly been lying to the American people. "We just lobbed a grenade into the final weekend of the presidential campaign," says Andy.
     
    "I am ecstatic. I called Obama a liar. I called Factcheck.org 'ObamaLies.org.' I said CNN was sloppy and lazy and wrong. And I was right. The State of Hawai'i has now backed me up. Whew. I knew I was right, but I feel a lot more comfortable knowing that I have started to get the machinery moving in state government. The original document is now obviously protected and safe from any tampering by Obama.
     
    "My lawsuit started a firestorm in Hawai'i. The circuit judge has set a hearing for November 18th (a report in the Honolulu Advertiser for November 1st for an earlier hearing date of November 7th is inaccurate; that date was cancelled).
     
    "CNN also has egg on its face, because, once again, Hawai'i backs my contention that the original document has never surfaced in public. CNN tried to demean me by contradicting my accurate claim.
     
    "Now Obama, Factcheck.org and CNN have been exposed as liars. I said there was a 'secret,' original, typewritten birth certificate that had never been disclosed, and that document was the original COLB, not the phony 'original' that CNN placed before its viewers.
     
    "Why would Hawai'i officials review the vault document at the Eleventh Hour if my lawsuit wasn't causing a furor in Hawai'i state government? Why? The Friday before the election?
     
    "Mine is the only logical, rational, properly prepared lawsuit that has been filed to open Obama's secret records. I sued in the proper state in the proper court against the proper officials for the proper remedy. And they are responding properly. The judge has properly, although not as quickly as I would have preferred, set a hearing to consider my claims. I have not filed outrageous or exaggerated pleadings.
     
    "I merely sought access to a document based on its scholarly and news value and because I had been tipped by my sources inside state government that Obama was lying. My network of informants within state government helps me and guides me. Others filed lawsuits outside Hawai'i that have either been dismissed or discredited. My 'little engine that could' is chugging along.
     
    "I have an outstanding record of high-profile public interest litigation, as recognized by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court five years ago when they allowed me to represent a U. S. Marine in a landmark lawsuit." See www.AndyMartin.com and www.FirstRespondersOnline.us
     
    In a Honolulu news conference on October 22nd Martin disclosed that Frank Marshall Davis was the biological father of Barack Obama, not Barack Obama senior. The Obama campaign has not denied Martin's claim.
     
    "Over the past month I have been on combat patrol from coast to coast for the truth and for the United States Constitution," says Andy. "I have not the slightest link to John McCain. I am connected to the Constitution and nothing else. I have waged relentless war against Barack Obama's lies. And on the eve of the final weekend in the presidential campaign Hawai'i government has backed me by confirming that officials have examined the original, typewritten 1961 document, and confirmed that the document released by the Obama campaign was a facsimile, not the original.
     
    "I have won a major victory: I proved Obama was lying about what he had posed on the Internet and falsely portrayed as 'the original.' 'Barry, we caught you with your pants down. We caught you lying, again.
     
    "Saturday it will be my pleasure to return home to Chicago after one of the most successful independent political battle operations in media history, to wage the final weekend of war for the truth and Constitution and against the Daley Machine and Obama Gang. I have successfully been exposing and fighting Daley Family corruption for over forty years. Barry Obama is part of the second generation Daley Machine. He is a member in good standing of this criminal operation.
     
    "The Machine doesn't like me. But I have a history of coming up with the truth, and a history of embarrassing powerful people. In retaliation, they try to smear me. The disclosure that Hawai'i officials have examined the true original COLB, and that Obama lied to the American people by falsely claiming he had posted the original 1961 document, is going to spread like wildfire between Saturday and Tuesday night.
     
    "This election is bizarre because the presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, the Party's leader, is from the Daley Machine in Chicago. And the leader of the Internet Army opposing Obama and working to defeat him and the Daley Machine is also from Chicago. My Senator would be proud.
     
    Martin is expected to announce Saturday that he is suing Fox News as well as the New York Times, for defamation of character. The lawsuit will be released Monday morning.
     
    "For Fox News to treat me as they did is beneath contempt," says Martin. "I am respected around the world for accuracy, honesty and integrity. We know the New York Times is a corrupt media operation. But Fox News? Well, Ruppert Murdock may want to kow'tow to Barack Obama, but I will not kow'tow to Ruppert Murdock. The crass executives deserve to be sued for their malicious attacks on me. Someone ought to stand up for me: I helped expose Bill Ayers and Khalid Al-Mansour. A slimy 'vice president' that probably never worked a case or a story had the nerve to demean me. What a compete corporate moron.
     
    "How dare these media imposters and blowhards smear me with lies, when I have worked tirelessly to expose the truth about Barack Obama-and succeeded," Martin will charge. "I'll be happy to face the Fox jerk, Vice President Bill Shine, in court and defend my good name against Obama's mud merchants, the New York Times and Ruppert Murdock. Ruppert Murdock's daughter is backing Obama, for Chrissake.
     
    "I also plan Saturday to thank Dr. Chiyome Fukino for confirming my factual allegation that there was/is an original, typewritten 1961 'vault' COLB that has not been made public and that the true 'original' COLB is in official files. That confirmation makes Barack Obama a liar, on the last weekend of the campaign. Thank you, doctor.
     
    "Now you know why Obama and Axelrod and Gibbs call me the 'Internet Powerhouse' that can't be stopped. Barack Obama will be bleeding through election night because of this massive lie exposed on the eve of their election. I work for the American people, not John McCain or the Republican Party. Friday, truth arrived in Honolulu, and in the remaining 100 hours that truth is going to be spread from coast-to-coast.
     
    "Obama lied."
     
    Martin lands in Chicago at noon, and will proceed to his office, for an afternoon news conference.
     
    Martin is also soliciting financial support to fund his litigation in Hawai'i.
     
    NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:
     
    WHO:     
     
    Internet Powerhouse and national anti-Obama leader, Author/Editor/Internet Columnist Andy Martin   
     
    WHAT:    
     
    National anti-Obama leader Andy Martin thanks Hawai'i officials for confirming his claims and exposing Barack Obama as a liar and lays out his battle plan for the final 72 hours of the presidential campaign.
     
    WHERE:
     
    Southeast corner of Huron and Wabash Streets, Chicago
     
    WHEN: Saturday, November 1, 3:00 P. M.
     
    Latest information on Jerome Corsi

    Corsi was on with Gordon Liddy a few days ago. He was very sick, sounded weak. He explained when he was jailed in Kenya with his health issues and then the food etc. while held there had taken a toll on him. He might have been on ten minutes or so.

    72 posted on Friday, November 14, 2008 10:37:56 PM by GrannyK
     
    For what it’s worth, Ed Hale says he has a copy of the African BC. naming Coast Provincial General Hospital, Mombasa Kenya as the place of BO’s birth....And that he told the person who gave it to him, he would not go public until a legal channels had been exhausted.
     
    138 posted on Friday, November 14, 2008 11:21:35 PM by hoosiermama
     
    Release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft.

    Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?

    It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.

    But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.

    obamaselectiveserviceregist.jpg
    Obamaselectiveserviceprinto.jpg

    The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama's Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it's proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.

    But the Selective Service System registration ("SSS Form 1") and accompanying computer print-out ("SSS Print-out), below, released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated: 
     
    All info here in this part of the posting (excerpted from lengthy articlecame from Debbie Schlussel's' Website at: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
     
    Who said "the Constitution is fundamentally flawed."?

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »