About Me

Name: Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

"List of every Hawaii hospital confirming: Obama not born here."

FOR THE RECORD: Hospital after Hospital - all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There.    All of these were called or visited from November 20 - December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE AS A FACT!
Hospital employees were bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly.
 Excerpted from: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135
 

Hospitals in Hawaii to Obama: You Were Not Born Here!

Supposed Conspiracy Claim Turns REAL on Obama   Excerpted from: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135

It is becoming painfully obvious that we may very well have a criminal President in 2009.  No this isn’t a joke. What I speak of is the curious developments in the supposedly racist, biased, dumb,  as well as insane case of where Obama was born.  Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate

A strange development indeed is how it is that every time Barack Obama or a family member tells of where Obama was born, they seem to have no idea as of December 2008.

They seemed to know what hospital quite a few times months ago when it was claimed that Obama’s mother gave birth to him at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu - Obama and Mom Never Here

The Queen’s Medical Center
1301 Punchbowl StreetHonolulu, HI 96813  Link to Site
Phone number 808-538-9011 General Medical Records 808-547-4361.

After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there, his sister was in an interview (Mary) and claimed that Obama was born at  Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children - Obama and Mom Never Here 1319 Punahou StreetHonolulu, Hawaii 96826(808) 535-7000  Link to site

Hospital after Hospital - all Have No Record of Obama being born or Mom Ever being There. 

Hospital after hospital in Honolulu all have NO RECORD of Obama or mother ever being there.   Is this some state secret? Are we to believe that even the hospital that he was born in should remain secret? Why lie to us as if it matters I mean the man did win the Presidential vote? Why the lies and secrecy?

We already know that Obama’s family and the entire nation of Kenya (which is about to have a national holiday for Obama) know that Barack Obama was born in Mombasa Coastal Hospital in Kenya. The government of Kenya has sealed these records.  More and more secrecy due to the fact that once proven, Obama will not be constitutionally allowed to become President of the United States!

All of these were called or visited from November 20 - December 2nd 2008. It is confirmed, OBAMA was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County! NONE AS A FACT!

Hospital employees were bribed, some gave info for free. All to be released on video shortly.

Hospitals you can check yourself (Hint on the process: Most of the following Hospitals didn’t exist in Honolulu County at time of Obama’s birth so this was an academic exercise) The main two hospitals claimed that definitely existed are above and both have no record of Obama or Mother Ann in either of them.

We were pretty detailed in our calls and visits thanks to dozens of native Hawaiian patriots! To the College Republicans all over the Island kudos!.   You can look at every hospital here and call or visit any of them.  Everyone has a family member working in a hospital. Talk, pay and bribe. You can file freedom of information acts, you can do everything and anything you wish.  Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.

Only his original that he has sealed will have this info.  Will the Supreme Court force it open and thus preserve the Constitution of the United States?

Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate

Hawaii Issues Birth Certificates to Foreign Born Residents!

Here’s Hawaii saying it like it it. All Doubts Cleared my Friends.

A. From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country (applies to adopted children). 
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8.  A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error.  See, for example, HRS 338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program.  From its web site:  “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”   Excerpted from lengthy article at: http://www.earthfrisk.com/blog/?p=135

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Preface:
"... a "Certification of Live Birth" is what has been released, not a "Certificate of Live Birth". These two are frequently mixed up with each other in the MSM and Blogs, but hopefully not in the Court cases."

A "Certificate of Live Birth" is what would give all of the extra information that is being requested.

They both are abbreviated as COLB and this has lead to a lot of confusion.

The "Certification" can be issued to Foreign born whereas a "Certificate" is not, but a foreign "Certificate" could be on file for Mr. Obama, leading to the statements from Hawaii about one being on file.

This is the famous statement that contained truth, but not the whole truth, from Hawaii officials.
(Go to rightside of my blog here and you may follow the course of (the latest news of Barack Obama's "birth certificate" issue and lawsuits) in the almost daily postings. Lower on the rightside are the Months of the year(s) and you may find additional postings there that apply.)
 
OBAMA'S FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NOT GOING AWAY: STATUS REPORT UPDATE: Every Hawaii hospital confirms: not born here
Excerpted from: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/obamas-forged-b.html#more
Currently, there are 16 cases in 12 states (with 2 before the Supreme Court) contending that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be sworn in as President of the United States.
Click below - lengthy post
Coming out of Chicago, 2 years 9 months ago, a 26 page report on the importance of getting rid of the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution
Quote:
Sarah P. Herlihy is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP http://www.kirkland.com . Note: this law firm is based in Chicago.

Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C. (aka PARTNER), is a Member of the finance committees for both U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.
Not the only partner with ties to their Harvard Senator. Chicago law firm... US Senators for Illinois... yeah, easy link.
Now, we can get into the new affidavits, or testimonies of ambassadors, or forensic experts that go under the psuedonym Dr Ron Polarik, but really, why bother? No one wants to send a guy guilty of forging a US birth certificate to jail for 15 years. Instead, lets focus on how in 2006, Obama's buddies felt it necessary to put together a 26 page dissertation why the "natural born" clause is the "stupidest provision."
Kirkland's specialty?
Quote:
Kirkland & Ellis has a 100-year history of providing exceptional service to clients around the world in complex litigation, corporate and tax, intellectual property, restructuring and counseling matters. The groundwork has been established for another century of superior legal work and client service.
Where do they mention Constitutional law? Perhaps under "Other"...
The story that Atlas broke:
July 4, 2008   EXCLUSIVE: Atlas Tech Expert Declares Obama Birth Certificate Forgery
July 11, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FORENSIC EXPERT: "the [birth] certificate is still a horrible forgery"
July 20, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN
Duo take Obama birth challenge to Court
[§338-17.8]  Certificates for children born out of State. (a)  Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
What Exactly is the Hub Bub Page.(hat tip Larwyn)
 
Andy Martin's case:

Sunday, February 08, 2009

Andy Martin will appeal Obama birth certificate decision to Hawai'i appeals court

The battle to find out "who Barack Obama really is" continues. Martin's lawsuit remains the only litigation in the proper court against the proper officials to secure access to Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.  Read more at: contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2009/02/andy-martin-will-appeal-obama-birth.html
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Latest on Obama Birth Certificate, (Leo Donofrio & SCOTUS)

Latest"Leo Donofrio notes that the Court (SCOTUS) today issued a Miscellaneous Order granting certiorari on at least two cases: Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli and Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. He thinks this is a bad sign, but notes that the full list will be out on Monday." 12/5/08 7PM.
(Also see SCOTUS Blog entry below)

DOCKET CONFUSION - WND LETTER CAMPAIGN - DEC. 5th RADIO INTERVIEWSs

Posted in Uncategorized on December 5, 2008 by naturalborncitizen

DOCKET CONFUSION

I must admit that past comments of mine regarding the docket entries of Nov. 19, one for the Justice Thomas referral and one for the distribution for conference, might not signify any affirmative action.   I cannot get a straight answer from the Supreme Court despite many attempts.  Different press sources have also received various explanations as well.

I’ve examined other dockets for applications and I cannot say with any degree of certainty what the docket entries mean.   I have requested an explanation from the Clerk numerous times and guidance from the Public Information Office.  The PIO did try to help, moreso than the Clerk’s office, but I am more confused than ever.

Muddying the waters is the  Reporter’s Guide to Applications Pending Before the United States Supreme Court, specifically page 3.

I am removing from my blog, all references which indicate any knowledge of what the docket entries mean.  And let me go on the record to apologize if it turns out that my analysis of the docket was erroneous.   I did the best I could with the information I had.

I have not been given any information on the disposition of the application at the conference today.   SCOTUS did issue a miscellaneous order granting certiorari in two other cases today.

The rest of their orders for today should come out on Monday.  If I had to read into this, I would say it doesn’t look good, but it’s just a guess.  The Public Information Office said they have no information other than what the Court published today.   The full order list will be out on Monday.

I wish I could give better guidance, but I can’t.

WORLD NET DAILY LETTER CAMPAIGN

I also want people to know that I appreciate all the letters sent, but I never supported a form letter.   I was adamant about that and I was hoping people would formulate their own thoughts and not sign a kind of petition.   People need to think and express themselves from their own personal heart and mind.

As I reported below, the letter didn’t address the issues of my case, and the solicitation for participation in the campaign did unfortunately mix up the birth certificate issue, something I’ve really tried to avoid. I believe Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and that the only people with standing to certify that info are the various Secretaries of State.

But I do appreciate so much that people laid out money to support the Constitutional issues raised.   And I know it was important for folks to be heard before the conference today.  I just don’t like the concept of bulk e mails.  It’s not like the Justices will read them over and over.  Think about it.

I’m not into herding.  I’m into individual expression.  And I refuse to tell people what to say.  I’ve been consistent about that.

The World Net Daily letter campaign had nothing to do with me and I did not endorse it.  But I do appreciate the effort everybody made, including WND.   It’s just not my style and never will be.

Also, I will not be involved with any press conferences on Monday, Dec 8.  If you see my name associated with that anything like that, please know it is not with my permission.  If you don’t read about something involving me on this blog, assume my name is being used without my permission.

UPCOMING RADIO INTERVIEWS FOR DEC. 5, 2008.

At 9:00 PM EST, I will be on The Lion’s Den, Plains Radio Network.

At 1:00 AM EST, I will be on Coast To Coast with George Noory.  Their web site hasn’t been updated yet, but I haven’t emailed the release form back yet, so give it an hour or so.

That’s the last radio I’m doing unless certiorari is granted.  I have refused all requests for TV interviews and will continue to do so regardless of the outcome.  Radio is a much more powerful form of communication.

Posted in Uncategorized on December 5, 2008 by naturalborncitizen

At Barack Obama’s web site, the following admission:

“FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.

That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”

That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr.  Brack Obama has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.

And this leads to the relevant question:

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States.  This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.

Excerpted from: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To Everyone 

The Issue: 
It is not about whether he is a citizen or not. It is about whether he is a "natural born citizen". In order to be President you must be the latter.

In order to be a "natural born citizen" both parents must have been a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth. If you are born in the U.S. and one parent is a U.S. citizen and the other isn't you are then just a citizen, not a "natural born citizen."

In Obama's case his mother was a citizen but his father was not, he was from Kenya. Therefore, technically, Obama is just a citizen and not a "natural born citizen."

This is what the case is about.

"Obama was born a dual citizen," Bredow said, "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth." This, said Bredow, meant that the president-elect could never take the oath of office. "

"And on Friday, the Supreme Court would read Donofrio v. Wells, a suit brought by a New Jersey poker player against his state elections officer, which laid out the charges in the hopes of nullifying the election. "

  
Obama Birth Certificate Protest At SCOTUS

Four days ago, Roger Bredow uploaded a video to YouTube beseeching like-minded people to come to Washington, D.C. and stand with him outside the Supreme Court.

"[Barack] Obama was born a dual citizen," Bredow said, "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth." This, said Bredow, meant that the president-elect could never take the oath of office.

And on Friday, the Supreme Court would read Donofrio v. Wells, a suit brought by a New Jersey poker player against his state elections officer, which laid out the charges in the hopes of nullifying the election.

Today at 8 a.m., they came.

"If I'm going to be honest with you," said Bredow, sporting a floppy American flag hat that he'd promised on YouTube he'd be wearing, "I thought I might be the only person here."

He had flown in from Georgia. The other fifteen to twenty people who cycled in and out of the small protest had traveled shorter distances—southern Pennsylvania, northern Virginia—but they felt they had to do something.

The "dual born citizen" claim is the latest (and maybe strongest) attempt by Obama conspiracy theorists to argue that he can't be president, but most of the people I talked to had questioned Obama's citizenship long before this.

"I first heard about it from Phil Berg's case," said Julie Menge of Williamsburg, Virginia, referring to a case that alleges, among other things, that a 2007 state of Hawaii reproduction of Obama's birth certification is forged, and that Obama's paternal Kenyan step-grandmother Sarah was in the room when he was born.

One protestor claimed that a mysterious Muslim imam blessed Obama's birth in Kenya, and that this fact would eventually be revealed, somehow. (He cited African Press International, a bizarre web site that claims it has, but will not make public, a tape of Michelle Obama ranting about racist media coverage of her husband.)

At 9 a.m., a black minister who would only give his name as Brother Pittman led a prayer circle and a recitation of the pledge of allegiance. Pittman, who lives in Silver Spring, came as a "representative of the Rev. James David Manning," a Harlem preacher who became an Internet legend for a February sermon in which he called Obama a "long-legged mack daddy" who was "born trash."

"I've been shunned by members of my own family," Pittman said. "I tell them, do the research! Go online and look up the facts! This is all about openness and why Barack Obama won't answer questions about who he is."

There's nothing new at all about small, strange protests outside the court, whether or not the justices are at work.

While the Obama protestors were praying, a group of 16 young Christians walked up to the other side of the Court steps, strumming a guitar and lighting candles before holding a pro-life prayer vigil.

Police and tourists looked on and a very small group of journalists grabbed the Obama protestors for interviews. "This story is writing itself," said a Mother Jones reporter as he filmed the prayer circle.

The Supreme Court will announce whether it will actually consider the Obama lawsuit as early as today and as late as Monday.

If (as expected) the Court tosses the suit, Bredow will start challenging Obama's legitimacy based on "foreign money that went into his campaign."

Other protestors said they'd start contacting members of the Electoral College. Steve Brindle, who drove down from Pennsylvania, said he'd called his senators yesterday.

 


Group seeks to have state's votes for Obama set aside

By Michelle Dupler, Herald staff writer

A group of Washington residents have filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court asking the state's votes for President-elect Barack Obama be set aside.

James E. Broe of King County and 12 others claim Obama never established that he is a natural-born American citizen as required by the Constitution, and that Obama ran under a false name.

A similar suit before the election was dismissed in King County.

Obama is set to receive the state's 11 electoral votes when the Electoral College delegates meet in Olympia on Dec. 15.

Dave Ammons, spokesman for Secretary of State Sam Reed's office, said in an e-mail to the Herald that the state's position is that Reed is not required and does not have the authority to investigate the qualifications of candidates for president and vice president.

"Under state law, the Republican and Democratic tickets are automatically placed on the fall ballot after the national party conventions," Ammons said. "Other tickets can qualify by having 1,000 registered Washington voters sign petitions at conventions. The state Elections Division examines the signatures, but does not investigate the qualifications of the candidates."

The lawsuit claims that Reed has known about questions concerning Obama's eligibility since September, but did nothing to determine whether Obama was a lawful candidate.

The claims rest on Obama's alleged failure to provide a certificate of live birth from his home state of Hawaii. Court documents say Obama instead has published a document called a Certification of Live Birth, which the suit claims does not prove Obama was born on American soil.

The suit also claims Obama was adopted by a stepfather in Indonesia and took the legal name Barry Soetoro, and that Barack Hussein Obama was not his legal name when he filed as a candidate in Washington. The claims are based on school records published on the TV show Inside Edition, according to court documents... (more)   Excerpted from:

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illegal immigrants, register to vote , have driver's licenses, and are kidnapping our children.

"... search for the child and his abductors, who are believed to be Mexican drug dealers. "
 
Police seeking grandfather as link to missing boy
By KEN RITTER  Excerpted Article 
 
LAS VEGAS—The grandfather of a kidnapped 6-year-old boy was named Friday as a "person of interest" in a nationwide search for the child and his abductors, who are believed to be Mexican drug dealers.
 
A nationwide Amber Alert remained in effect for Puffinburger, a blond-haired, blue-eyed first-grader with silver-framed glasses. He was described as 3 feet 11 inches tall and 48 pounds, and was last seen wearing a black shirt, a black zip-up sweat shirt with white, black and blue stars, blue jeans and tennis shoes.

Cannito said authorities were looking for Tinnemeyer and his white 2004 Dodge extended-cab pickup truck, which he

said bore Mississippi license plates KA6251. He was described as 5-foot-10 and 210 to 250 pounds, with hazel eyes and brown hair.....

"Money is a huge factor, obviously. Drugs are a huge factor," Johnson said. "The only innocent person involved in this entire operation is the boy."

Authorities were investigating whether other family members also had ties to the drug operation, Johnson said.

Cannito said police had "several" other persons of interest in the case, but no suspects in the abduction.

Investigators have said two Hispanic men identified themselves as police officers to gain entry to the house in a residential neighborhood several miles northeast of downtown Las Vegas. They demanded money and tied up the boy's mother and her boyfriend, and ransacked the house before making off with the boy. Cannito said a third man was believed to be involved.

Authorities offered a vague description of one suspect—a man in his early 30s with slicked-back, black shoulder-length hair. He was said to be about 5 feet 7 inches tall and 150 pounds, wearing a white T-shirt and blue jeans.

Police had no description of the other men or a getaway car, which delayed the initial posting of the statewide alert.
Excerpted from: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10746868?source=most_viewed

Man found chained to wall in home
Victim allegedly kidnapped to pay drug debt


By Alex P. Joyner
Staff Writer

ATLANTA - Clogged roads and seemingly endless blocks of sprawl - for years synonymous with Gwinnett for all the wrong reasons - are being replaced as the county's siren song.

Federal officials said Monday that Gwinnett is now the focal point of competing metro area Mexican drug cartels trafficking cocaine and methamphetamines due to its burgeoning Hispanic population and transportation infrastructure.

And in the last 90 days, there has been an uptick in brutal violence borne out of the trade that once was sequestered inside the Mexican border.

"These traffickers unleash ruthless forms of violence in order to protect and defend their drugs and cash," said Rod Benson, special agent in charge of the Atlanta's Drug Enforcement Office office.

That analysis came three days after federal agents rescued an alleged drug dealer who was kidnapped by several men July 5 and chained to a wall in the basement of a middle-class Lilburn home in retaliation for a drug debt he owed. His three captors were arrested shortly after fleeing the scene.

Oscar Reynoso, 31, currently in federal custody for his safety, was found severely dehydrated and badly beaten July 11 by authorities after being chained and gagged for a week. He allegedly was being held as ransom for owing a man named Tio about $300,000 in drug-related debts, the Justice Department said.

His three captors - Victor Abiles-Gomez, 20, Omar Mendoza-Villegas, 19, and Gerardo Solorio-Reyes, 23, - made an initial appearance Monday in federal magistrate court, charged with kidnapping for ransom and conspiracy to distribute cocaine. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Monday. All three are in the country illegally.

Tio, however, remains at large.

"That investigation is ongoing," United States Attorney David Nahmias said.

The kidnapping - Gwinnett's second drug-related nabbing in a week - was broken up after federal and local authorities received a confidential tip that Reynoso was being held at 755 E. Fork Shady Drive in Lilburn. After spotting law enforcement officers, the trio attempted to flee but were later caught by DEA agents.

Upon searching the home, Reynoso was found chained and hyperventilating near a mattress. Agents removed his gag and gave him fluids and medical attention. He was arrested and detained as a material witness.

Reynoso, a native of the Dominican Republic, told authorities he was lured to Atlanta from Rhode Island to buy a car with Tio. He said he met Tio at a Gwinnett restaurant and the two rode to the East Fork Shady Drive residence. When Reynoso entered the garage, he allegedly was ambushed and beaten by seven men, some of whom carried firearms.

While he was held hostage, Reynoso's alleged captors, including Tio, contacted Reynoso's wife in Rhode Island to collect the debt, Justice Department officials said. He also was constantly threatened during the ordeal.

Reynoso's captors appeared diminutive and nervous as DEA officials ushered them into United States Magistrate Judge Janet F. King's courtroom Monday afternoon. Each looked at the ground as they listened to a translator, their clothes soiled from Friday's raid.

Reynoso - wearing a dirty white T-shirt and jeans, and noticeably groggy - had an initial hearing in King's courtroom about an hour before his captors appeared. Though he is not being charged with a criminal act, he remains in federal custody due to concerns for his safety.

Speaking with reporters after the hearings, Nahmias and Benson said they have seen an upswing in drug-related violence in the past 90 days, the majority of which is occurring in Gwinnett.

"It's a significant concern for the community," Nahmias said.

Excerpted from: http://gwinnettdailypost.com/main.asp?SectionID=6&SubSectionID=84&ArticleID=17277
 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
The Bulletin ^ | 10/17/2008 | Michael P. Tremoglie
Two men arrested Oct. 14 in Reading on drug charges turned out to be paroled killers as well as illegal Cuban immigrants who were ordered to be deported but were not.The two were identified as Pedro Gonzalez-Aguiar, 46 and Pablo Morales-Torres, 56 both of Reading. Mr. Gonzalez-Aguilar was serving a 1984 robbery sentence when he killed a man in Graterford Prison in 1987. He served 16 years of the 11 to 25 year sentence he received for the crime. He was released in 2003. Mr. Morales-Torres was sentenced to 20 years for a 1987 murder committed in Lancaster. He served...
 
 
video
 
Hillary & Obama want Illegals to have drivers licenses - this is the key for voter fraud! How many of you knew that 8 of the 19 ... (more
 
 
http://www.witntv.com/home/headlines/15285611.html It is a staggering figure. 16000 illegal immigrants cross the border ... (more)
 
 
 
This document is a record and analysis of all of Sen. Obama's immigration related congressional votes, cosponsorships, and other immigration actions during his career in Congress. Immigration Profiles is the only exhaustive source for this information available in one place.
(If you are reading this on paper, note the "Last Updated" date above. Consult the website www.NumbersUSA.com for any new or changed information, which occurs often.)


Fax Congressabout its immigration voting record
View Report Card of Sen. Obama's Immigration Actions

  Links to document sections:

Career Record Source: Congressional Record
Usually supports higher immigration, population growth, foreign labor.
Each symbol in the left-hand column below signifies an action for HIGHER immigration.
Voting Key
Each symbol in the right-hand column below signifies an action for LOWER immigration.
Chain Migration & Visa Lottery
top
Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to expand chain migration in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Clinton Amendment (SA 1183) to S. 1348. The Clinton Amendment would significantly increase legal immigration by adding an unlimited number of spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents to the uncapped immediate relative category that currently is for the spouses, minor children and parents of U.S. citizens only. The spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents currently are allocated some 87,000 visas each year. The Clinton Amendment failed by a vote of 44 to 53.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to increase chain migration in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Menendez Amedment (SA 1194) to S. 1395. The Menedez Amendment would not only increase near-term legal immigration by more than 100,000 each year, it would remove even the façade that the bill would end chain migration. Specifically, it would change the cut-off date for reducing the “backlog” of family-sponsored immigration applicants from May 1, 2005, to January 1, 2007, the same date by which illegal aliens must have been unlawfully present in the United States in order to receive amnesty under this bill. It also adds 110,000 green cards a year for adult children and sibling backlog reduction. The Menedez Amendment failed by a vote of 53 to 44.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to increase chain migration in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Akaka Amendment (SA 1186) to S. 1387 The Akaka Amendment would exempt children of Filipino World War II veterans naturalized pursuant to the Immigration Act of 1990 from numerical limits on worldwide immigration. This additional exemption from caps on visa issuance would serve only to increase the flow of immigration into the United States.The Akaka Amendment passed by a vote of 97 to 9.

Major Numbers in All Categories
top
Voted on Senate floor in favor of guestworker-amnesty bill by voting in favor of cloture motion to end debate and bring bill to a vote in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture and limit debate on S. 1639, thereby preventing it from moving toward a final vote. S. 1639 is the “corrected and updated” version of S. 1348, the guestworker-amnesty bill that would: grant an amnesty; authorize the importation of millions of new foreign workers; and do little to curb our illegal immigration crisis. Two days prior to this vote, the Senate had voted to invoke cloture and move forward with the debate on S. 1639, outside normal channels and bypassing the committee process. Two weeks prior to this vote, the Senate rejected cloture on the “grand bargain” substitute amendment to S. 1348 by a 45-50 margin, thus halting – for the time being – the bill’s progress toward final passage. President Bush then stepped in to plead with Senate Republicans to give the “compromise” another look. Senate Majority Leader Reid chose to bring the proposal back to the Senate as a new bill, S. 1369. This motion to invoke cloture on S. 1639 (the second motion) failed by a vote of 46 to 53.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of guestworker-amnesty bill by voting in favor of a motion to bring bill to the Senate floor for a debate and a vote in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture and bring S. 1639, the “corrected and updated” version of S. 1348, the guestworker-amnesty bill that would grant an amnesty, would authorize the importation of millions of new foreign workers, and would do little to curb our illegal immigration crisis, to the Senate floor. Two weeks prior to this vote, the Senate rejected cloture on the “grand bargain” substitute amendment to S. 1348 by a 45-50 margin, thus halting – for the time being – the bill’s progress toward final passage. President Bush then stepped in to plead with Senate Republicans to give the “compromise” another look and Senate Majority Leader Reid then brought the proposal back to the Senate as a new bill, S. 1369. The motion to invoke cloture passed by a vote of 64 to 35.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of guestworker-amnesty bill by voting in favor of motion to limit debate and move to vote in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the second cloture motion on the "grand bargain" substitute amendment (SA 1150) to S. 1348, the guestworker-amnesty bill that would grant an amnesty, would authorize the importation of millions of new foreign workers, and would do little to curb our illegal immigration crisis. The motion to invoke cloture would have ended the debate on the "compromise" proposal and limited further discussion of amendments to a previously-agreed upon set of proposals -- thus a vote against cloture was effectively a vote in favor of killing the amnesty-guestworker bill. The motion to invoke cloture failed by a vote of 45 to 50.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to kill border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Manager's Amendment (SA 4188), offered by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Manager's Amendment made many minor changes to S. 2611, none of have significant numeric impacts on the overall bill. However, the Manager's Amendment included a provision that requires consultation with the government of Mexico concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures along the international border between the United States and Mexico. This would virtually guarantee that the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border would never be completed. The Manager's Amendment passed by a vote of 56 to 41 to 1 (the 1 denotes a "present" vote).

Voted in favor of bill to increase immigration and grant amnesty to illegal aliens in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of final passage of S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. S. 2611 would dramatically change most occupations and communities in America with the largest movement of foreign workers in world history. Specifically, S. 2611 would: reward approximately 10.2 million illegal aliens with an amnesty allowing them to permanently take American jobs and become U.S. citizens; entice millions more foreign workers to illegally enter our communities, crowd the housing and schools, take the jobs and depress the wages because they reasonably can believe they eventually will be given an amnesty, too; double legal immigration from 1 million to 2 million a year; give out permanent green cards to up to 66 million foreign workers and dependents over the next 20 years. The main difference in terms of numbers between the final version of S. 2611 and the version of the bill when the cloture motion was invoked was that the Bingaman Amendment to cap the number of employment-based visas for workers, spouses and children at 650,000 was adopted after cloture but before final passage. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation estimates that the Bingaman Amendment would reduce employment-based visas available under S. 2611 by about 150,000 a year. S. 2611 passed by a vote of 62 to 36.

Voted in favor of motion to invoke cloture on S. 2611 to increase overall immigration numbers and reward illegal aliens with amnesty in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The motion to invoke cloture was a procedural move to ends debate on S. 2611. If the motion had been rejected by at least 40 Senators, Majority Leader Bill Frist, MD (R-TN) would have had to choose between continued debate on S. 2611 and moving on to other legislative business. If the motion had failed, Sen. Frist was expected to move on to other legislative business, thus effectively killing the bill. S. 2611 provides an indirect path to citizenship for illegal aliens. S. 2611 also provides for major increases in temporary worker visas and permanent immigrant visas. It provides for at least an additional 100,000 H-1B visas annually; an additional 325,000 new guestworker visas (H-5A/H-2C visas); a one-time-only permanent increase of 310,660. In addition, the S. 2611 includes amnesty for an estimated 10.2 million illegal aliens (about 6.7 million illegal alien workers and 3.5 million illegal aliens spouse and/or children). The cloture motion passed by a vote of 73 to 25.

Voted in favor of motion to invoke cloture on bill to increase overall immigration numbers and reward illegal aliens with amnesty in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on SA 3424, a "compromise amnesty" proposal by Sens. Hagel (R-NE) and Martinez (R-FL). This was a procedural vote that was highly tied up in partisan politics. Although it is impossible to know just why one voted against cloture, most of those voting for cloture did so because they wanted the bill to be passed in a succeeding vote. Therefore, most of the votes against cloture were votes against the amnesty. The Hagel-Martinez proposal was put forth as an alternative to the Senate Judiciary Committee-passed amnesty proposal. The Hagel-Martinez proposal differs from the Judiciary Committee proposal in that it provides an indirect path to citizenship for illegal aliens as opposed to the direct path outlined in the Judiciary Committee proposal. It only allows illegal aliens who have been in the country for more than 5 years to stay in the United States and adjust to legal status. Those who have been here less than 5 years but more than two years would be required to exit the country and return through the a land port of entry with a visa. Over time, qualified individuals would have the chance to become citizens. The Hagel-Martinez compromise also provides for major increases in temporary worker visas and permanent immigrant visas. It provides for at least an additional 100,000 H-1B visas annually; an additional 325,000 new guestworker visas (H-5A/H-2C visas); a one-time-only permanent increase of 310,660; and a total annual increase in permanent immigrant visas of at least 1,154,700. In addition, the Hagel-Martinez compromise includes amnesty for an estimated 10.2 million illegal aliens (about 6.7 million illegal alien workers and 3.5 million illegal aliens spouses and/or children). The cloture motion failed by a vote of 38 to 60.

Importing Specific Foreign Workers
top
Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to sunset proposed guestworker program in 5 years in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Dorgan Amendment (SA 1316) to S. 1348 that sunsets the Y-1 "temporary" nonimmigrant nonagricultural worker program five years after enactment. The Dorgan Amendment had been voted on by the Senate two weeks prior to this vote and it failed by a vote of 48 to 49, but this time the Senate voted to pass it by a vote of 49 to 48.

Voted in favor of amendment to S. 1348 to increase H-1B visa fees in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Sanders Amendment (S. 1223) to S. 1348. The Sanders Amendment would raise the fees employers who wish to import H-1B high-skill nonimmigrant workers from $1,500 to $10,000, with the funds going to scholarships for American high tech students. The Sanders Amendment passed by a vote of 59 to 35.

Voted on Senate floor for amendment to sunset proposed guestworker program in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Dorgan Amendment> (SA 1181) to S. 1348 to sunset the bill's guestworker provisions in five years. The Dorgan Amendment failed by a vote of 48 to 49.

Voted in favor of amendment to cut proposed guestworker program in half in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Bingaman Amendment (SA 1169) to S. 1348, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007. The Bingaman Amendment would reduce the annual importation of workers under the new guestworker programs proposed by S. 1348 from 400,000 to 200,000 workers per year. The Bingaman Amendment passed by a vote 74 of 24.

Voted against amendment to cap employment-based visas in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Bingaman Amendment (SA 4131) to to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Bingaman Amendment would cap the number of employment-based visas for workers, spouses and children at 650,000. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation estimates that the Bingaman Amendment would reduce employment-based visas available under S. 2611 by about 150,000 a year. The Bingaman Amendment passed by a vote of 51 to 47.

Voted in favor of amendment to limit proposed guestworker program in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Dorgan Amendment (SA 4095) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Dorgan Amendment would have prohibited the issuance of new H-2C "guestworker" visas after five years, but authorized DHS to continue to extend the authorized stay of an H-2C alien after that date. This would have reduced the number of new guestworkers under S. 2611 from two million to one million (200,000 per year for five years instead of 10 years). The Dorgan Amendment failed by a vote of 48 to 49.

Voted against amendment to create additional guestworker visa categories in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Hutchison Amendment (SA 4101) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Hutchison Amendment would require the State Department to grant a Secure Authorized Foreign Employee (SAFE) visa to a national of a NAFTA or CAFTA nation who meets specified requirements. The "E" visa is already a visa for treaty-trader countries, thus the Hutchison Amendment would have just created more unnecessary "guestworker" categories. The Hutchison Amendment failed by a vote of 31 to 67.

Voted to kill amendment to prevent guestworkers from getting greencards in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to table the Kyl amdendment (SA 3969) to S. 2611. The Kyl amendment would have removed provisions allowing guestworkers admitted under S. 2611 to adjust status to that of lawful permanent resident on the basis of their status as a guestworker. This would have prevented 200,000 guestworkers a year from gaining greencards, resulting in 2 million less greencards over a decade. The motion to table the Kyl amendment passed by a vote of 58 to 35, effectively killing the amendment.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to postpone guestworker-amnesty program until borders secured in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Cornyn Amendment (SA 3691, proposed for Sen. Isakson) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Cornyn Amendment would prohibit DHS from implementing any guestworker program or granting amnesty as proposed by the bill unless the agency has certified that this bill’s border security measures and increases in Federal detention space have been completed and are fully operational. The Cornyn Amendment failed by a vote of 40-55.

Voted on Senate floor against killing amendment to strike guestworker provisions from immigration bill 2006
Sen. Obama voted against a motion to table the Dorgan Amendment (SA 4017) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Dorgan amendment would have stricken the guestworker provisions of the bill that would add an estimated 8.4 million foreign workers and their dependents over the next ten years (according to a May, 2006 study by the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector). The motion to table passed by a voted of 68 to 29, effectively killing the Dorgan amendment.

Voted on Senate floor against killing amendment to cap guestworker visas in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against a motion to table the Bingaman Amendment (SA 3981) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . This was a procedural move to terminate further discussion of the amendment. The Bingaman amendment (submitted by Sen. Bingaman for himself and Sen. Feinstein) would cap the number of H-2C visas available annually for issuance at 200,000 and remove the 20% a year increase in annual guestworker visas. This would reduce the 10-year increase in foreign workers and their dependents from 8.4 million, as provided in the original bill, to two million. The motion to table the Bingaman amendment failed by a vote of 18 to 79 and the Bingaman amendment ultimately passed by voice vote.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to increase worker protections in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Cornyn amendment (SA 3965) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Cornyn amendment (submitted for himself and Sen. Grassley) would offer modest protections for American workers from being displaced by a foreign worker by prohibiting H-2C visas for employers unless they attest that they will employ an alien in the offered job position and DHS certifies that there are not sufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified, and available to fill the position. The Cornyn amendment passed by a vote of 50 to 48.

Voted on Senate floor for amendment to weaken worker protections in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Kennedy amendment (SA 4066) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Kennedy amendment weakens Sen. Cornyn's amendment (SA 3965) by not requiring Federal certification of the employer's need to import foreign workers. The Kennedy amendment passed by a vote of 56 to 43.

Voted against amendment to strip foreign-worker increase in 2005
Sen. Obama voted against the Byrd Amendment to S. 1932, the Budget Reconciliation bill. The amendment, introduced by Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), would have stripped ALL immigration increases from the Budget Reconciliation bill and replaced the increase with a provision to impose a $1,500 fee on employers who hire certain non-immigrants. The immigration increase was added to the Budget Reconciliation bill by the Senate Judiciary Committee as a result of an 14-2 vote in favor of an amendment introduced by Senator Arlen Specter. The Specter plan would increase permanent, employment-based immigration by nearly tripling the number of foreign workers who can enter the U.S. each year. As well, it exempts workers’ families from the 140,000-visa cap on employment-based immigration. It also raises the cap on employment-based permanent immigration by adding each year the lesser of 90,000 visas or any “unused” employment-based visas from any prior year. Altogether, these provisions could generate a net increase in permanent immigration of 366,000 aliens, or about one-third of current, annual legal immigration. Senator Byrd’s amendment was cosponsored by Sens. Sessions (R-AL) and Durbin (D-IL). It was also supported by the AFL-CIO. The Byrd Amendment failed by a vote of 14 to 85.

Voted to protect American workers by voting against foreign worker importation program in 2005
Sen. Obama voted against S. 1307, the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (CAFTA). CAFTA does not does NOT include any explicit language about visas. It does, however, include language in chapters 10 and 11 that is virtually identical to the language in other FTAs that creates the expectation of a right of immigration. It is expected that, like NAFTA, CAFTA will generate an increase in illegal immigration. CAFTA, like other recent FTAs, covers four "modes" of delivery of services between countries (Cross Border, Consumption Abroad, Commercial Presence and Movement of natural persons). Although there is nothing in the text of the agreement that would provide a single extra visa to the United States, by using language on Mode 3 and Mode 4 delivery of services that is identical or virtually identical to that in all recent FTAs, the USTR has allowed for the creation of an expectation of immigration. In other words, the foreign investors and service providers who read the agreement may easily believe that it will give them the right to enter the United States either to invest in a service providing company here or to go to work for a subsidiary from the home country. (Remember that Congress only has the authority to approve or reject free trade agreements; it many not amend them because of the President's fast track authority. Once Congress gives its approval, it may not pass laws that restrict or alter the provisions of the trade agreement, or the United States will be subject to trade sanctions.) CAFTA passed the Senate by a vote of 54 to 45.

Voted in favor of amendment to increase foreign-worker importation in 2005
Sen. Obama voted in favor of S. Amdt. 387, an amendment offered by Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), to H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005. The Mikulski amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act increased the number of H-2Bs who can enter and take jobs in the United States in the next two years and apportioned the H-2B visa cap so that visas will be available throughout the year. Specifically, the Mikulski Amendment would split the H-2B visa cap so no more than 33,000 visas are made available for the first six months the fiscal year, and another 33,000 visas would be available in the second half of the year. HOWEVER, the Mikulski Amendment exempts from the annual cap aliens granted an H-2B visa within three years prior to approval of an H-2B petition, thus potentially TRIPLING the number of H-2B workers in the United States at any one time. Although apportioning H-2B visas is a common-sense approach that will help prevent the situation that occurred in FY 2004 and FY2005 when the 66,000 annual cap on H-2B (low-skill) nonimmigrant visas was hit within the first quarter of the year, the Mikulski Amendment would ultimately harm American workers by creating exemptions which potentially could triple the number of H-2B workers in the U.S. at any given time. Fortunately, however, the increase is limited to two years, and the additional visas can go only to foreign workers who worked in this country legally during the last three years. The Amendment passed by a vote of 94 to 6.

Citizenship for Illegal Alien Babies
top

Sen. Obama has taken no action to reduce
the rewarding of illegal immigration by giving citizenship
to anchor babies.


Inviting/Repelling Illegal Aliens
top
Voted in favor of sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2008
Sen. Obama voted in favor of tabling an amendment (SA 4309) sponsored by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) to (S. Con. Res. 70), a concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2009. The Vitter Amendment, if adopted, would have created a reserve fund to ensure that Federal assistance does not go to sanctuary cities that ignore the immigration laws of the United States and create safe havens for illegal aliens and potential terrorists. Sanctuary policies bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. In 1996, Congress passed a law that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The Vitter Amendment would have been a huge incentive for states and municipalities to rescind their sanctuary policies. The vote to table the Vitter Amendment passed 58 to 40, effectively killing the amendment.

Voted in favor of rewarding illegal aliens with amnesty in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on S. 2205, The "Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act of 2007." The DREAM Act amnesty would not just offer U.S. citizenship to illegal alien teenagers, it also would provide amnesty to the parents of most of them. An analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies found that the DREAM Act would offer amnesty to 2.1 million illegal aliens (Once the amnestied teens become citizens they can obtain an amnesty for their parents. The motion to invoke cloture failed by a vote of 52 to 44 (60 YES votes were needed for cloture to pass and to prevent a filibuster). Click here to read a summary of the bill.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to increase enforcement and delay amnesty in 2007
Sen. Obama voted against the Coburn Amendment (SA 1131) to S. 1348. The Coburn Amendment would have added some teeth to the underlying measure's so-called enforcement "triggers" and would surely have delayed the granting of any amnesty to illegal aliens or the importation of any additional "temporary" nonimmigrant workers. Specifically, the Coburn Amendment required DHS, in addition to the mechanisms needed to "trigger" implementation of the bill's amnesty and guestworker provisions, to certify the implementation of various border security and interior enforcement measures (e.g., all statutorily-required border fencing has been constructed, US-VISIT is fully operational, "sanctuary cities" are prohibited, denying aliens who are likely to become public charges admission into the United States, etc.). It also required the president to certify that all of these "triggering" mechanisms are fully implemented and operational and, subsequently, required Congress to approve the certification – all of this prior to implementation of amnesty and guestworker provisions. The Coburn Amendment failed by a vote of 42 to 54.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to create a disincentive to amnesty in 2007
Sen. Obama voted against the Cornyn Amendment (SA 1250) to S. 1348. The Cornyn Amendment prohibits illegal aliens seeking amnesty under this bill (in this case, "probationary status") from submitting "sworn affidavits from nonrelatives" as proof of unlawful work or unlawful presence in the United States. It eliminates provisions protecting the confidentiality of the information contained in amnesty applications and, instead, requires the sharing of application-related information upon the request of a law enforcement agency, intelligence, or national security agency, or DHS component when requested in connection with a duly-authorized investigation of a civil violation. The Cornyn Amendment would not only serve as a disincentive for illegal aliens to seek amnesty, but it also would encourage cooperation between the Federal government and state and local governments in the effort to do what has not been done enough in recent decades – enforce our immigration laws. The Cornyn Amendment passed by a vote of 57 to 39.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to increase illegal immigration in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Bingaman Amendment (SA 1267) to S. 1348 to The Bingaman Amendment would have removed the requirement that Y "temporary" nonimmigrant workers (as provided for in the underlying legislation) leave the United States before they renew their visas – not by modifying the length of their authorized stay (i.e., up to six years), but by mandating that they be given visas that expire after two years and that are renewable twice. By not requiring "temporary" workers to even prove their status as "guests" in our country, this amendment would encourage more visa overstays and further disregard for the rule of law. The Bingamen Amendment failed by a vote of 41 to 57.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to bar certain criminals from United States in 2007
Sen. Obama voted against the Cornyn Amendment (SA 1184) to S. 1385 to establish a permanent bar for gang members, terrorists, and other criminals. The Cornyn Amendment would have permanently barred from admission into the United States, and denied immigration benefits (including legal status under the amnesty in this bill), to: (1) absconders (i.e., aliens already ordered deported); (2) aliens deemed inadmissible or deportable as security risks (e.g., terrorists); (3) aliens who fail to register as sex offenders; (4) aliens convicted of certain firearms offenses; (5) aliens convicted of domestic violence, stalking, crimes against children, or violation of protection orders; (6) alien gang members; and (7) aliens convicted of at least three DUIs. The Cornyn Amendment failed by a vote of 46 to 51.

Voted against amendment to strip amnesty provisions from S. 1348 in 2007
Sen. Obama voted against the Vitter Amendment (SA 1157) to S. 1348. The Vitter Amendment would strike the amnesty provisions of the bill. The Vitter Amendment failed by a vote of 29 to 66.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to increase interior enforcement in 2007
Sen. Obama voted against the Coleman Amendment (SA 1158) to S. 1348 to enable state and local officials to inquire about a person’s immigration status for law enforcement and benefit application purposes. The Coleman Amendment would make it more difficult for illegal aliens to benefit from sanctuary policies (already explicitly prohibited under Federal law). The Coleman Amendment failed by vote of 48-49.

Cosponsoring bill to reward illegal aliens with in-state tuition and amnesty in 2007
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 774, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors [DREAM] Act of 2007. S. 774 would grant in-state tuition and amnesty to illegal aliens under the age of 21 who had been physically present in the country for five years and are in 7th grade or above. Such a reward for illegal immigration serves as an incentive for more illegal immigration.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to deter employers from hiring of illegal aliens in 2007
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Sessions Amendment to H.R. 2, the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007. The Sessions Amendment (S. Amdt. 100) would prohibit employers who hire illegal aliens from receiving government contracts. This would serve as a disincentive to hire illegal aliens and a step toward removing the job-magnet for illegal immigration. The Sessions Amendment passed by a vote of 94-0.

Cosponsoring bill to create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers in 2007
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 340, the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits, and Security Act of 2007. S. 340 is an amnesty for agricultural workers. Of the 1.2 million illegal aliens currently working in agriculture, an estimated 860,000 plus their spouses and children could qualify for this amnesty, so the total could reach three million or more. The potential recipients of the amnesty will be required to prove at least 863 hours or 150 work days of agricultural employment in two preceeding years. S. 340 would, subsequently, allow these “blue card” illegal aliens to apply for legal residency (i.e., amnesty), provided they demonstrate that they have worked in agriculture here: (1) 100 work days per year each of the first five years following enactment; (2) 150 work days per year each of the first three years following enactment; or (3) over the course of the first four years after enactment, 150 work days per year for three of those years and 100 work days for the other. The AgJOBS amnesty has also been introduced as S. 237. Read an analysis of the AgJOBS amnesty.

Cosponsoring bill to create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers in 2007
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 237, the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits, and Security Act of 2007. S. 237 is an amnesty for agricultural workers. Of the 1.2 million illegal aliens currently working in agriculture, an estimated 860,000 plus their spouses and children could qualify for this amnesty, so the total could reach three million or more. The potential recipients of the amnesty will be required to prove at least 863 hours or 150 work days of agricultural employment in two preceeding years.S. 237 would, subsequently, allow these “blue card” illegal aliens to apply for legal residency (i.e., amnesty), provided they demonstrate that they have worked in agriculture here: (1) 100 work days per year each of the first five years following enactment; (2) 150 work days per year each of the first three years following enactment; or (3) over the course of the first four years after enactment, 150 work days per year for three of those years and 100 work days for the other. Read an analysis of the AgJOBS amnesty.

Voted in favor of border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of final passage of H.R. 6061, the Secure Fence Act of 2006. H.R. 6061: requires the Department of Homeland Security to construct 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border; provides for the installation of additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors in five specified lengths (encompassing approximately 700 miles) along the United States’ southwestern border; requires DHS to study the necessity, feasibility, and economic impact of constructing a similar barrier along the U.S.-Canada border; enhances border infrastructure, including checkpoints, roads, and vehicle barriers; and requires DHS to achieve and maintain "operational control" of our borders within 18 months of enactment and require reports on the progress toward this goal. The Senate passed H.R. 6061 passed by a vote of 80 to 19.

Voted in favor of amendment to fund border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Sessions amendment to H.R. 5631, the Department of of Defense Appropriations bill for 2007. This was an amendment to appropriate $1.8 billion for the construction of border fencing and vehicle barriers along the southern border. The amendment, sponsored by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), would fund the fencing and barrier provisions proposed by S. 2611 which passed the Senate in late May. A fence is one of the most effective tools for preventing illegal migration. The Sessions Amendment passed by a voted 94-3.

Voted against amendment to fund additional immigration investigators in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Sessions Amendment to H.R. 5441, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill for 2007. This was an amendment to add about $86 million for 800 more staff to investigate immigration law violations, offset by reductions in other programs. The Sessions Amendment failed by a vote of 34 to 66.

Voted against amendment to extend border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Sessions Amendment to H.R. 5441, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill for 2007. This was an amendment to add 370 miles of fence on the Southwest border paid for by $1.8 billion in offsets from other programs. A fence is one of the most effective tools for preventing illegal migration. This amendment would have funded the fence provided for in the Senate-passed bill (S. 2611). The Sessions Amendment failed by a vote of 29 to 71.

Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to kill border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Manager's Amendment (SA 4188), offered by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Manager's Amendment made many minor changes to S. 2611, none of have significant numeric impacts on the overall bill. However, the Manager's Amendment included a provision that requires consultation with the government of Mexico concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures along the international border between the United States and Mexico. This would virtually guarantee that the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border would never be completed. The Manager's Amendment passed by a vote of 56 to 41 to 1 (the 1 denotes a "present" vote).

Voted in favor of amendment to make two million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Feinstein Amendment (SA 4087) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Feinstein Amendment would have made an additional two million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty by replacing the bill's "earned legalization" amnesty and Deferred Mandatory Departure provisions with a one-tiered scheme in which all aliens illegally present in the United States on or before January 1, 2006, are granted amnesty and an "orange card" (instead of the normal "green card" that lawful permanent residents are issued) if they are otherwise admissible. The, after a 6-8 year period, orange card holders are allowed to adjust to Lawful Permanent Resident status if they pay a $2,000 fine. The Feinstein Amendment failed by a vote of 37 to 61.

Voted to authorize National Guard to assist in border patrol efforts in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Ensign Amendment (SA 4076) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Ensign Amendment authorizes the Governors of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas - with Defense Department approval – to order their state's National Guard units or personnel to assist in border patrol efforts (with certain restrictions) along the United States' southern land border. Even though the National Guard would not be directly participating in the apprehension of illegal aliens, they would facilitate the work of the Border Patrol. The Ensign Amendment passed by a vote of 83-10.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to create border fence in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Sessions amendment (SA 3979) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Sessions amendment requires DHS to construct at least 370 miles of triple-layered fencing and 500 miles of vehicle barriers in other areas along the southwest border that DHS determines are areas that are most often used by smugglers and illegal aliens attempting to gain illegal entry, and requires that construction thereof be completed within two years. This physical barrier would help deter illegal entry into the United States. The Sessions amendment passed by a vote of 83 to 16.

Voted on Senate floor against amendment to remove amnesty provisions from immigration bill in 2006
Sen. Obama voted against the Vitter amendment (SA 3963) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . Sen. Vitter submitted the amendment for himself, Sens. Chambliss, Grassley, and Santorum. The Vitter amendment would remove provisions authorizing the “earned legalization” and “agricultural worker” amnesty schemes that would grant amnesty to an estimated 16 million illegal aliens and their families (according to a May, 2006 study by the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector). The Vitter amendment failed by a vote of 33 to 66.

Voted on Senate floor to kill amendment to prevent Social Security for illegal aliens in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of a motion to table the Ensign amendment (SA 3985) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 . The Ensign amendment (submitted for himself, Sen. Santorum, and Sen. Inhofe), would have prohibited the payment of Social Security benefits based on quarters of coverage earned by an individual who has not at some point had a valid Social Security number. This would have addressed part of the problem of aliens getting Social Security credit for work performed while they were illegally present in the United States (aliens who came in on temporary work visas, but overstayed their visas, would continue to get credit for all work performed, including after they became illegal). The motion to table the Ensign amendment passed by a vote of 50 to 49, effectively killing the amendment.

Voted in favor of amendment to increase funding for local and state law enforcement in 2006
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Bingamen Amendment to S. 2454. The Bingaman Amendment authorizes DHS to award grants to a state, local, or tribal law enforcement agency located in a county within 100 miles of a U.S. border with Canada or Mexico, or in a county beyond 100 miles that has been certified by DHS as a "high impact area," to provide assistance in addressing: (1) criminal activity that occurs by virtue of proximity to the border; and (2) the Federal government's failure to adequately secure its borders. Authorizes appropriations of $50 million annually, for fiscal years 2007 through 2011, to implement this grant program. Although this amendment does not require the establishment of the grant program and caps the amount available for implementation of the program it could, potentially, bring these agencies more into the enforcement fold. The Bingaman Amendment passed by a vote of 84 to 6.

Cosponsoring bill to reduce illegal immigration by requiring employment eligibility verification in 2005-2006
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 1917, the Employment Verification Act of 2005. S. 1917 would establish a mandatory electronic worker verification system that would be phased in on a two to five year basis. Requiring employers to use an electronic employment eligibility verification system is an important component of preventing illegal aliens from taking jobs from those who have the legal right to work in this country.

Voted against amendment to increase detention beds for illegal aliens in 2005
Sen. Obama voted against the McCain amendment (S. Amdt. 1171) to H.R. 2360, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. The McCain amendment would have increased the number of detention beds in the United States consistent with the number authorized in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. The McCain amendment failed by a vote of 42 to 56.

Cosponsoring bill to reward illegal aliens with in-state tuition and amnesty in 2005-2006
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 2075, the DREAM Act of 2005. S. 2075 would grant in-state tuition and amnesty to illegal aliens under the age of 21 who had been physically present in the country for five years and are in 7th grade or above. Such a reward for illegal immigration serves as an incentive for more illegal immigration.

Voted against amendment to provide funding for additional Border Patrol agents in 2005
Sen. Obama voted against the Ensign Amendment (SA 1219) to H.R. 2360, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill. The Ensign Amendment transfers appropriated funds from the Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the purpose of hiring 1,000 additional Border Patrol agents. The amendment failed by a vote of 38 to 60.

Cosponsoring massive guestworker-amnesty bill in 2005-2006
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 1033, the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act . S. 1033 clearly spells out a path to jobs and residency for illegal aliens. Among the significant immigration-increase provisions of the bill are: a new visa category (H-5A) for 400,000 low-skill foreign workers (this cap can be adjusted upwards); a provision for the H-5A temporary workers to apply for permanent resident status after four years; a new temporary 6-year visa category (H-5B) for illegal aliens (and their spouses and children) already in the country; an amnesty for illegal aliens who apply for an H-5B visa and pay a $2,000 fine; an increase of 150,000 visas per year for employment-based immigrants; and an exemption of immediate relatives (spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens) from the annual level of 480,000 family-sponsored immigrant visas thereby providing 254,000 additional visas to the family preference categories. S. 1033 contains modest measures to increase border security such as creation of a Border Security Committee and creation of a new electronic work authorization system that would eventually replace the current "I-9" system. S. 1033 would also require the federal government to reimburse hospitals for the cost of providing emergency health care to H-5A and H-5B workers. Companion legislation, H.R. 2330, has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), and Jim Kolbe (R-AZ).

Voted in favor of amendment to provide funding for additional Border Patrol and ICE agents in 2005
Sen. Obama voted in favor of the Byrd Amendment (S. Amdt. 516) to H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief of 2005. The Byrd Amendment provides $390 million to hire 650 more border patrol agents, 250 new immigration investigators, and 168 new immigration enforcement agents and deportation officers. The Byrd amendment also provides funds for 2,000 additional detention beds as well as funding to train the new personnel. Passage of the Byrd Amendment sent a strong signal from the Senate in favor of increased Border Patrol and Interior Enforcement. The Byrd Amendment passed by a vote of 65 to 34.

Cosponsoring bill to create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers in 2005-2006
Sen. Obama is a cosponsor of S. 359, an amnesty for agricultural workers. Of the 1.2 million illegal aliens currently working in agriculture, an estimated 860,000 plus their spouses and children could qualify for this amnesty, so the total could reach three million or more. The potential recipients of the amnesty would be required to prove 100 days of agricultural employment in the 18-month period that ended Aug. 31, 2004. Then, prior to receiving amnesty, workers would have to show 360 days of additional farm work over the next six years.



Tell Senator Obama what you think of his immigration record.
Phone: (202) 224-2854
Fax: (202) 228-4260
E-Mail: email available via website.
Website: http://obama.senate.gov/
D.C. Address: U.S. Senate, 713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
District Offices 1911 52nd Avenue
Moline, IL 61265
(309) 736-1217 (V), (309) 736-1233 (F)
230 South Dearborn St.
Suite 3900
Chicago, IL 60654
(312) 886-3506 (V), (312) 886-3514 (F)
607 East Adams Street
Springfield, IL 62701
(217) 492-5089 (V), (217) 492-5099 (F)
701 North Court Street
Marion, IL 62959
(618) 997-2402 (V)
1911 52nd Avenue
Moline, 61265
(309) 736-1217 (V)


Tell us if you think you see even the tiniest error on this page
 
 
 
video
 
Barack Obama now denies the existance of the radical left wing liberal group ACORN community organizer Obama FRAUD ...
 
 
 
video
 
[TRANSLATED] Atta
Senator Barack Obama wants to give Driver's Licenses to people who are here illegally. People like Mohammad Atta and the ...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

International Profit Associates, AKA IPA, The Consultants From Hell

Latest on IPA : Illinois Attorney General - Madigan Files Lawsuit Against ...

Apr 22, 2009 ...International Profit Associates takes advantage of small businesses by painting
... Madigan's lawsuit alleges that IPA employs deceptive, ...

www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2009_04/20090422.html – Similar pages

IPA,
International Profit Associates Nationwide Ripoff scam rips-off small business Buffalo Grove Illinois

See also http://gabriellecusumano.blogtownhall.com/default.aspx?mode=post&g=3d91b78f-6b34-446c-aef0-08d5a5ddcb22&comments=true for informative article (insight from past  employees on International Profit Associates. 

Business Consulting ripoff to Small Businesses - FOX 6 News uncovered International Profit Associates promises to help small businesses. Business owners nationwide say they are hit with huge fees, over billing, shoddy services & broken promises. Investigative reporter John Mattes goes undercover & confronts the company's representatives.

International Profit Associates, The consultanting firm from hell as many previous and unhappy clients will testify to.

Previous postings to Townhall about International Profit Associates.
 
  • Townhall.com - Gabrielle Cusumano

    Posted by Gabrielle Cusumano on Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:14:42 PM ... Record of International Profit Associates Hillary R. Clinton Contribution from ...
    gabriellecusumano.townhall.com/g/3d91b78f-6b34-446c-aef0-08d5a5ddcb22&comments=true - 72k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
     
  • Townhall.com - Gabrielle Cusumano

  • Posted by Gabrielle Cusumano on Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:01:44 PM ... The bottom half that contains info about International Profit Associates (IPA) ...
    gabriellecusumano.townhall.com/2007/04 - 482k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
    More results from gabriellecusumano.townhall.com »

    Townhall.com - Gabrielle Cusumano

  • Posted by Gabrielle Cusumano on Thursday, December 06, 2007 12:03:00 PM ... International Profit Associates 2007 Campaign Contributions Excerpted from ...
    gabriellecusumano.blogtownhall.com/.../federal_sexual_harassment_and_rico__lawsuit_defendents_ipa_and_sen_hillar... - 64k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
     

    Townhall.com - Gabrielle Cusumano

    Posted by Gabrielle Cusumano on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:32:25 PM ... Al Gore, CyberCop, Sanford Robinson, International Profit Associates' RICO Lawsuit, ...
    gabriellecusumano.blogtownhall.com/2007/05 - 976k

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

     
     
    I run a small business in Chicago and I made the mistake of agreeing to let these guys "drop off some information". This led to an unannounced visit by a sales rep whose pitch on how the IPA "consultants" would save me big $$$ and improve our business lasted over an hour. When I said I was going to take a pass he got angry and said he wasn't going to leave until I agreed to talk to his boss on the phone. By the way, this "sales rep" guy had a massive shiner and a cast on his right hand - When I asked what happened to him he said he didn't want to talk about it. Again I declined to speak to "his boss" (from what I learned later was a phone closer) and called my brother out of his office to help me show him the door. He left without incident and I thought WTF was that all about? Needless to say I thought I had heard the last from IPA. Boy was I wrong.

    I googled IPA after the rep left and for the next two hours I read facisnating tales of company owners swindled out of their hard earned money, disgruntled former employees talking about the inner workings of IPA; and there was even a Forbes story of the IPA president, getting caught banging a hooker on the conference room table of his previous job.

    For the next two weeks these guys called me everyday and hassled me. They were relentless. I told them I knew everything about their scam, I read the Forbes article, don't ever call me again, ect. They would call back and want to "drop off an article disproving" the Forbes one. I started getting more aggressive: I told them to F*** Off, that they should be ashamed of themselves for what they do to small businesses owners. Still they kept calling. It was never the same person on the other end of the phone, so would have to go through the same litany of insults.

    Finally, I said if I got one more call from them I was going to contact the IL Att General; and that was the end.

    For the love of God, do not give these $%^&&** a red ^&*%^%^ cent!!!
    _____________________________________________________________

     
    International Profit Associates, IPA/ IBA Scammed For $48,000.00 By IPA Buffalo Grove IllinoisAuthor: Davie, FloridaCorrupt Companies : International Profit AssociatesIllinois
     
    95.
    11/29/2007 9:27:28 AM
    New
    Rebuttal
    International Profit Associates If they harass me one more time, there will be a hit out!!! Buffalo Grove Illinois*Consumer Comment ..Hope This HelpsAuthor: El Paso, TexasBusiness Consultants : International Profit AssociatesIllinois
    100.
    11/10/2007 11:32:00 AM
    New
    International Profit Associates IPA-IBA HELD 48 Hours as a FINANCIAL HOSTAGE! Nashville, TN IllinoisAuthor: Hendersonville, TennesseeCorrupt Companies : IPA - IBAIllinois
     Also  This Pertinent Info:
     

    Tuesday, April 3, 2007

    Hillary Clinton Donor Money Came From Scam Artists

    Hillary Clinton Donor Money: Two Multi-Million Dollar RICO Suits Filed Against International Profit Associates By Group Of Plaintiffs

    Mar 15 2007 —
    Hillary Clinton along with several other influential politicians have failed to return campaign donations that appear to be directly connected to an alleged scam which defrauded small to medium sized businesses across the United States and Canada of millions of dollars over more than ten years. In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois-Eastern Division, the law firm of Reda & Des Jardins, LTD on Tuesday filed a multi-million dollar RICO lawsuit (Case No. 07C 1425) against one of Hillary Clinton’s top campaign donors, International Profit Associates (IPA).

    This is the second multi-million dollar lawsuit filed in less than two weeks against Buffalo Grove, Illinois-based IPA. Another similar filing took place on February 26, in Albany, New York.

    Clinton received over $145,000 in campaign donations from those closely affiliated with IPA. Since the article, most politicians that received donations from IPA have since returned the money back to IPA; the plaintiff’s believes Clinton is an exception.

    http://tinyurl.com/2fxfjy

     

    3 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    No wonder Hillary is the largest campaign fundraiser in Amercain History. Does anyone know is she is taking money from Iran or Saudi Arabia too? She is a disgust to our own political system. Who wants to elect a liar and cheat to run our country. The White water scandal has that already been forgotton? What Americain in their right mind would vote for such a dishonest person. She has no morals. The media and press are just ignoring the facts, she needs to be put in her place and the Americain people need to stand up and state we will not tolerate this behavior. Our founding fathers would be disgusted with her tactics.

    Anonymous said...

    You are so, so, so right. Hillary is a disgrace to our country. Unfortunately, the retort will be that "everyone else is doing it". So what? Didn't our children try that on us? And our response was, well, they are not my children.

    Our founding fathers left us with incredible rules with which to govern this country. No where did it allow corruptness, lies, or cheating,

    Let's get back to basics.

    HD

    Anonymous said...

    As for International Profit Associates, this has to be the largest scam in history against small to medium size businesses.

    It's example, George S. May International, has been doing this since the 1920's. Difference is that back then, small business owners just hung their head in shame for being hoodwinked - or they found the scoundrel and hung them from the nearest tree, or shoot them dead.

    While I don't yearn for those good ole days, people who commit scams on the public must be punished and put out of business.

    So, John Burgess, after a short stint at George S. May to learn their "methods" took a group (known at George S. May as the 'coup') and started International Profit Associates.

    They struggled in the beginning like most start-ups and, at first, it seemed that IPA was going to be an honest business consulting firm. But, true to John Burgess form, the company grew wildly and quickly, always with one thought in mind - make John Burgess rich.

    The man is shrewd. He made it a point to hire lawyers and CPA's for consultants. Little did they know that their first line of defense was John Burgess. John didn't care if they had been disbarred, like himself, they still knew the law. He could get someone who had a license to sign the papers he wanted.

    International Profit Associates is and has always been a sales organization. The hell with benefit - get the money. Even analysts have described themselves as salespeople who just happen to do an analysis - shallow as the analysis is.

    Since International Profit Associates beginning in 1991, they have had horrendous legal bills, most of their own doing. Oh, yes, George S. May sued them for taking their supposedly unique methods, and Burgess won those cases, simply because the methods are not unique. Today you can even find them for free on the internet.

    The bulk of the legal fees were paid to defend IPA against angry former clients and employees. Don't know the number of cases, but was told once it was well over 300 since 1991. And that does not even count those former clients who don't bother to sue.

    Evidence of discontent is via the over 400 complaints to the Better Business Bureau. Of course, Burgess dismisses those by saying that someone at George S. May is on the board of directors at the BBB so are black balling Burgess. Yeh, right. The numbers speak volumes.

    Complaints to the Illinois Attorney General have done no good since Lisa Madigan also received monies from Burgess. Get the picture, John Burgess buys protection - his bevy of inhouse lawyers who are all well paid plus he buys the politicians. Have no idea how many judges he has bought.

    Now, finally, 19 plaintiffs are standing their ground. This complaint filed in Federal Court is huge. Huge because it details - yes, details - the total scam. Exhibits include the Sales Training Manual as well as the Analysts Training Manual.

    If you want to educate yourself against scams go to http://www.ipaclient.com and follow the links to read the entire complaint as well as the exhibits (two separate links).

    And if you have $6 to spare, go to http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b01/en/common/item_detail.jhtml?id=801397 , the Harvard Business Review site. and buy the study done on IPA a number of years ago. That was a HUGE selling point used UNTIL the study was published and it exposed Burgess' vile ways. Of course, IPA, in usual form, puts an entirely different spin on it on their site.

    So, this is the kind of guy Hillary is connected with - she even has used IPA's private jet. Oh, did I mention the sexual harrassment case filed against John Burgess and IPA? Not just one - started at over 160 women, Burgess bragged that he got it down to 116. EEOC says it is one of the largest cases ever. Yet the case has yet to be settled, fines or punishment levied since Burgess and his bevy of legal staff continue to stall.

    Sounds like Hillary to me.

    HD

     
  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »