About Me

Name: Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

US Surrenders Educational Institutions To Islamic Radicals

" In Islamic academies in America, with teaching materials from Saudi Arabia and other sources, the academies indoctrinate unequivocal hatred toward non-Muslims, and deep suspicion of our Western values."

US Surrenders Educational Institutions to Islamic Radicals
 
January 30, 2009 | Herb Denenberg
  • There’s growing evidence that America may be meeting its educational Waterloo and that our educational system is being captured by radical Islamists. As Robert Spencer put it so well in his classic book, The Stealth Jihad, radical Islam is subverting America without guns or bombs. The radical Islamists have scored dramatic victories in determining what students are taught in America about Islam, and we don’t even seem to know what is happening. The radical Islamists have managed a massive penetration of our educational system that teaches everyone from the youngest students all the way up to students at our colleges...
  • Here is what the radical Islamists are doing at all educational levels, according to Mr. Spencer:

    “Of all the arenas in which the stealth jihad is advancing, one of the most crucial is in our schools, where stealth jihadists have found a welcoming environment among teachers deeply steeped in the credo of multiculturalism. With the mandate of ‘tolerance’ robbing many educators of their ability to evaluate non-Western cultures critically, teachers are highly susceptible to an organized campaign by U.S.-based Islami c organizations and their primary benefactors, Saudi Arabia, to present a view of Islam that whitewashes its violent history and intolerant religious imperatives.”

  • In other words, if you can’t evaluate other cultures and decide whether our culture is better, you’re hardly in a position to defend your own culture against the rising tide of its enemies, including the radical Islamists also known as islamofascists.

    You can’t effectively defend your culture if you think all cultures are pretty much the same.

    The radical Islamist have launched a two-pronged assault on our educational system at the pre-college level:

    1. In Islamic academies in America, with teaching materials from Saudi Arabia and other sources, the academies indoctrinate unequivocal hatred toward non-Muslims, and deep suspicion of our Western values.

    2. The opposite approach is taken in our mainstream schools. U.S.-based Islamic groups place lesson plans and other educational materials that are about the opposite of the antagonistic materials placed in Islamic academies. In the mainstream public schools this is what Mr. Spencer says takes place: Islamic instruction “presents a picture of Islam that is so pristine and peaceful that it sometimes crosses the boundary from mere pro-Muslim bias to outright Islamic proselytizing.

    So the radical Islamists are not only indoctrinating young students but may well be on the road to converting them to Islam.


    The findings of a study released in June 2008 by the American Textbook Council, an independent national research organization that evaluates the quality of textbooks, finds where we are now with educational materials used in our schools. Mr. Spencer says here is what it found about what ten of the most widely used middle school and high school social studies textbooks teach. They “present an incomplete and confected view of Islam that misrepresents its foundations and challenges to international security.” Mr. Spencer writes, “The report found that the books present highly tendentious constructions as undisputed truth, making common cause with West-hating multiculturalists to bowdlerize the presentation of Islam,..." (more of this article at the link below) Excerpted from The Bulletin at: http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2009/01/30/herb_denenberg/doc49827b3a09877642712166.txt
  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Pledge of Allegiance Becomes Pledge to Obama" NewsBlaze.com

    "All of the kids in each class faced the President, instead of the flag that hangs in the corner."
     
    Children Forced to Pledge to Obama
    Hopey Change has reached an elementary school in Sin City:
     
    At least three of the five classrooms have an overhead projector and as the children stand to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, the teacher turns on the classroom overhead and a full body image of Obama, with six U.S. flags behind him, comes up about 4 feet away from the flag that hangs on the wall. The screen is apparently around five feet by six feet.
     
    In the image, President Obama appears to be staring straight out with no facial expression, just a serious look. All of the kids in each class faced the President, instead of the flag that hangs in the corner.
     
    Original article here: Published: January 27, 2009
     
    Pledge of Allegiance Becomes Pledge to Obama
    By Alan Gray, NewsBlaze
    Excerpted from:
    http://newsblaze.com/story/20090127224509nnnn.nb/topstory

    A parent in the Clark County School District of Las Vegas, Henderson area reported January 27th that his son, who is in 1st grade, came home yesterday saying that he didn't want to go back to school anymore.

    When asked why, the boy said that during the Pledge of Allegiance the teacher put up a large image of Obama next to the flag.

    Thinking that the boy might be exaggerating, the man asked his son if he was sure, and suggested that by "large" he might mean an 8x10 photo of the president. The boy apparently said "No, it is a large picture of Obama and when we are done, the teacher turns off the image."

    The same thing was not done for President Bush last year.

    After investigating this morning, the other parent reported that what the boy said was true.

    At least three of the five classrooms have an overhead projector and as the children stand to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, the teacher turns on the classroom overhead and a full body image of Obama, with six U.S. flags behind him, comes up about 4 feet away from the flag that hangs on the wall. The screen is apparently around five feet by six feet.

    In the image, President Obama appears to be staring straight out with no facial expression, just a serious look. All of the kids in each class faced the President, instead of the flag that hangs in the corner.

    Local parents are up in arms over this situation. Teachers clearly do not realize the gravity of what they are doing.

    Update Jan 28th: The parents spoke to the Vice-Principal this afternoon. He said he would take care of it. I will check with them tomorrow and update this story.

    Update Jan 29th: The teachers at the school today talked to the children about flag etiquette and the meaning of the flag and why the pledge is made. The lights were left on in the room, so the flag could be clearly seen and the children were told that they should face towards and look at the flag. The parent spoke to the Principal and the child's teacher. The Principal said they would not show the image of the president at the same time as the pledge tomorrow. The Principal apologized for causing offense. The parent and Principal and teacher left on good terms. (More of this article at the link)

     
    It is not a hoax.
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Report: Barack Obama's Al Qaida initiative began months before his election

    "Al Qaida has offered what has been described as a truce in exchange for a U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, according to the report. "  
    Barack Obama was working with Arab intermediaries to establish an unofficial dialogue with Al Qaida long before his election. Excerpted from: http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2009/ss_terror0079_01_28.asp
    Report: Barack Obama's Al Qaida initiative began months before his election 
    WASHINGTONBarack Obama was working with Arab intermediaries to establish an unofficial dialogue with Al Qaida long before his election as the 44th U.S. president, according to a report in the upcoming weekly edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com.    ShareThis

    Al Qaida has offered what has been described as a truce in exchange for a U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, according to the report.

    Obama has deemed the U.S. reconciliation with the Muslim world, including Iran, as his main foreign policy goal, sources quoted in the report said. The president has been aided by several Persian Gulf Arab Muslims with ties to Al Qaida's leadership in Pakistan, they said.
     
    On his first day in office, Obama ordered the shutdown of the U.S. Navy prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which where 245 suspected Al Qaida members are detained.
     
    Obama spoke about his own ties to the Muslim world:

    "Now, my job is to communicate the fact that the United States has a stake in the well-being of the Muslim world, that the language we use has to be a language of respect," Obama said . "I have Muslim members of my family. I have lived in Muslim countries."

    "My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy — we sometimes make mistakes — we have not been perfect," Obama said.
     
     
    Related Article:
     
    Islamist Group Urges al-Qaeda for Temporary Truce

    25/01/2009


    Cairo, Asharq Al-Awsat- The Egyptian Islamist movement Jamaat Islamiya has called for Al Qaeda to adopt a four-month truce and to cease any operations against the United States, the West and other countries, as they await “the fair, practical stances of the new American president.” Its request came shortly after Al Qaeda leader Abu Yahya al Libi urged for attacks to be launched on Western states, especially the US and Britain, to avenge Israel’s attacks on Gaza and for Britain’s role in supporting the establishment of a homeland for the Jews in 1948.

    Sheikh Najih Ibrahim, a theorist and leading figure of the Jamaat Islamiya group in Egypt told Asharq Al-Awsat that the movement fears that Al Qaeda may carry out operations and launch attacks in the upcoming period and as a result, turn President Barack Obama into “another George W. Bush.” The group fears that Obama would change his position regarding withdrawing from Afghanistan and Iraq and shutting down the US prison at Guantanamo Bay whereas America under George W. Bush occupied Afghanistan and Iraq and detained Islamists in Guantanamo Bay in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

    “Whether or not Libi called for attacks to be launched against Britain, we fear that Al Qaeda could carry out operations that would turn Obama into another George W. Bush and turn something positive into something negative. No one will benefit from this except Israel,” said Shiekh Najih Ibrahim.

    A repeat of Al Qaeda attacks “will be a victory for Israel and those who share the opinion of George W. Bush that this violence is a characteristic of Islam. We, the Jamaat Islamiya group, want the best for Islam and Muslims and we have hope that the Al Qaeda of today is different to the Al Qaeda of 9/11,” he added.

    The statement signed by Sheikh Essam Derbala, a prominent leader of the Egyptian Jamaat Islamiya addressed the Al Qaeda organization saying, “Tell them (Western states) without fear: We will not start fighting except in self-defense over the next four months as we wait for Obama’s fair, practical stances. We welcome permanent peace based on respect for the Islamic identity and the right of our people to live independently according to their creed and religious law, based on common interest with America and the world and for the sake of humankind away from the clash of civilizations.”

    The statement addressed “all Al Qaeda supporters, whether they are part of the movement or just agree with its ideology, but especially the leaders of the organization in all places, and particularly Sheikh Osama Bin Laden and Sheikh Dr. Ayman al Zawahiri.”

    The statement referred to the new American president’s desire to follow a new direction. “Addressing the Islamic world, Obama said we are in need of a new direction. So he is calling for adopting a new approach that differs to the blocked and irrational path that Bush followed.”

    Derbala stated that the new president’s approach is based on common interests and mutual respect and that Obama had said that American generations faced communism and fascism not just with missiles and tanks but with alliances and with dialogue. His approach carried a peaceful message to the world and he said that he would extend his hand to those who extend their hands in peace and announced his intention to withdraw American forces from Iraq in an easy way and would try to establish peace, which is difficult to achieve, in Afghanistan.

    Derbala added, “These positions – Obama announcing a diplomatic approach towards Iran and its nuclear file, his willingness to close Guantanamo Bay, and his request that judges suspend trials for four months in Guantanamo Bay – show that there is a new opportunity that must be explored and not thrown away before making sure that it is just a mirage.”

    Derbala called upon the Al Qaeda leadership to extend its hand in peace. He said, “What harm would it cause if you told Obama what you want and you said: we extend our hand in peace based on common interests and achieving good for humankind. We extend our hand for the sake of peace and achieving independence for Iraq and Afghanistan. We extend our hand for the sake of peace and realizing the hopes of our Islamic nations so that we can live under Islamic rule in accordance with our creed based on the rules of Sharia that we cherish and defend.”

    According to the Jamaat Islamiya statement, there were other conditions for peace between the Al Qaeda organization and the United States: “the fair demands of our Ummah in Palestine, Kashmir, Chechnya, Bosnia and Kosovo,” and “the release of prisoners such as Dr Omar Abdul Rahman,” and that “America abandons it policy of double standards with regards to the Islamic world and its bias towards Israel,” as well it “[working towards] achieving communication between civilizations and not clashes.” Excerpted from: http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=1&id=15497
     
     Recognizing Al Qaeda?

    25/01/2009


    In his inauguration speech, US President Barack Obama extended his hand to the Islamic world and greeted it. He spent his first day in the White House making historical decisions; the most important of which was the decision to shut down the US prison at Guantanamo Bay and the network of American CIA ghost prisons.

    Obama called Middle East leaders and spoke to them about the issues that concern the Arab and Islamic world, demonstrating his determination to keep an eye on these issues from day one of his presidency. Moreover, Washington’s special envoys were appointed for the Middle East and for Pakistan and Afghanistan.

    Obama’s decisions and speeches, which express good intention towards our region, received diverse responses. The oddest response came from Colonel Muammar Gaddafi of Libya who called for Washington to review its approach towards Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden and to give him a chance to reform. Gaddafi also called for engaging in a dialogue with Bin Laden to understand his motives.

    The Jamaat Islamiya group also made a suggestion, for Al Qaeda however and not Washington. It called for the Al Qaeda organization to announce a four-month truce with the West and to give Obama a chance in order to verify the new US president’s fair stances.

    It is strange that Jamaat Islamiya in Egypt asked Al Qaeda not to turn Obama into another George W. Bush! Does this mean that we have recognized Al Qaeda? Does Jamaat Islamiya’s request mean that if Obama does not act in a way that satisfies Al Qaeda then the terrorist organization can do what it wants?

    With regards to dialogue with Al Qaeda, who would be authorized to represent the terrorist organization? What I fear most is that one of the states yearning for a regional or international role would come out and call for a reconciliation conference with Al Qaeda to be held on its territory!

    What is frustrating about this proposal is that it shows that we have not yet fully understood the danger of Al Qaeda’s ideology and the essence of its goals despite all the crimes that the terrorist organization has committed not only in West but also in our Arab states over the past eight years.

    The biggest mistake that we are making is to believe that a mere change of heart from an Al Qaeda member means that we have weakened the organization. Let us say for the sake of argument that Osama Bin Laden came out and said that he regretted everything that he has done to mankind and the Islamic religion (and this is very unlikely), would this mean the end of Al Qaeda? Of course not. Just as the saying goes, the stream will find its way no matter what. Someone will emerge who will outbid the Al Qaeda leader and declare that Bin Laden no longer represents them. They will surpass him with ease and will seek to eliminate him as well.

    The danger of Al Qaeda does not lie in its members but in its ideology. Calling for a dialogue with Al Qaeda alone is evidence of the extent of our shortsightedness and our failure to understand what is more of a threat to us than to the West. What we need is to tackle the threat posed by Al Qaeda’s ideology rather than Al Qaeda members.

    What we need is to direct all our energy towards eliminating this ideology and to fight ideology with ideology. We must not show it any tolerance let alone hint at giving it another chance to exist; this would mean that we are giving such extremist thinking legitimacy and the opportunity to exist once again.

    Interaction with Washington and Obama is important, especially with regards to what concerns us. But if our reactions are going to resemble those that are mentioned above, then this will be frustrating, not for Washington, but for us, the people of the region who are hoping for a better future.
    Excerpted from:  http://asharqalawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=15495
     
    Need more?
     
    CBS Reports:
     
    November 24, 2008

    Jamaa Islamiya Hopes Obama Would Release The Blind Sheikh

    (al Jama’a al Islamiya )
    The Egyptian group al Jama’a al Islamiya released an Internet statement expressing satisfaction at Barack Obama’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The formerly militant group listed three reasons for welcoming Obama’s election. The group argued that electing a man reflects values that were deeply rooted in Islam. It also said Obama’s election puts an end to the “Bush era” and finally, it gives the group home that Obama might consider releasing Omar Abdel Rahman, the group’s spiritual leader who is now serving time in the U.S. for his involvement in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

    From: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/11/24/monitor/printable4631002.shtml
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

    "Barack Obama was working with Arab intermediaries to establish an unofficial dialogue with Al Qaida long before his election."

    Question: If this is true isn't this illegal?
     
    Answer: If this is true, he commited a crime ..

    18 U.S.C. Section 953

    Sec. 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments

    Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.  tx eggman
     
    Conducting Foreign Relations Without Authority: The Logan Act http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33265.pdf
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Robert Malley could be Obama's Pre-election Mouthpiece to Al Qaida.

    Robert Malley is the hand-picked foreign adviser to potential presidential nominee Barack Hussein Obama.

    Robert Malley advocates negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

    Malley has written numerous opinion articles, many of them co-written with a former adviser to the mass murderer Yasser Arafat, petitioning for “dialogue” with Hamas and blasting Israel for harming “the Palestinian cause”.

    Malley also wrote a an article in the NY Times blaming Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000, while ignoring the fact that Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and eastern sections of Jerusalem and instead chose to launch a Muslim terrorist campaign against the legitimate and sovereign Jewish state.

    In February 2006, after Hamas won a majority of seats in the Palestinian parliament, Malley wrote an op-ed for the Baltimore Sun advocating international aid to the terror group’s newly formed government.

    Robert Malley was a special assistant to Clinton for Arab-Israeli affairs and was a member of the U.S. peace team during the Camp David negotiations.

    He currently serves as director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at the International Crisis Group, which is partially funded by billionaire and Obama campaign contributor George Soros, who also serves on the board of the Crisis Group.

    Ed Lasky, a contributor to the American Thinker blog, calls Malley a “[Palestinian] propagandist” who, he charged, bends “the truth to serve an agenda that is marked by anti-Israel bias. … Malley’s writings strike me as being akin to propaganda.”

    Lasky points out Malley’s father, Simon Malley, was a personal friend of Arafat and wrote in support of numerous struggles against Western countries. Simon Malley founded Afrique Asie, a French magazine that was known for its advocacy for “liberation” struggles throughout the world, including the Palestinian cause.

    Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, called Simon Malley a “sympathizer” of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, which, headed by Arafat, carried out numerous terror attacks.

    Read more about Barack Hussein Obama’s hand-picked terrorist-loving adviser, here.

      Excerpted from: http://smoothstoneblog.com/2008/01/who-is-robert-malley.htm                                       
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Economists slam Barack Obama's stimulus package, Pelosi Writes Panic Memo

    "That memo shows that her bunched up panties have more wrinkles than her upper lip. (sorry for the visuals!)"
    Comment #2 about "Is Pelosi Panicking? Leaked Memo Lashes Out at Republicans" posted by laweeks at: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30473&page=2#c1
    This is a memo from Speaker Nancy Pelosi's communications director, Brendan Daley, to Democratic members and staff sent after the stimulus vote yesterday. Pelosi is apparently panicked at Republicans’ success in uniting against her hyperpartisan actions in shutting them out of the formulation of the stimulus bill and in peeling nearly a dozen Dems off to vote in opposition.

    Here is the full text of the memo leaked to HUMAN EVENTS this morning. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30473&page=2#c1

    Must Read Comments: (
    175
    )
     
    "...at the exact time when economists of every ideological stripe agree that government investments are the only way to get our economy moving again and make us competitive for the long term." Pelosi

    Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. I would direct your attention to the full page ad in the NY TIMES signed by over 200 economist that said just the opposite.
    Jan 29, 2009 @ 10:53 AM Michael Hamm, Charlottesville, Va
    .Click to view all
     
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Reference


    Economists slam Barack Obama's stimulus package

    The line from Barack Obama and Joe Biden is that all economists agree with a stimulus package to expand government spending. So they won't have been happy to see a full page advertisement in (January 28's) New York Times disagreeing, signed by around 200 academic economists, including three Nobel prize-winners.

    (T)he economists who signed the advert, funded by the Cato Institute in Washington DC, say that: "we the undersigned do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan's "lost decade" in the 1990s."


    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    White House Will 'Create Crisis' and 'Panic' to Push Stimulus" Sen. Jim DeMint

     
    "this administration knows that they’re not going to get a quick reaction out of Congress unless they create crisis and widespread panic. And that’s going to be their M.O. to get Congress to act.”
     
    Senator Warns White House Will 'Create Crisis' and 'Panic' to Push Stimulus
    Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., criticizes mainstream media for not reporting loads of pork in proposed legislation. 

    By Jeff Poor
    Business & Media Institute
    1/27/2009 5:04:03 PM
    Excerpted from:
     
    Excerpted from: Business & Media.Org at:

    Is the new Obama administration taking cues from the Bush administration to get Congress to act? It certainly seemed that way to, South Carolina’s junior Republican senator, Jim DeMint.

     

    DeMint, speaking Jan. 27 at The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., explained the Obama administration will “create crisis and widespread panic” just like its predecessor in order to get Congress to act expeditiously.

     

    “I’ve been around long enough to know whenever someone tells me I have to make a decision right now, my response is no,” DeMint said. “That clears it up right away and I think more and more the Bush administration and now this administration knows that they’re not going to get a quick reaction out of Congress unless they create crisis and widespread panic. And that’s going to be their M.O. to get Congress to act.”

     

    Another senator, James Inhofe, R-Okla., explained the Bush administration used a similar tactic, under the direction of former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, to get the $700-billion TARP bailout bill passed by Congress back on Oct. 4, 2008.

     

    DeMint said some Republicans now regret they voted for the TARP package, even though there is no way to gauge what might have happened had it not been passed.

     

    “I think there’s a lot of buyer’s remorse among Republicans who voted for the bailouts of all kinds last year,” DeMint said. “And, it’s hard to prove that, some of them are saying, ‘It didn’t work out so well, but it’d been a lot worse if we hadn’t.’ It’s hard, it’s hard to argue that unless you know anything about how business works.”

     

    “And then it’s obvious that what we did was inject a whole lot of uncertainty into the marketplace,” DeMint said. “So no, I don’t think there’s discord because of that, uh, and I really don’t blame my colleagues. If you got the President and the Secretary of the Treasury coming in saying, ‘The world economy is going to collapse next week if we don’t do something.’”

     

    DeMint criticized the mainstream media for not conveying the message that some congressional Republicans are trying to spread about this package –that it’s filled with big-government wasteful spending projects that will do little to “stimulate” the economy. (More of this article at link)

    Excerpted from: Business & Media.Org at:
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Obama Working For The Muslim World. His Words: "My job to the Muslim world is to ..."

     "My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy," Poor choice of words or is Obama a Trojan Horse?
     
     
     
    Photobucket

    Obama to Muslims: US is ‘not your enemy’

    January 27, 2009

    BY PAUL SCHEMM

    President Barack Obama chose an Arabic satellite TV network for his first formal television interview as president, part of a concerted effort to repair relations with the Muslim world that were damaged under the previous administration.

    Obama cited his Muslim background and relatives, practically a taboo issue during the U.S. presidential campaign, and said in the interview, which aired today, that one of his main tasks was to communicate to Muslims “that the Americans are not your enemy.”

    The interview on the Dubai-based Al-Arabiya news channel aired as Obama’s new envoy to the region, former Sen. George J. Mitchell, arrived in Egypt today for a visit that also will take him to Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

    Obama said the U.S. had made mistakes in the past but “that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there’s no reason why we can’t restore that.”

    Obama’s predecessor, former President George W. Bush, launched wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which prompted a massive backlash against the U.S. in the Muslim world.

    In contrast to the enthusiastic reception Obama’s victory has garnered around the world, the Arab world has been much more cautious about the new U.S. president - with most people skeptical that American policy in the region will change substantially.

    “I can’t be optimistic until I see something tangible,” said Hatem al-Kurdi, 35, a Gaza City engineer who saw parts of the interview. “Anyone can say nice words, but you have to follow with actions.”

    “He seems very interested in the Middle East issue but he didn’t say exactly what he’s going to do about it,” Kurdi added.

    After earlier dismissing Obama as following the same policies as his predecessor, officials from the militant Palestinian Hamas group softened their stance against the new president today.

    “In the last couple of days there have been a lot of statements (from Obama), some of them very positive, and choosing this George Mitchell as an envoy,” said Ahmed Youssef, a senior Hamas official interviewed on the Doha-based Al-Jazeera news network. “I think there are some positive things we have to count.”

    Obama’s choice of Al-Arabiya network, which is owned by a Saudi businessman, follows the lead of the Bush administration, which gave several presidential interviews to that news channel.

    “The U.S. sees Al-Arabiya as a friendly Arab channel, whereas they see Al-Jazeera as confrontational,” said Lawrence Pintak, director of the journalism training center at the American University in Cairo.

    Hady Amr, director of the Brookings Doha Center, an arm of the U.S. think-tank in the Qatari capital, described decision to make the first presidential interview with an Arabic news network as “stunning.”

    “President Obama has made it absolutely clear ... that a central priority will be repairing America’s relations with the Muslim world,” he said. “If that’s his objective, I’d say he’s been hitting home run after home run.”

    In the interview, Obama called for a new partnership with the Muslim world “based on mutual respect and mutual interest.” He talked about growing up in Indonesia, the Muslim world’s most populous nation, and noted that he has Muslim relatives.

    Obama’s Kenyan father was born Muslim, though a self-described atheist, and many of his relatives in Kenya are practicing Muslims. As a child, Obama lived for a number of years in Indonesia while his mother as doing research there.

    This appeal does seem to have struck a chord among many Muslims.

    “He’s different from the previous presidents, perhaps because of his color or his Islamic background. My views of America are different now than they were during the Bush administration,” said Youssef Ali, 45, who works for the Iraqi Electricity Ministry in Baghdad.

    Most of Obama’s interview focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is widely perceived in the Middle East as the most pressing issue in a region filled with animosities.

    Obama said he felt it was important to “get engaged right away” in the Middle East and had directed Mitchell to talk to “all the major parties involved.” His administration would craft an approach after that, he said.

    “What I told him is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating,” Obama told the interviewer.

    The president reiterated the U.S. commitment to Israel as an ally and to its right to defend itself. But he suggested that both Israel and the Palestinians have hard choices to make.

    “I do believe that the moment is ripe for both sides to realize that the path that they are on is one that is not going to result in prosperity and security for their people,” he said, calling for a Palestinian state that is contiguous with internal freedom of movement and can trade with neighboring countries.

    On Tuesday, Gaza’s fragile truce was threatened when a bomb detonated by Palestinian militants exploded next to an Israeli army patrol along the border with Gaza, killing one soldier and wounding three.

    Obama also said that recent statements and messages issued by the al-Qaida terror network suggest they do not know how to deal with his new approach.

    “They seem nervous,” he told the interviewer. “What that tells me is that their ideas are bankrupt.”

    In his latest message on Jan. 14, al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden said Obama had been left with a “heavy inheritance” of Bush’s wars. Shortly after the election, the network’s number two, Ayman al-Zawahri described Obama with a demeaning racial term for a black American who does the bidding of whites.

    The message suggested the terror network was worried Obama could undermine its rallying cry that the U.S. is an enemy oppressor.

    “There’s no actions that they’ve taken that say a child in the Muslim world is getting a better education because of them, or has better health care because of them,” said Obama about al-Qaida.

    Obama also emphasized the importance of engaging with Iran, a country the Bush administration often singled out as the most dangerous in the region.

    Obama condemned Iran’s threats against Israel, pursuit of nuclear weapons and support of terrorist organizations, but said “it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress.”


    Comment # 2  by  Key Largo  Found at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2172735/posts
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Excerpted from an "Exclusive" in the Sun UK  at: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2070998.ece
     
    Al-Qaeda's suicide 3 YouTube tribute
    Evil intent ... al-Qaeda suicide bombers bragging on YouTube video

    Evil intent ... al-Qaeda suicide bombers bragging on YouTube video

    A SICK video of three suicide bombings has been posted on YouTube by al-Qaeda.

    Terror experts say the film is a twisted “tribute” to the assassins — and a warning of attacks to come in Britain and elsewhere.


    Click on the slideshow below to see more pics:

    Click here for slideshow


    The posting on the world’s most popular website was timed to coincide with Glasgow Airport bomber Bilal Abdulla beginning his jail stretch.. For more go to:
    The Sun UK .
    Excerpted from an "Exclusive" in the Sun UK  at: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2070998.ece
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Al-Qaeda YouTube Warning To Britain

    Posted: 26 Jan 2009 06:50 PM PST

    AL-Qaeda last night issued a chilling video threat to Britain — on YouTube.

    Rants by key henchmen of Osama bin Laden are accompanied by footage of a black-clad gunman riddling the Union Flag with bullets.

    The Stars and Stripes is also peppered — along with Israel’s flag.

    Fanatic Abu Hareth Muhammad al-Oufi — a former Guantanamo Bay inmate — vents his fury at the West while fondling an automatic rifle and brandishing a grenade.

    The recording was posted on YouTube, which attracts up to 100million visits a day.

    It was also downloaded to a number of extremist websites with hundreds of thousands of members.

    Analysts said last night the message meant Britain is a revenge target for Israel’s war in Gaza.

    Terror expert Chris Dobson warned: “Al-Qaeda is clearly taking aim at Britain. This makes it obvious, if there was any doubt, we rank alongside the US and Israel at the top of their hate list.”

    Online terror investigator Neil Doyle added: “There has been a noticeable increase in chatter about attacks at the UK.”

    Source

    This story comes to us via Homeland Security - National Terror Alert. National Terror Alert is America's trusted source for homeland security news and information.
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

     
    A comment on Rush Limbaugh's thoughts about Obama's birth certificate issue:
    "Rush just said that Obama isn't afraid of him. With one signature, Obama could spell the end to this show. This has to be why he (Limbaugh) and others will not question the Birth Certificate issue."  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2172798/posts
     
     
    In Reference to Comment:" Dude, the BC is a nonissue. It is only an issue with a tiny portion of a tiny fringe of people who thought it could be an out. BC fanatics are fanatics, hopers and dreamers. There is no BC issue. Get it????? Rush and others would be proclaimed certifiable and rightly so. I repeat it is a nonissue. You are nuts."

    Why are you so afraid of a discussion about the requirement of our Constitution to have our President be native born? To date, Barack Obama has yet to produce a long form birth certificate proving he is native born? Why are you so afraid to discuss this? Does it not disturb you that a part of our Constitution is being ignored? Does it not disturb you that Barack Obama may have perpetrated a fraud? Does it not disturb you that this fraud has been facilitated, not only by his minions within the DNC, but by the MSM as well? Does it not disturb you that we have a judiciary, all the way up to the SCOTUS, who are unwilling to address this? Does it not disturb you that our supposed voices in the media (Rush, Sean, Mark and Laura) are unwilling to touch this issue. Why?

    Maybe I am asking you the wrong questions. Maybe the question to you should be, what affront to our Constitution would it take for you to exhibit some backbone and stand up for it (our Constitution)?

    I often think of those Army Rangers who scaled the cliffs of Pointe du Hoc on D-Day in the face of withering, pointblank machine gun fire. They never stopped their ascent until their goal was accomplished. All to defend our Constitution and our way of life. Are we now going to allow some interloper to skirt around our Constitution and in the process render it meaningless in view of all the sacrifices that have made to date to preserve it?

    Comment # 72 posted by John G45
    _______________________________________________________
    Also this comment was made:

    Obama’s Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach ("cauterized" O’s passport info)

    Obama’s Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach

    Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.

    The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.

    During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.

    Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.

    “They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”

    At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.

    “This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.

    (Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...

    ..

    http://blog.kievukraine.info/2005/08/obama-part-of-group-locked-up-at.html

    Obama part of group locked up at Russian airport // U.S. delegation stripped of passports as guards demand to inspect plane
    Chicago Sun-Times (IL) - Monday, August 29, 2005
    Author: Lynn Sweet, Sun-Times Washington Bureau chi

    WASHINGTON — Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) were not allowed to leave a Russian airport Sunday and were locked in a room briefly.

    The incident prevented their departure for about three hours, but Obama told the Sun-Times “it ended up not being a very big deal.”

    The senators had their passports seized by local officials at an airport in Perm. Obama said the officials demanded, unsuccessfully, to inspect the DC-9 military aircraft being used by the congressional delegation for the trip.

    (snip)

    Although he was on a first-time diplomatic mission, Obama has traveled extensively, spending part of his youth in Indonesia and visiting Kenya, where his father was born. He noted that as a back- packing college student he had “a lot less leverage than this time.”

    Obama , a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Lugar, its chairman, left Wednesday for a trip to inspect sites where nuclear and biological weapons are slated to be destroyed in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan. On Sunday, the U.S. group was scheduled to fly from Perm to Kiev, Ukraine. But border guards wanted proof that the group’s aircraft — which Obama said looked like a “mini-Air Force One” — was really an official U.S. government plane, which would be exempt from an inspection.

    Robert Gibbs, Obama ‘s spokesman traveling with him, said in an e-mail that “the border guards took our passports and demanded to inspect our aircraft, which we refused. We were moved to a room to wait.”

    “At one point they were demanding to inspect virtually everything, including the gifts their representatives at the missile facility had given us.” The border guard said “they were acting on the authority of the FSB,” the Russian intelligence agency.

    (snip)


    Comment # 45 posted by magrief to the posting of an article about:
     
    "Rush just said that Obama isn't afraid of him. With one signature, Obama could spell the end to this show. This has to be why he and others will not question the Birth Certificate issue." located at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2172798/posts
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Obama Declares War On Rush Limbaugh Listeners Via GOP Leaders On Hill

    Rush's Response Today (1/26/09) On His Show (read here)

    "There are two things going on here. One prong of the Great Unifier’s plan is to isolate elected Republicans from their voters and supporters by making the argument about me and not about his plan. He is hoping that these Republicans will also publicly denounce me and thus marginalize me. And who knows? Are ideological and philosophical ties enough to keep the GOP loyal to their voters? Meanwhile, the effort to foist all blame for this mess on the private sector continues unabated when most of the blame for this current debacle can be laid at the feet of the Congress and a couple of former presidents. And there is a strategic reason for this.

    Secondly, here is a combo quote from the meeting:

    “If we don’t get this done we (the Democrats) could lose seats and I could lose re-election. But we can’t let people like Rush Limbaugh stall this. That’s how things don’t get done in this town.”

    To make the argument about me instead of his plan makes sense from his perspective. Obama’s plan would buy votes for the Democrat Party, in the same way FDR’s New Deal established majority power for 50 years of Democrat rule, and it would also simultaneously seriously damage any hope of future tax cuts. It would allow a majority of American voters to guarantee no taxes for themselves going forward. It would burden the private sector and put the public sector in permanent and firm control of the economy. Put simply, I believe his stimulus is aimed at re-establishing “eternal” power for the Democrat Party rather than stimulating the economy because anyone with a brain knows this is NOT how you stimulate the economy. If I can be made to serve as a distraction, then there is that much less time debating the merits of this TRILLION dollar debacle.

    Obama was angry that Merrill Lynch used $1.2 million of TARP money to remodel an executive suite. Excuse me, but didn’t Merrill have to hire a decorator and contractor? Didn’t they have to buy the new furnishings? What’s the difference in that and Merrill loaning that money to a decorator, contractor and goods supplier to remodel Warren Buffet’s office? Either way, stimulus in the private sector occurs. Are we really at the point where the bad PR of Merrill getting a redecorated office in the process is reason to smear them? How much money will the Obamas spend redecorating the White House residence? Whose money will be spent? I have no problem with the Obamas redoing the place. It is tradition. 600 private jets flown by rich Democrats flew into the Inauguration. That’s fine but the auto execs using theirs is a crime? In both instances, the people on those jets arrived in Washington wanting something from Washington, not just good will.

    If I can be made to serve as a distraction, then there is that much less time debating the merits of the trillion dollar debacle.

    One more thing, Byron. Your publication and website have documented Obama’s ties to the teachings of Saul Alinksy while he was community organizing in Chicago. Here is Rule 13 of Alinksy’s Rules for Radicals:

    “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    Rush is dead on target. If Obama is successful in growing those federal and state unions while bribing infrastructure contractors he will have ensured that the Democrat party is entrenched in Washington for years. This warning is Obama telling Republicans that they better play ball if they want some of the slop.

    And he is using Saul’s playbook to a T

    Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

    Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
    The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

    Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

    Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

    Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

    Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

    Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

    Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

    Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

    Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

    Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

    According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”


    Excerpt  via Byron York at The Corner:
     
     
    Last Friday "President Obama warned Republicans on Capitol Hill today that they need to quit listening to radio king Rush Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats and the new administration. "   Go to the Townhall Link below for the whole story and get a taste of what some Americans think about this:

    "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," Obama

    "I won," he said, according to aides who were briefed on the meeting. "I will trump you on that."

    There is a Rush behind every tree!


     
    Comment # 3, Posted by SparkyBass
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Should Timothy Geithner be confirmed? 72 percent of 7016 responses say NO!

    72 percent of 7016 responses say NO!
     
    CNBC Poll: Tell Us What You Think   Excerpted from CNBC at: http://www.cnbc.com/id/28855875 
    Should Timothy Geithner be confirmed as U.S. Treasury Secretary?   * 7016 responses
    Yes
    24%
    No
    72%
    Not Sure
    4.3%
    Not a Scientific Survey. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/28855875  Survey Results
     
    To take ssurvey (after the fact he was confirmed today)
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Real Enough Video of Obama, Biden, Hillary, and the First Lady in the back seat.

    My caption to this video: Obama goes for a joy ride with our "National Security" at stake.  (Get Outta Gitmo)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    The dog is thinking "What a "Dumb A--!"  He missed me by a mile and he thinks he's sooooo funny!"
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," Obama

    "I won," he said, according to aides who were briefed on the meeting. "I will trump you on that."

    Drudge Breaking: President Obama Takes On Rush Limbaugh In New Media War
    By CHARLES HURT, BUREAU CHIEF   (Excerpt)January 23, 2009  Excerpted from:  http://www.nypost.com/seven/01232009/news/politics/prez_zings_gop_foe_in_a_timulating_talk_151572.htmhttp://www.nypost.com/seven/01232009/news/politics/prez_zings_gop_foe_in_a_timulating_talk_151572.htm

    WASHINGTON -- President Obama warned Republicans on Capitol Hill today that they need to quit listening to radio king
    Rush Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats and the new administration.

    "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," he told top GOP leaders, whom he had invited to the White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.

    One White House official confirmed the comment but said he was simply trying to make a larger point about bipartisan efforts.

    "There are big things that unify Republicans and Democrats," the official said. "We shouldn't let partisan politics derail what are very important things that need to get done."

    That wasn't Obama's only jab at Republicans today.

    In an exchange with Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) about the proposal, the president shot back: "I won," according to aides briefed on the meeting.

    "I will trump you on that."  More of this article at the New York Post at: http://www.nypost.com/seven/01232009/news/politics/prez_zings_gop_foe_in_a_timulating_talk_151572.htm
     
     
    "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," he told top GOP leaders, whom he had invited to the White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.

    That wasn't Obama's only jab at Republicans today.

    While discussing the stimulus package with top lawmakers in the White House's Roosevelt Room, President Obama shot down a critic with a simple message.

    "I won," he said, according to aides who were briefed on the meeting. "I will trump you on that."

    The response was to the objection by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Arizona) to the president's proposal to increase benefits for low-income workers who don't owe federal income taxes.
     
    NY Post Reader KBurk 30 writes: I  don't care what you think about Rush Limbaugh, I dont listen to Rush Limbaugh. But this is crossing a line that should never be crossed. When you tell somone to stop listening to somone or else thats where freedom of speech is a profound liberty is a stake. Let me OB a hint if he wants real conservatives not Bush Republicans which are really liberal to listen to him he should tell people to stop listening to MSNBC, I dont tell dont listen to this show, I just dont listen to it and I dont buy anything General Electric, without GE shows like MSNBC would not exist. (More)http://www.nypost.com/seven/01232009/news/politics/prez_zings_gop_foe_in_a_timulating_talk_151572.htm
     
     
    and read the 348 + comments to this article,  the conservative public is getting worked up and it's not over nothing!
     


    Post # 73 posted by rlmorel
     
     
    Now that the Fairness Doctrine issue is out in the open, Rush can concentrate on keeping it before the public. Obama has given Rush a great gift by calling attention to the power that has been given to the new socialist administration to control just about any aspect of American life. The other conservative media will pick up the discussion and the Obama forces will not be able to sneak legislation past the public. Democrats are reverting to their true nature of bullying and coercing the American people to get what they want. Obama was warning Rush to watch his step or else. Rush will make him show his hand and the RATS will wish Obama had not jumped the gun.
    Post # 134 posted  by mountainfolk
     
    Good catch, Cindy. Major Garett's piece gives a little broader view of the exchanges.Obama Says His View on Taxes Prevailed Because 'I Won'

    ............"Obama explained that lawmakers were closer together than the public realized on the stimulus package but warned of pitfalls if Congress and the White House don't work together. Again, according to participants in the meeting, Obama said this about rising above typical partisan differences: "We're all political animals, we've all got political bases," the president is reported to have said. "If we don't get this done we (the Democrats) could lose seats and I could lose re-election. But we can't let people like Rush Limbaugh stall this. That's how things don't get done in this town.""................

    ............"The "I won" comment came after Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., said Republicans believed cutting income taxed would do more to stimulate economic growth than providing a $500 per person payroll tax refund for individuals earning less than $200,000. The president said, according to those present, that this was an important philosophical divide between Republican and Democrats and that it had already been settled -- and would remain settled -- because he won the election."..............

    .............."Democrats called it a light-hearted moment that drew laughs around the table. Republicans said there was laughter but couldn't recall if any of it came from their ranks."...............

    ..............."In the biggest concession of all, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has said the package should pass by mid-February, the Democrats' line-in-the-sand legislative deadline. By refusing to threaten a filibuster to block the bill, McConnell is guaranteeing passage of a bill that reflects Democratic priorities and reaches Obama's desk on his timeline."..............
    Post # 307 posted by Girlene
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Democrats Use TARP to Protect Friends and Shady Bankers" Weekly Standard

    "The Journal later described the provision Frank inserted into the bill to help UnitedOne. Frank apparently recognized that it would prompt unpleasant ethical questions if he simply earmarked money for UnitedOne, so instead he created a pool that would benefit the bank without having to name it: "

    News Flash: Democrats Use TARP to Protect Friends and Shady Bankers

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/01/news_flash_democrats_use_tarp.asp

    The Wall Street Journal  reports on the suspicious case of OneUnited Bank, which received a TARP bailout thanks to Barney Frank, despite running afoul of state and federal regulators due to shady investing and lending practices, as well as the perks it granted to senior executives. The case is an object lesson on the opportunities that massive bills like TARP create for payoffs by those in power, and the power to hide those payoffs. First, the background:

     

    Troubled OneUnited Bank in Boston didn't look much like a candidate for aid from the Treasury Department's bank bailout fund last fall...

    Nonetheless, in December OneUnited got a $12 million injection from the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. One apparent factor: the intercession of Rep. Barney Frank, the powerful head of the House Financial Services Committee.

    Mr. Frank, by his own account, wrote into the TARP bill a provision specifically aimed at helping this particular home-state bank. And later, he acknowledges, he spoke to regulators urging that OneUnited be considered for a cash injection.

     

    The Journal later described the provision Frank inserted into the bill to help UnitedOne. Frank apparently recognized that it would prompt unpleasant ethical questions if he simply earmarked money for UnitedOne, so instead he created a pool that would benefit the bank without having to name it:

     

    Mr. Frank says that in order to protect OneUnited bank, he inserted into the bill a provision to give special consideration to banks that had less than $1 billion of assets, had been well-capitalized as of June 30, served low- and moderate-income areas, and had taken a capital hit in the federal seizure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

    Frank saw fit to provide this legup to OneUnited despite it running afoul of federal regulators:

    The allegations against the bank included "operating without effective underwriting standards and practices," "operating without an effective loan documentation program" and "engaging in speculative investment practices."

    The action also alleged excessive executive compensation. The FDIC ordered OneUnited to "sell all bank-owned automobiles," and to require that executives reimburse the company for any vehicles that had been purchased. The Boston Business Journal reported in November that the bank owns a 2008 Porsche sport-utility vehicle that is registered at the address of OneUnited CEO Kevin Cohee.

    The FDIC also ordered the bank to stop paying for a beachfront house in Santa Monica that, according to the Boston Business Journal, was purchased for more than $6 million in early 2007 by a group that included Cohee and his wife Teri Williams, the bank's president.

    The story would not be complete without a reminder of where OneUnited puts its political support:

    The moves left OneUnited's capital badly depleted. A measure called "Tier 1 risk-based capital" equaled only 1.88% of assets at the bank, versus a desired level of about 6%. A OneUnited lawyer, Robert Cooper, says he called Rep. Frank and Rep. Maxine Waters of California, both Democrats, to complain that the Treasury's move had hurt the bank.

    Rep. Waters heads the House Financial Services subcommittee on housing, and until last spring her husband, Sidney Williams, was a OneUnited director. Rep. Frank, besides heading the Financial Services Committee, has longstanding ties to OneUnited, and recalls having had a deposit account at a predecessor bank in the 1960s.

    But Frank and Waters are not the bank's only friends in Congress. Members of the Board of OneUnited have been extremely generous to many Democratic candidates over the years. Just look here, here and here for examples.

    Right now Congress is considering a stimulus package likely to grow to $1 trillion before the process is over, and there's talk of a multi-trillion TARP II in the near future. Expect hundreds more such tales if those measures pass.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    ...Obama Becomes First President To Skip the "Salute To Heroes" Ball

    "So...my son is over in Afghanistan freezing his A-- off (and risking it) and this guy can't even take a few moments from the adoration of his worshippers and toss a frickin bone to those Americans who fight to keep him and his family safe ??? I must confess, I'm just a little bit taken aback (putting it quite mildly). While not a fan of the guy, I figured he was better than this."
    Posted by: Bigmoo at January 21, 2009

    (1 of 56 Comments, many very irreverent about the 44th POTUS
    )
     
    Obama, First President To Skip the "Salute To Heroes" Ball  Excerpted from:  http://minx.cc/?post=281532
    According to TSO who was at the “Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball”, this newly sworn-in President for the first time in 56 years blew off the ball (that’s 14 Inaugurations).

    Some background on the ball;

    The American Legion sponsors the ball, which recognizes recipients of Medal of Honor, the nation’s highest military award. It started in 1953 for President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s first inauguration.
     
    Event co-sponsors include 13 other veterans service organizations, among them the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Paralyzed Veterans of America.
     
    Read more of this article and its 56 comments at Ace of Spades.
     
    Excerpted from Ace of Spades at: http://minx.cc/?post=281532
     
    YES! THE "SALUTE TO HEROS" IS A REAL BALL!!!!!
    President Bush Thanks Veterans For Service During Inaugural Ball
     
    From: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=24307
    By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA
    American Forces Press Service

    WASHINGTON, Jan. 21, 2005 – President Bush and first lady Laura Bush were greeted with resounding cheers as they made the first stop of their whirlwind tour of inaugural galas Jan. 20 at the Capital Hilton here.

    Click photo for screen-resolution image
    Kenneth Stumpf, an Army squad leader in Vietnam who was awarded the Medal of Honor and the Purple Heart, pledges allegiance to the flag at the "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20. Stumpf said the Medal of Honor belongs to all of those in his squad. "I did not earn this (medal) alone," he said. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA
      

    (Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.
    At the "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball, hundreds of veterans from across the country, along with their wives and families, greeted the president with a resounding show of support.

    Vice President Richard Cheney and his wife, Lynne, stopped in later as they made their way through the inaugural circuit.

    Kenneth Stumpf, one of many Medal of Honor recipients who squeezed through tight security inside the hotel to see the president, was particularly happy to be on hand. "I spent my entire life in the military, so whoever was the president, that was my commander-in-chief," he said. "It just so happens I really like this one."

    The American Legion sponsors the ball, which recognizes recipients of Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award. It started in 1953 for President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first inauguration.

    Event co-sponsors include 13 other veterans service organizations, among them the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Paralyzed Veterans of America.

    With applause and cheers often interrupting his comments, the president used his brief appearance to thank veterans for their service.

    "They have set a fantastic example for those who wear the uniform today," he said. "Our veterans who have served all across the world in the cause of freedom, they have done so in a selfless way and for that, this nation is eternally grateful."

    The president also used the occasion to reiterate points made during his inaugural address, speaking on the importance of freedom and saying that United States will succeed in bringing democracy to Iraq.

    "We believe in freedom, and we know that free societies will be peaceful societies," the president said.

    He also said that by ending tyranny, such as that imposed in Iraq by Saddam Hussein, the United States "Will have fulfilled the obligations of our founding fathers who recognized that every man and woman on the face of the earth should be free."

    With the Joints Chiefs of Staff seated on each side of the podium, the president acknowledged the difficulties being placed on the military. "We've asked hard things of our troops and the families of our troops," he said. But he noted the progress made in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    "Think about what has happened in a very short period of time," he said. "The people of Afghanistan have been liberated by our troops and our friends the Afghans went to the polls by the millions for the first time in 5,000 years," he said. "Very shortly, because of the great work of our military, and the military of our friends, the people of Iraq will be voting. This is a major achievement, and it's a major milestone in the advance of liberty."

    The president admitted that bringing liberty to Iraq "has not been easy," but "it's going to happen," he emphasized.

    "And when it does, our military, and those of us who have been fortunate enough to be involved with our military, will be able to look back and say we did our duty, we did our duty for freedom, and we did our duty for generations of Americans to come."

    Before leaving, the president again expressed thanks to the audience, telling those veterans who have served and those who are now serving, "I am incredibly proud to be your commander in chief."

    Outside the ballroom, Sgt. Maj. of the Army Kenneth Preston was enjoying the night's events and said the president's inaugural address and the theme of the "Salute to Heroes" ball gave recognition to the men and women who wear the uniform.

    "Being an Army at war and supporting a nation at war," he said, "it's important that we recognize our heroes (and) that we pause for a moment and reflect on their courage, their sacrifice and their dedication. I very am proud of what the men and women of the armed forces are accomplishing, and what they stand for in this country."

     

    Biographies:
    Sgt. Maj. Of the Army Kenneth Preston

    Related Sites:
    The American Legion

    Click photo for screen-resolution image President Bush addresses supporters at the American Legion's "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20. The president and first lady Laura Bush made the event their first stop on a tour of inaugural galas. The ball, held since 1953, honors recipients of Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award, and the newly inaugurated president. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample  
    Download screen-resolution   
    Download high-resolution
    Click photo for screen-resolution image Sgt. Varetta Barnes of the 354th Civil Affairs Brigade, Riverdale, Md., came to the "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball hoping to get close to the president. She wanted to present him a booklet of all the things her unit had accomplished during its tour in Iraq, from helping to re-establish the Baghdad Zoo to organizing a business women's association. She also wanted to show him a newspaper clipping with a photo of the president giving her a warm hug during his surprise visit to Baghdad during Thanksgiving 2003. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA  
    Download screen-resolution   
    Download high-resolution
    Click photo for screen-resolution image Air Force Capt. Brad Baxter of the 940th Air Refueling Wing, Beale Air Force Base, Calif., and his wife, Debbie, take a stroll on the dance floor during the American Legion's "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA  
    Download screen-resolution   
    Download high-resolution
    Click photo for screen-resolution image
    The Army Band's brass quintet from Fort Myers, Va., performs patriotic music during the American Legion's "Salute to Heroes" inaugural ball at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA  
    Download screen-resolution   
    Download high-resolution
     
    All of the Above Information is from: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=24307
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Are extremist Islamic groups seeking recruits here in the nation’s largest Somali communities?

    "Officials believe the naturalized American, Shirwa Ahmed,  was on a terrorist team that detonated five car bombs in two northern Somali cities on Oct. 29, killing at least 30 people, including U.N. aid workers."

    LA Times gives more information on the Somali missing men in the US.

    January 18, 2009
     

    The LA Times has a quote that firms up the number missing from Minneapolis but still no word on how many are missing from other US cities where we resettled them at taxpayer expense and gave them an opportunity for a good life.

    The youths, who have U.S. passports, followed a well-trod trail from Minneapolis to Mogadishu. Another group took off in August. The FBI believes that over the last two years, 12 to 20 Minnesotans have gone to Somalia and are believed to have returned to Somalia for terrorist training,.

    As a result, a joint terrorism task force led by the FBI is scrambling to determine if extremist Islamic groups are seeking recruits here in the nation’s largest Somali community — as well as in San Diego, Seattle, Boston and other cities. [Hint to FBI:  be sure you add Lewiston, ME to your list of possible recruitment cities]

    More details on Shirwa Ahmed, the 27-year-old Somali suicide bomber we gave a decent burial to back in December were revealed.  We now know that he was definitely a suicide bomber and he killed UN aid workers among the 30 or so people he blew up. 

    Officials believe the naturalized American was on a terrorist team that detonated five car bombs in two northern Somali cities on Oct. 29, killing at least 30 people, including U.N. aid workers.

    Ahmed phoned his sister in Minneapolis a day before the bombings to say he would not see her again, according to a family friend. “She thought he was sick,” the friend said. The next day, someone else called from Somalia to say he had “gone to paradise” as a martyr for Islam.

    I still would like to know how much the return of Ahmed’s remains cost the US taxpayer.

    The FBI brought back bone fragments and other remains found in Bosaso, one of the blast sites, Wilson said. DNA tests established Ahmed’s identity.

    He was buried in a Muslim funeral in Burnsville, south of Minneapolis, on Dec. 3.

    Ahmed had not been on the FBI’s radar before the bombings. And his death raised fears that someone trained in Somalia might import terrorist tactics to America.

    “There is always a concern about spillover, bleed-out, call it what you will,” said a U.S. official tracking the case who requested anonymity when discussing U.S. intelligence matters. “Especially if they were to return on a U.S. passport.”

    How about that, the FBI didn’t have Ahmed or these other guys on their radar screen.  Guess they didn’t see any need to keep an eye on radical MOSQUES!

    We had heard about one mosque being watched since the men went missing, but this LA Times article adds a second mosque now under scrutiny in the Minneapolis area.

    The leader of another mosque under scrutiny, the Darul Da’wah center in St. Paul, Minn., denied rumors in the Somali community that the alleged suicide bomber and several other missing men were among his followers. (To continue go to: http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/la-times-gives-us-more-information-on-the-somali-missing-men-story/
     

    Holy Cow! Now 40 young Somalis are missing in Minnesota!

    Posted by acorcoran on November 26, 2008

    Update Jan. 18th, 2009:  Los Angeles Times fills in more details.

    Update Dec. 30th:   Washington Times puts story on front page here.

    Update Dec. 29th: The FBI is paying attention to Somalis in U.S.

    Update Dec. 26th:  Scrutinize mosques in the US in wake of missing Somalis investigation.

    Update Dec. 23rd:  Financial Times of London is reporting this story now.  Hat tip:  Jerry Gordon.

    Update Dec. 21st:   UPI reported that the FBI might be taking a harder look at the local mosque, here.

    Wall Street Journal reports that Somali youths are missing from other US cities, here.

    Update Dec. 12th:  CNN gets on the Somali missing men story bandwagon here

    Indepth reporting by Patrick Poole here at Frontpage magazine.

    Update Dec. 8th:  More on missing men in US and Denmark

    Update Dec. 4th:   Somali men missing all over the world tonight.

    Update Dec. 1st:   Minneapolis mosque leaders not allowed to leave country, here.

    Update Nov. 29th:   News Busters says this is not West Side Story.

    Update Nov. 28th:  Somali Jihadists say they are coming to get us!  At Jihad Watch today.

    Update Nov. 27th:  AP story has gone everywhere, on FOX News here.

    Update a couple hours later:  The story is movin’ on up nationally—to ABC now.

    Thanks again to the Baron at Gates of Viennawho just sent news that 40 (four-0) Somali young men have disappeared from the Twin Cities recently.   Two days ago we reported the number at about 20. From 5 Eyewitness News today:

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "He (Obama) got agitated when he was faced with a substantive question. "

    At surprise visit to the White House press corps Thursday night...
     
     

    Obama flashes irritation in press room visit 

    Excerpted by Politico at: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17831.html
    President Obama made a surprise visit to the White House press corps Thursday night, but got agitated when he was faced with a substantive question.

    Asked how he could reconcile a strict ban on lobbyists in his administration with a Deputy Defense Secretary nominee who lobbied for Raytheon, Obama interrupted with a knowing smile on his face.

    "Ahh, see," he said, "I came down here to visit. See this is what happens. I can't end up visiting with you guys and shaking hands if I'm going to get grilled every time I come down here."

    Pressed further by the Politico reporter about his Pentagon nominee, William J. Lynn III, Obama turned more serious, putting his hand on the reporter's shoulder and staring him in the eye.

    "Alright, come on" he said, with obvious irritation in his voice. "We will be having a press conference at which time you can feel free to [ask] questions. Right now, I just wanted to say hello and introduce myself to you guys - that's all I was trying to do."   More at article from Politico at: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17831.html
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "New president, same old snake-oil economics" Gerald Warner

    ["...Obama's so-called stimulus package – is the vehicle for transforming America into a Stetson-wearing European Union."]

    Gerald Warner: New president, same old snake-oil economics
    Published Date: 18 January 2009
     
    TUESDAY may be regarded by future historians as the beginning of the end for the United States of America.
    It is the first credible date that may become iconic as the moment when the federation that came into existence in 1776 and rose to global hegemony in the 20th century joined Macedonia, Rome and Britain in the catacombs of fallen empires. Barack Obama is America's nemesis.

    This presidency has the very real potential to impoverish America on a scale that could demote it irreversibly from its economic superpower status. When a politician masquerades as a messiah, be very afraid. This column was subjected to frantic abuse circa 1997 for denouncing Tony Blair as the Great Charlatan. Today, it is hardly an isolated view.

    Obama is mega-Blair. It is understandable some Americans should be deceived; but after the Blair experience there is no excuse for any Britons buying the Brooklyn Bridge. The one reservation that slightly dampens the euphoria of Obama groupies is the thought that now, with a massive recession under way, is a most inopportune time to come into office. Nothing could be further from the truth. From Obama's viewpoint, this is a preternaturally opportune moment, an unhoped-for conjunction of circumstances that uniquely enables him to implement a programme that would otherwise have been unthinkable.

    In normal times, the aggressive expansion of big government and state intervention into every area of the economy and of citizens' lives would be a non-starter in America. Today, however, a recession that threatens to deepen into a depression has left frightened citizens vulnerable to the blandishments of the Keynesian snake-oil salesman. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan – Obama's so-called stimulus package – is the vehicle for transforming America into a Stetson-wearing European Union.

    Even before the plan, the US federal deficit will be $1.2 trillion this year. Last February, when Congress passed a $152bn stimulus bill, Obama condemned it as "deficit spending" and denounced the "disdain for pay-as-you-go budgeting" it displayed. At the end of 2008, his adviser David Axelrod was canvassing "a package from $675bn to $775bn". By last week it had mushroomed to $825bn. Even the Capitol Hill cat knows it will hit $1 trillion.

    Fiscal conservatives are being placated by emphasising the $310bn of his package devoted to tax cuts. Yet the way they are being directed, even at this early stage, looks wasteful. The better plan, as Republicans pointed out, would have been to cut the middle-income tax rate from 25% to 15%. For that matter, if the government has $825bn to spare, the real stimulus would have been to translate it all into tax cuts that would have galvanised the economy.

    No way, José: that is foreign to the Obama mindset. The stimulus package is exactly like those parcels of toxic debt the banks were passing around. Under the pretence of "stimulus", Obama is implementing interventionist schemes and paying Danegeld to various interest groups. Obama admits 244,000 new government jobs will be created: sceptical critics put the real figure at 600,000. He promises to create 459,000 new jobs in "green energy". That says it all: federal pen-pushers and people manufacturing useless wind turbines – all the leftist, non-productive sinecures that stagnate, rather than stimulate, an economy.

    Overall, Obama promises more than three million new jobs. Unfortunately, some clever clogs in Congress with a ball-point and the back of an envelope spotted that meant a cost of $275,000 per job. Governments cannot create jobs. All they can do is invent camouflaged welfare programmes. Only the market can create jobs; and massive "job" creation in the public sector destroys real employment.

    To implement a programme so alien to the instincts of Americans, Obama needs a supportive mythology. He has found it in the myth of Franklin D Roosevelt's New Deal. That massive interventionist programme actually delayed recovery from the 1930s depression. During 1930-40, the US economy would have been expected to grow 30%-40%. Instead, it languished: net private investment totalled -$3.1bn. So-called infrastructure programmes are unsuitable for combating recession: they need long advance planning and proper execution; too often they are gerry-built white elephants.

    Barack Obama's inauguration address on Tuesday will be big on rhetoric: that is what he does. The plan he will trumpet will be a failure economically; but it may well prove a success in achieving its author's agenda – reducing the US to a Keynesian theme park like the ones based in Brussels, Paris and, most recently, London.  ( More at: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/comment/Gerald-Warner-New-president-same.4887764.jp )
     
    The full article appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper, found at: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/comment/Gerald-Warner-New-president-same.4887764.jp
    Page 1 of 1

    • Last Updated: 17 January 2009 7:45 PM
    • Source: Scotland On Sunday
    • Location: Scotland
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous123Next »