About Me

Name: Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas Obama's Birth Certificate

"...to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii."
 
"If Virtue and Knowledge are diffused among the People, they will never be enslav'd. This will be their great security."
-- Samuel Adams

Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas   Excerpted from: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1948

Yesterday, DecaLogosIntl.org reported that James Broe, one of 13 Plaintiffs in Broe v. Reed, has filed a motion for expedited discovery and authority to issue subpoenas in Washington State Supreme Court:

Names and Designation of Persons Filing Motion

COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii.  Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.

  1. Plaintiffs are to serve the Secretary of State of the State of Washington with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Friday, December 19, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ counsel Stephen Pidgeon no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.
  2. Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

Associated PDF documentation:

-Phil
 

Re-posting articles from this site is encouraged, as long as the contextual integrity of the whole or snippet (including all embedded links) is maintained. Each posting is highly prone to updates at any time.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 16th, 2008 at 8:55 am and is filed under Activism, Broe v. Reed, Eligibility, POTUS, SOS Lawsuits. Follow responses to this entry through my RSS comment feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Responses to “Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas

 
In the interim-I would ask that everyone contact via e-mail or letter, your 2 Senators and 1 Congressman to demand that they object on January 6 to the Electoral Vote certification and abide by their Oath of Office to Defend the Constitution and require Mr. Obama to comply with the requirements of Art.II. as his own statements and actions (he has stated that he was a dual citizen at birth) appear to violate the requirement of being a “natural born citizen” (See: Perkins v. ELG, 307 US 325,330 (1939) in which Justice Hughes provides the basis for the interpretation of this qualification to be President to mean that the father must be a citizen at the time of birth.(Obamas father was Kenyan at the time) Its not about Obama its about the Constitution and the law! All that is needed is one Senator and one Representative to stop Obama from continuing to violate the Constitution.
 
A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1875
1st Congress, 2nd Session  
Page 103 of 755  
|

Page 103 of 755,
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wrotnowski Stay Denied By SCOTUS, Case Essentially Dead

"It's official, Cort Wrotnowski's application for stay has been denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. I have no details as to how many Justices on either side, etc., but none of it comes as a surprise." America's Right.Com

Monday, December 15, 2008

Wrotnowski Stay Denied, Case Essentially Dead

It's official, Cort Wrotnowski's application for stay has been denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. I have no details as to how many Justices on either side, etc., but none of it comes as a surprise.

From CNN's Blog:
The justices without comment on Monday refused to intervene in the November 4 presidential election, dismissing the claims of Cort Wrotnowski, a resident of Greenwich, Connecticut.

In his appeal, Wrotnowski claimed that because Obama's father was a Kenyan-born British subject, the president-elect does meet the Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural born citizen" of the United States. Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. His mother was a U.S. citizen, born in the United States.

Many legal analysts questioned Wrotnowski's argument.

"The law has always been understood to be, if you are born here, you're a natural born citizen," said Thomas Goldstein, founder of the Scotusblog.com Web site and a lawyer who has argued numerous cases before the high court. "And that is particularly true in this case, when you have a U.S. citizen parent like Barack Obama's mother."

As far as I know--and I very much could be wrong--the applications for stay in both the Wrotnowski and Donofrio case essentially asked the Court two questions: First, whether the Court would consider the applications for stay as a petition for writ of certiorari, and second, whether the Court would grant that petition for writ of certiorari and agree to hear the case at hand on its merits. In Bush v. Gore, for example, the same sort of process was taken, with an application for stay filed first and subsequently treated by the Court as a petition for certiorari in order for the case to be heard from there. That's why most Election Law casebooks have two separate opinions -- one for whether the stay should be considered a petition for certiorari, and another for the petition itself.

In the Wrotnowski and  Cort Wrotnowski's application for stay has been denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. cases, those applications for stay--the ones asking the Court to consider them as petitions for writ of certiorari--were denied. Therefore, as far as I know, there is no petition for writ of certiorari to live on in perpetuity in either case. Thus, the Donofrio case, in its current form, is dead in the water. As is the Wrotnowski case.

That leaves Philip Berg's case and Orly Taitz's Lightfoot v. Bowen as the only ones before the Court. Lightfoot, I believe, was denied by Kennedy and may await the same sort of conference which doomed Wrotnowski and Donofrio. While Berg's case and Taitz's case are very different from those filed by Cort Wrotnowski and Leo Donofrio--in fact, I thought the latters' questions were more fitting for the Court--I have no reason to believe that either Berg's or Taitz's petition for writ of certiorari will be anything but denied. Given the disposition on the [admittedly] superficially similar cases over the past two weeks, the already insurmountable odds can be considered even more daunting."
 
Excerpted From America's Right.Com. All Credit to: America's Right.Com at: http://www.americasright.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Update: Cort Wrotnowski v. Bysiewkz (Obama's Eligibility To Be Prez)

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewkz[UPDATE]: 11:26 AM - Dec. 12 2008 :
 
Rumors of a decision denying Cort's application are unequivocally false
. A SCOTUS Spokesperson just told Cort Wrotnowski there has been no decision. She indicated there will be no decision until Monday. The conference is sealed, no clerks are allowed in.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SCOTUS & Wrotnowski:Rumors of a decision denying Cort's application are false.

#08A469 Wrotnowski v. Bysiewkz. Update

From Leo Donofrio's site:

[UPDATE]: 11:26 AM - Dec. 12 2008 : Rumors of a decision denying Cort's application are unequivocally false. A SCOTUS Spokesperson just told Cort Wrotnowski there has been no decision. She indicated there will be no decision until Monday. The conference is sealed, no clerks are allowed in.


Original Posting:
No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg. Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008. Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
No. 08A469
 
Title:
Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:
 
Lower Ct:
Supreme Court of Connecticut
  Case Nos.:
(SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ 
~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008
Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008
Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008
Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008
Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
 
 
Cort Wrotnowski
1057 North Street
(202) 862-8554
 
Greenwich, CT  06831
 
Party name: Cort Wrotnowski
Attorneys for Respondent:
 
 
Richard Blumenthal
Attorney General
(860) 808-5316
 
Office of the Attorney General
 
 
55 Elm Street
 
 
P.O. Box 120
 
 
Hartford, CT  06141-0120
 
Party name: Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State


From A Blog Discussion:
 
Read
Scalia: 'Constitution Not Living Organism'
 
Scalia said he reads the text of the Constitution in a literal manner, a method in which the "plain and ordinary meaning" of the text guides interpretation. "Words mean what they mean."
 
__________________________________________________________________________________
 
“It takes 4 votes to put it on the docket. I wonder which of the conservatives voted against Donofrio?”

Since it is almost certain that Scalia read Cort’s brief before the 5th, is it not possible that the conservatives, when they met on the 5th, discussed the issues and said the brief filed to Scalia was more appropriate to hear?

Maybe this could be seen in a positive light. Even if the electorial college meets before the case is heard....there is no reason to assume that IF the court heard the case and IF they ruled in favor of the plaintiff....Mr. Obama could be forced to vacate the Oval Office. Of course, then we would have Biden for president... 
Comment by Sola Veritas
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
From Leo Donofrio's blog, 12/08/08:

[UPDATE 12:23 PM The main stream media should stop saying SCOTUS refused to hear the case. It was distributed for conference on Nov. 19. They had the issue before them for for sixteen days. Yes, they didn't take it to the next level of full briefs and oral argument. But they certainly heard the case and read the issues. The media is failing to acknowledge that. The case and issues were considered. Getting the case to the full Court for such consideration was my goal. I trust the Supreme Court had good reason to deny the application. Despite many attempts to stop their full review, my case was placed on their desks and into their minds. Please remember that. It's important for history to record that.]

My application was denied. The Honorable Court chose not to state why.

Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday. I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.

After six days, it’s interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.

My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a “motion for leave to appeal” rather than the “direct appeal” that it actually was. On Nov. 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Nov. 22. The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.

On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Cort’s case, I must stress that Cort’s case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does. It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.

I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.

I don’t know if it’s significant that Cort’s case was not denied at the same time as mine. His case argues the same exact theory - that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.

All eyes should now be closely watching http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm , Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

If Cort’s application is also denied then the fat lady can sing. Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case. Cort’s application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Cort’s quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.

I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.

Cort’s case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.

I’m not trying to play with people’s minds here. SCOTUS has not updated Cort’s docket and until they do there can be no closure. I was expecting, if they didn’t grant certiorari, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue. I hate to read tea leaves, but Cort’s application is still pending. That’s all we can really say with any certainty.

PS: please apply "obamatruthfile" to all these threads.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maybe Obama's people first demanded that Blagojevich name Jarrett to the Senate seat, and then he decided to turn the tables?

"Rahm Emanuel may have had discussions with Gov. Blagojevich and the FBI may have the tape according to Chicago news sources. This, despite denials by Emanuel and president-elect Obama. Emanuel has been dodging reporters and has not made any statement about the report. "

Excerpted From Flopping Aces The Time Line:

I have never spoken to the governor on this subject. I am confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact,” Obama said at a Chicago news conference. “I’ve asked my team to gather the facts of any contacts with the governor’s office about this vacancy so that we can share them with you over the next few days.”

Obama, in other words, will ask his staff to compile documents that reveal when they established contact with Blagojevich’s office. But what about the many “advisors” and other individuals who appear to be relaying information between Blagojevich and Obama in the conversations transcribed and summarized in the criminal complaint filed by Special Agent of the FBI David Cain? I ask this question, as it is clear to me that communication between Obama and Blagojevich was occurring between third parties. While they may not embroil his immediate advisors in any scheme that involving “pay to play,” it does reveal that others who served as emissaries for Blagojevich and Obama did embroil themselves and, by implication, Blagojevich and Obama in such conversations.

Obama, according to Advisor B, one of Blagojevich’s advisors cited on page 68 of the complaint, wanted to avoid any “fingerprints” in any arrangement made with Blagojevich. And Blagojevich, according to page 57 of the complaint, sought to “conduct indirectly … a negotiation” with Obama. Nothing could be in writing, and everything must be indirect: this is why Obama’s attempt to appear transparent with a release of all direct communications with Blagojevich’s office is irrelevant. What is relevant are all the indirect communications that occurred. Who are the Advisors mentioned in the complaint? Who spoke with the SEIU representative? Why was Blagojevich on the telephone with “advisors” in Washington, DC? And who on the Obama staff was speaking to these “advisors?”

Let us review the chronology as it is outlined in the criminal complaint.

Conservation 1: November 3, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Deputy Governor A discuss the possibility of an open US Senate seat the day before the Presidential election
  • Blagojevich threatens to assume the seat if he is not offered anything

With whom was Deputy Governor A communicating? And is Deputy Governor A considered a member of Blagojevich’s office?

Conversation 2: November 3, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Advisor A
  • Blagojevich tells Advisor A that he is aware of media reports of Senate Candidate 1’s interest in the open US Senate seat; Blagojevich states he will only offer Valerie Jarrett the Senate seat if he gets “something real good;” he reiterates his intention to assume the seat and to drive a “hard bargain”

With whom was Advisor A communicating?

Conversation 3: November 4, 2008

  • Deputy Governor A broaches the topic of the Senate seat, and he asks Blagojevich to draft of list of wants for the seat
  • Blagojevich notes that nothing can be written down
  • Blagojevich states he is interested in an ambassadorship

With whom was Deputy Governor A speaking? Why is Deputy Governor A asking for a list? To whom would such a list be submitted?

Conversation 4: November 4, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with John Harris, his Chief of Staff
  • Blagojevich mentions the “trick” of conducting negotiations with Obama “indirectly”
  • He hypothetically asks Obama what Obama is willing to offer for the seat, and he again reiterates his intention to assume the seat himself

With whom was John Harris in communication? And what is this “trick” of negotiating “indirectly?” Does this explain the presence of Washington, DC, advisors in later telephone calls?

Conversation 5: November 5, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Deputy Governor A regarding position he can assume if he were to offer the Senate seat to Obama’s chosen candidate
  • Secretary of Health and Human Services and ambassadorships are discussed; also discussed is Secretary of Energy and Blagojevich’s connection to the coal industry

Notice how the conversation with Deputy Governor A has become more specific, and notice how they discuss possibilities within the Obama administration. With whom was Deputy Governor A in contact? Was this information relayed to team Obama through an intermediary?

Conversation 6: November 5, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with John Harris
  • They discuss federal positions that could be traded for the Senate seat, and Blagojevich mentions the private sector and whether Obama could put something “big” together there
  • Harris mentions private foundations, and Blagojevich tells Harris to do “homework” right away on the possibility
  • The Red Cross is mentioned, but Harris states that it would have to be a private foundation under the influence of a President Obama

Blagojevich knows he is the subject of a federal probe, and he speaks in code as a result. What “homework” was assigned to Harris? To whom was Harris relaying this information about federal positions and private foundation positions that could be traded for the Senate seat? And why did Harris mention that any private foundation would have to be under the influence of a President Obama? With whom did Harris do his homework?

Conversation 7: November 5, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Harris and with Deputy Governor A
  • They discuss potential private foundations heavily dependent on federal aid, as this would place it under the influence of Obama

With whom did Harris and Deputy Governor A speak on November 5? How did they determine that a private foundation would be an option for Blagojevich?

Conversation 8: November 5, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks to Advisor A
  • Blagojevich mentions how Obama could remove someone from the Board of a private foundation and appoint Blagojevich
  • Blagojevich voices demands for something for the seat, and he reiterates an intention to appoint himself to the seat

With whom is Advisor A in contact? To whom is Advisor A relaying information about foundations and about Blagojevich’s various threats?

Conversation 9: November 6, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Spokesman
  • Blagojevich instructs Spokesman to leak information to the Chicago Sun-Times about Senate Candidate 2, Attorney General Lisa Madigan, and Blagojevich’s interest in Senate Candidate 2, which the Chicago Sun-Times published
  • Blagojevich instructed Spokesman to leak such information, as he desired to communicate dissatisfaction to the Obama campaign about Valerie Jarrett and what he thought they were offering for her appointment

What prompted Blagojevich to send a threat to the Obama campaign through print media? Who communicated that information to Blagojevich? How did Blagojevich know he had to threaten the Obama team with a Madigan appointment if they were not in contact either directly or indirectly? And why does the Obama campaign deploy Blagojevich’s strategy of communication through the media later? Did the Obama campaign know Blagojevich was hedging his bets with the article in the Chicago Sun-Times? And if they knew, how did they know? Who communicated that information to them?

Conversation 10: November 7, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Advisor A
  • Blagojevich tells Advisor A he will offer the seat to Jarrett if he is appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services

To whom did Advisor A communicate Blagojevich’s offer? With whom is Advisor A in contact? And why was this offer made after the column was printed? Did Blagojevich print the article and then submit the offer in order to pressure the Obama campaign? And if so, who relayed the offer to the Obama campaign?

Conversation 11: November 7, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with Harris and Advisor B, a Washington, DC, consultant
  • Blagojevich indicates that he will offer Jarrett the Senate seat if he is appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services, but Harris notes that any deal cannot appear to be a quid pro quo
  • Blagojevich notes his financial situation, and Harris states that “they” are considering it
  • Blagojevich, Advisor B and Harris then discuss the possibility of a three way deal involving Blagojevich, Obama and “Change to Win,” an organization tied to SEIU (Service Employees International Union)
  • Harris mentions how such a deal would conceal a quid pro quo
  • Advisor B, who is in DC, is pleased with the notion of a three way deal, and he states that Obama should be leveraged with this deal, as it is better than Madigan as Senator and Blagojevich continuing as Governor

Notice that the notion of a Cabinet position has been abandoned. Who indicated that Obama did not want Blagojevich in the Cabinet? How did Harris know that there were concerns about the appearance of quid pro quo, of “pay to play?” And how does Advisor B in DC intend to leverage Obama? With whom is DC Advisor B in contact? Also notice how much more elaborate the negotiations over a Jarrett appointment are becoming. Clearly there is a line of communication, even if it is indirect.

Conversation 12: November 8, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Harris speak
  • Discussed is the potential of a financial benefit for Blagojevich’s wife, who he believes can work in New York or DC with her Series 7 license
  • An interim position at Change to Win for Blagojevich’s wife is also discussed

Notice that Blagojevich is upping the ante here. Who communicated this to the Obama campaign? With whom is Harris in contact?

Conversation 13: November 10, 2008

  • Blagojevich, his wife, Harris, Governor General Counsel and various Washington, DC, advisors, including Advisor B, speak on a conference call
  • Blagojevich mentions his connections in Obama’s teams, and he asks how that can be parlayed into financial and political benefits for him and his wife
  • Blagojevich mentions how he can assume the Senate seat in order to avoid impeachment in Illinois, and he agrees that Obama will not appoint him to a Cabinet position, as he is too controversial
  • Blagojevich asks what he can obtain for the Senate seat, and he mentions that Governor General Counsel believes Blagojevich can be appointed to a private sector Board in exchange for appointing Jarrett to the Senate, but it would have to be a Board not directly connected to Obama
  • Blagojevich’s wife also mentions her desire to be appointed to a Board, and Blagojevich mentions his wife’s experience and Series 7 license
  • Blagojevich mentions that he does not want to be Governor anymore
  • Blagojevich complains that the advisors on the phone are telling him that he must “suck it up” for another two years
  • Blagojevich complains that he will receive nothing in return for appointing Jarrett, and he threatens to appoint Senate Candidate 4, one of the three Deputy Governors of Illinois, in retaliation
  • Blagojevich mentions how his wife is more qualified to sit on corporate boards than a “specifically named individual,” who is most probably Michelle Obama
  • Harris and Blagojevich remind advisors of the problem of Blagojevich’s financial security, and Blagojevich indicates that without something in return he will not appoint Jarrett
  • Harris broaches the three way deal with Obama, Blagojevich and the SEIU involving “Change to Win;” such a deal will occur in two years
  • A Blagojevich advisor admonishes Blagojevich to be “leery” of promises for events to occur to two years from now
  • Blagojevich then discusses other manners whereby he can earn money

During this conference call with Washington, DC, advisors and Blagojevich’s inner circle, it becomes clear that Blagojevich’s attempt to parlay the Jarrett appointment for a position for him and his wife has deteriorated: he learns he is too controversial; he learns that Obama’s team has no intention to give him anything; he learns that they want him to complete the final two years of his term as Governor; and he realizes that any attempt to gain anything by a Jarrett appointment will result in nothing. How did he and the advisors on the telephone learn this? Who communicated the Obama team’s intention not to appoint Blagojevich to corporate boards to the Obama’s Cabinet to the Washington, DC, advisors on the call? But notice the SEIU deal with “Change to Win” is still an option. Obama, it seems, does not want to consider the other options, as he and his team hope to avoid the appearance of quid pro quo. But how was this communicated to the DC advisors on the telephone with Blagojevich? Who were the intermediaries, and how was this knowledge disseminated?

Conversation 14: November 10, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor A discuss the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich asks if Obama could appoint his wife to a Board
  • If Obama cannot or will not appoint Blagojevich’s wife to a corporate Board, then Blagojevich will appoint Jesse Jackson, Jr. to the Senate seat

Here it is clear that Blagojevich and his advisor have learned that the Obama campaign will not appoint Blagojevich to anything. Here they are determining whether or not the wife can be appointed to the position. But notice that although Blagojevich will not receive any direct financial benefit, his wife can. Also notice that the Obama campaign still desires Jarrett to hold the Senate seat. This explains why there are all these conversations and negotiations. It also explains why Blagojevich exploded during Conversation 13: he knows they want the seat for Jarrett, but they are not willing to offer what he wants. Instead, they think they can ask him to wait two years. That is still a promise, however.

Conversation 15: November 10, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor A discuss the open Senate seat again
  • Blagojevich asks Advisor A to leak to the Chicago Sun-Times that he is seriously considering Jesse Jackson, Jr., for the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich considers this to be another threat to the Obama campaign, who still desires Jarrett
  • It is clear that Blagojevich has not intention of selection Jackson; he simply hopes to apply pressure to the Obama campaign

Notice that after negotiations with Obama through various advisors and intermediaries disintegrates, Blagojevich resorts to planting an article in the Chicago Sun-Times in order to compel the Obama team to reconsider their terms. How did Blagojevich and his advisors learn that Obama and his team refused to meet Blagojevich’s terms? Who communicated this? And what did the Obama campaign intend to offer Blagojevich in two years? What was the line of communication between advisors on the call in DC and Obama’s team?

Conversation 16: November 11, 2008

  • Blagojevich and John Harris discuss the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich suggests the creations of a 501(c)(4) he could run that would be funded by Warren Buffett or other wealthy Obama allies
  • Blagojevich also mentions that he could appoint Senate Candidate 4, Illinois Deputy Governor Louanner Peters, who will vacate it if Blagojevich is impeached and in need of a political office
  • Blagojevich knows Obama will not offer him what he wants in exchange for appointing Jarrett

Blagojevich apparently knows Obama will not consider his terms, which explains why he is discussing these other options with his Chief of Staff. But Blagojevich still believes there is room for negotiation. How did Blagojevich know Obama refused to consider his terms? Who communicated this to the advisors who speak with Blagojevich? Who relayed this information between Blagojevich and Obama?

Conversation 17: November 11, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor A discuss the open Senate seat
  • Advisor A mentions how he is attempting to leak the story about Jesse Jackson, Jr., to the Chicago Sun-Times, and Blagojevich asks about the viability of the creation of a 501(c)(4) to be bankrolled by wealthy Obama allies
  • Blagojevich mentions how he could run such an organization, and he mentions how Senate Candidate 6, an Illinois millionaire who may be Blair Hull, can bankroll the organization, but Advisor A explains how it would be difficult for Blagojevich to appoint Senate Candidate 6 to the open seat
  • Blagojevich explains how Senate Candidate 6 is better than receiving nothing for selecting Valerie Jarrett, and he asks Advisor A to locate someone who could broach the possibility of bankrolling a 501(c)(4) with Senate Candidate 6

Blagojevich at this point has learned that the Obama campaign will not consider his terms, as they believe he should wait two years. Again, there was a network of communication between the people surrounding Blagojevich and those surrounding Obama. But notice that Blagojevich is now pursuing alternatives. Apparently someone connected to Obama made it very clear to someone connected to Blagojevich that Obama will only appoint Blagojevich to a Board to the Cabinet after Blagojevich finishes his term. But at this point the Obama campaign still believes they can convince Blagojevich to select Jarrett.

Conversation 18: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with John Harris
  • Blagojevich and Harris learn through CNN that Jarrett has withdrawn her name from consideration for the US Senate seat
  • Harris interprets it as a tactic of the Obama team
  • Blagojevich broaches the topic of a 501(c)(4) again, and he mentions how Obama and allies can fund it while he is still Governor and Jarrett is Senator; Blagojevich also mentions that Senate Candidate 6 can help bankroll the issues advocacy group to be led by Blagojevich
  • They agree this is easier for Obama than for Obama to appoint Blagojevich to a position

Obviously Team Obama learned that Blagojevich was upset and willing to consider other candidates for the open Senate seat. Why else did they leak a story to one of their stenographers at CNN? But how did they learn this? Who communicated Blagojevich’s refusal to wait for two years to Obama and his team? And notice how Blagojevich and Harris view the leaked news report as a tactic: they still believe they can negotiate with Obama, and they still believe a 501(c)(4) can be created. All this is indirect communication at its best.

Conversation 19: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich discusses the open Senate seat with Advisor B
  • Blagojevich discusses the option of a 501(c)(4) with Advisor B, who says the “Change for Win” option is better, for from Obama’s perspective, there would be fewer “fingerprints” of Obama’s involvement
  • Advisor B mentions that “Change for Win” is a better option, as there will not be stories in four years of how Obama bought Blagojevich off
  • Blagojevich mentions how a 501(c)(4) will exist in two years, while “Change to Win” may not

Harris was right: the leaked CNN story was a tactic. Here is Blagojevich on the phone with one of his DC contacts, who mentions an anxiety of “fingerprints” and future news stories. The Obama campaign wants to strike a deal with Blagojevich, but they do not want direct involvement. This is why they think a “Change to Win” position in two years is favorable. But now Blagojevich is negotiating for a 501(c)(4). Negotiations are still occurring, and there is still a line of communication between Obama and Blagojevich.

Conversation 20: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with a different DC advisor about the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich mentions the 501(c)(4), but the advisor in DC reiterates the reason why “Change to Win” is more desirable: it is one step removed from the President-elect

Negotiations are still occurring, and the Obama campaign seems to think the “Change to Win” position in two years is the best option, as Obama wants to be nowhere near Blagojevich. Notice that someone else in DC spoke with Blagojevich about this option in the same day. Who was speaking to whom? How was this information disseminated from Obama to Blagojevich and vice versa?

Conversation 21: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich speaks with an SEIU official, SEIU President Andy Stern, who was in DC, about the open Senate seat
  • SEIU official met with Blagojevich the previous week, and Blagojevich understood Stern was an emissary of Jarrett
  • Blagojevich tells Stern he heard Obama was considering candidates other than Jarrett for the open seat, and Stern states he would discuss this with Jarrett
  • Blagojevich mentions the 501(c)(4) advocacy group option to Stern, and he mentions how that advocacy group could assist Jarrett
  • Stern says he will “put that flag up and see where it goes”

Someone informed Blagojevich that Obama was now considering different candidates. How did he learn his, and who communicated it? What is the line of communication between Obama and Blagojevich? And what is the role of Stern? Was Stern communicating information from Blagojevich to Jarrett, who then spoke with Obama? Jarrett is, after all, Co-Chair of the Obama Transition Team. While the contact is not direct, it was only mediated by one third party. Notice Stern was in DC when this conversation occurred

Conversation 22: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor B discuss the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich tells Advisor B that he asked Stern to broach the topic of a 501(c)(4) with Jarrett, Co-Chair of the Obama Transition Team

Conversation 23: November 12, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Harris discuss the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich mentions how he will decide how he will select a candidate for the Senate seat, and he mentions his legal situation as the most important variable
  • Harris reminds him that his legal situation is the hardest one to satisfy, and Blagojevich claims it can be satisfied if he appoints himself to the seat

It is becoming increasingly clear that Blagojevich’s legal situation is the reason Obama is chary to appoint him to a Board immediately. Here it seems Blagojevich is realizing negotiations with Obama through Jarrett and through other advisors will yield nothing, unless, of course, he is willing to wait two years for a position on “Change to Win.”

Conversation 24: November 13, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Harris discuss the open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich tells Harris he wants to speak directly to “President-elect Advisor” about the 501(c)(4) option and how it could be bankrolled
  • Blagojevich says he wants “President-elect Advisor” to receive word of the 501(c)(4) option on that day, for when “President-elect Advisor” asks about the open fifth Congressional district Seat, it will be in the advisor’s mind
  • Blagojevich may have the power to appoint a Representative to Illinois’s fifth Congressional district seat, which was previously occupied by Rahm Emanuel

Here Blagojevich is going for broke, and he believes the 501(c)(4) option in exchange for Jarrett can occur if he broaches the topic of the open fifth Congressional district seat. But Blagojevich wants it mention in a manner in which it is not connected to the Senate seat. I guess this is more indirect communication and negotiation. He wants to speak to the advisor directly, and he wants to speak to the advisor now. Who is this advisor? Some assume it is Rahm Emanuel, as Rahm Emanuel occupied the fifth Congressional Seat before becoming a member of the Obama Transition Team.

Conversation 25: November 13, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor A discuss open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich mentions how he hopes the 501(c)(4) is in the head of the “President-elect Advisor,” but he hopes it is implanted in that person’s mind in a manner in which it is not connected to the open Senate seat or the open House seat
  • When asked by Advisor A if it is, Blagojevich responds, “it’s unsaid. It’s unsaid.”

Blagojevich seems to think that if “President-elect Advisor” hears of the 501(c)(4) proposal, he or she may consider it. Again, Blagojevich is going for broke, and he thinks someone in the inner sanctum of Obama can be swayed. But notice that he does not want it mentioned in relation to the open Senate and House seats. This is indirect communication, although all the involved parties will know, as this has been relayed through intermediaries.

Conversation 26: November 13, 2008

  • Blagojevich and Advisor A discuss open Senate seat
  • Blagojevich asks Advisor A to contact Individual A and ask Individual A to contact “President-elect Advisor” about the 501(c)(4)
  • Advisor A asks if it should be mentioned outside of the open Senate and House seats, and Blagojevich says yes
  • Advisor A asks if Blagojevich wants Individual A to contact “President-elect Advisor” as Blagojevich thinks there is still “life” in Valerie Jarrett
  • Blagojevich thinks there is still life in Jarrett, but he also thinks there are other options

Here it is clear that contacting “President-elect Advisor” with the 501(c)(4) option is the final gambit. And notice that they are in contact with people who can reach advisors of Obama. But Blagojevich wanted to ensure a specific advisor knew of the 501(c)(4) option. Apparently that advisor has a vested interest in the fifth Congressional district seat.

——————————————————

The twenty-six conversations summarized in the criminal complaint reveal that Blagojevich, Obama and their surrogates were communicating and negotiating through an elaborate network of advisors, friends and allies. Notice how the recorded conversations reveal that new terms and offers were submitted by each party as time passed, and notice how a line of communication was established between Blagojevich, Stern and Jarrett, who is Co-Chair of the Obama Transition Team. Also interesting is how both parties responded to each others’ attempts to parlay their terms through media contacts. Communication occurred, and at one point it was almost direct. Blagojevich, we notice, instructed Stern to discuss the 501(c)(4) option with Jarrett, Co-Chair of the Obama Transition Team who is also Senate Candidate #1.
 
In the information concerning the wiretaps in the complaint, it’s clear that Blago was VERY anxious to speak to either Jarrett or the Pres.-Elect Advisor( Emmanuel) in the days between Nov. 10-13 about the creation of a 501(c)(4) with money from Buffet or other rich Obama associates which Blago could run, but there is not information in the complaint that Blago actually did communicate with Jarrett or the Pres.-Elect Advisor.

BUT, the wiretaps continued past Nov. 13, but information about wiretaps after Nov. 13 are not included in the complaint. Did Blago communicate, either directly or through an intermediate with Jarrett and/or Emmanuel after Nov. 13?

Obama said yesterday he is going to find out exactly what communications staff members had with Blago and report the information publicly in a week. They’re going to have to tell everything or tell nothing because they don’t know what might be on those wiretaps after Nov. 13.
 

Abraham H. Miller of Pajamas Media is doing his job.

Chicago blogs are chirping away about Tony Rezko’s meetings with the federal prosecutor. Tony is singing like a songbird. You’d think that the electronic media would be more interested in what Tony might be saying than in how much it cost Sarah Palin to fly her children to state events, something every other Alaskan governor seems to have done.

Tony, you will remember, was Barack Obama’s financial mentor, the guy who subsidized the purchase of Obama’s Hyde Park mansion, and the guy who created the “pay for play” hospital construction scheme that was the end result of legislation Obama sponsored in the Illinois legislature.

Tony was overdrawn $450,000 at a Chicago bank with alleged ties to organized crime. You’d think CNN might send Anderson Cooper to Chicago to investigate why the bank doesn’t have the same kind of check verification technology you encounter at your local supermarket.

And here is another hint for Anderson’s story: What Illinois senator, currently seeking higher office, kept his senatorial campaign funds there and why? Rest assured, it wasn’t because he enjoyed the rush-hour commute across town from his Hyde Park mansion to make deposits.

Chicago blogs are chirping away...Where is the rest of the media? Even Chicago newspapers are getting amnesia over Rezko. Two weeks ago the Chicago Tribune, the paper that broke the still-unexplained real estate deal between convicted felon Tony Rezko and Obama, did not even mention Obama’s jailbird buddy as it endorsed The One for president.

The bank Miller mentioned is Broadway Bank, owned by the family of Illinois State Treausurer Alexi Giannoulias, whom Obama endorsed over the party slated candidate two years ago. Let me make this clear—there is no way “The Boy Banker” would’ve won the primary had it not been for Obama’s endorsement. No way. Obama also appeared in a television commercial touting Alexi. After Alexi’s win, it was revealed that he approved two multi-million dollar loans to mobster Michael “Jaws” Giorango.

 
Rahm Emanuel may have had discussions with Gov. Blagojevich and the FBI may have the tape according to Chicago news sources. This, despite denials by Emanuel and president-elect Obama. Emanuel has been dodging reporters and has not made any statement about the report as of this post
 
Justice Department  Transcript   at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2008/pr1209_01.pdf

Federal Sources: Fitzgerald Held Off Blagojevich Bust to Protect Obama Election Chances; Did Obama Fail Ethics Requirements of Illinois Bar?

12/11/2008

A federal source of mine with ties to Chicago says that FBI agents had enough to prosecute corrupt, helmet-haired Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich back in June, when he was already engaged in some of the blackmail and extortion alleged by the FBI affidavit and other documents associated with his arrest and prosecution. 

The source says that the FBI was suddenly ordered by the U.S. Attorney’s Office–and I believe that order came from the top, ie., U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and Justice Department officials in Washington–to hold off on doing anything until after the election, so as not to hurt Obama’s White House bid.   
 

A federal source of mine with ties to Chicago says that FBI agents had enough to prosecute corrupt, helmet-haired Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich back in June, when he was already engaged in some of the blackmail and extortion alleged by the FBI affidavit and other documents associated with his arrest and prosecution.

The source says that the FBI was suddenly ordered by the U.S. Attorney’s Office–and I believe that order came from the top, ie., U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and Justice Department officials in Washington–to hold off on doing anything until after the election, so as not to hurt Obama’s White House bid. Here’s what my inside source says.

I know for a fact FBI Chicago had enough to indict Blagojevich in June. They were 2 weeks from indictment in June based on cooperation and testimony at the Stu Levine trial. Levine was Tony Rezko’s bud, fund raiser for Blago, and our President-Elect.

I wonder what took them so long? My guess is when it started to look like a lock for Obama’s nomination by the Dems, someone at the U.S. Attorney’s Office put it all on hold, so as not to spoil “The Annointed One’s” shot.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Iranian Born Advisor Jarrett, Blagojevich's "Pay to Play" Replacement?

"... source close to Obama said Jarrett is also Obama's choice to be named to take over his seat in the Senate, though Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich would have the final say over a replacement."
 
Connecting The Dots...

Obama visits his new home...

President-elect Barack Obama is looking forward to Monday's White House transition talks with President Bush and is already examining ways to make a quick impact upon taking office, top Obama aides said Sunday.

"I think it was very gracious of President Bush to invite him so early -- usually it happens a little later in the process," Valerie Jarrett, one of the transition team's co-chairs, told reporters.

"I think because of the daunting challenges that are facing our country, President Bush thought it was important to move forward quickly."

A prominent Democratic source close to Obama said Jarrett is also Obama's choice to be named to take over his seat in the Senate, though Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich would have the final say over a replacement.
 
posted by KatieG  Excerpted from: http://pseudojournalist.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html
 

The Blagojevich Private Conference Call, Valerie Jarrett and The Obama Transition Team

Posted by: Flap in Barack Obama, Rod Blagojevich, Valerie Jarrett
Valerie-Jarrett-and-Obamawe

Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett

Fox News is reporting this story as breaking news but the Wall Street Journal had this piece last night: Blagojevich’s Big Conference Call and Valerie Jarrett’s Clean Break

Among the hundreds of hours of conversations involving Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich secretly recorded by the FBI since Oct. 22, one phone call is drawing particular scrutiny among politicos, journalists and others in Washington. It was a marathon conference call on Monday, Nov. 10.The call lasted about two hours.On the phone were Mr. Blagojevich, his wife, his general counsel, an unnamed adviser, and John Harris, the governor’s chief of staff and his co-defendant in this week’s case.But what’s drawing the most interest is who was on the line from Washington, and the sequence of political events that followed that same night and in the ensuing days regarding Barack Obama’s close friend and adviser, Valerie Jarrett.

According to the FBI, there were “various Washington, D.C., based advisers” on the call with Mr. Blagojevich & Co., although the Washington callers are not named. The FBI also said participants popped on and off the line throughout the conversation.

Ok, so who from the Obama Transition Team was on THAT call? Did they report to Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s Chief of Staff?

In other words, who in the Obama operation knew what was transpiring with “pay to play” and warned off Obama’s friend, Valerie Jarrett?

Obama needs to come clean about this and NOW.

Who will “The One” throw under the bus?

Stay tuned…….  Posted by Flap 12/11/08  Excerpted from: http://flapsblog.com/category/valerie-jarrett/
 
Posted By: gretnajo @ 10/08/2008 3:50:56 PM    Excerpted from:  http://www.newsweek.com/id/162297/output/comments
I wish she would talk more about Iranian born Valerie Jarrett who is the brains behind Obama and their ties to Iraqi Nadhmi Auchi and Syrian Tony Rezko who by the way was funded in all his property and business deals by GE capital. You know the parties in 2004 , Obama's new house sounds more then a little interesting almost like a terrorist conspiracy.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
More Dots

But this also sets up a new story that comes from the criminal complaint filed by the FBI against Rod Blagojevich. Section 101 of the complaint states:

b. ROD BLAGOJEVICH asked what he can get from the President-elect for the Senate seat. ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that Governor General Counsel believes the President-elect can get ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the President-elect’s pick to the Senate. Governor General Counsel asked, “can [the President-elect] help in the private sector. . . where it wouldn’t be tied to him? . . . I mean, so it wouldn’t necessarily look like one for the other.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s wife suggested during the call that she is qualified to sit on corporate boards and has a background in real estate and appraisals. ROD BLAGOJEVICH asked whether there is something that could be done with his wife’s “series 7″ license in terms of working out a deal for the Senate seat. ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he is “struggling” financially and does “not want to be Governor for the next two years.”

 c. ROD BLAGOJEVICH said that the consultants (Advisor B and another consultant are believed to be on the call at that time) are telling him that he has to “suck it up” for two years and do nothing and give this “motherf*cker [the President-elect] his senator. F*ck him. For nothing? F*ck him.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH states that he will put “[Senate Candidate 4]” in the Senate “before I just give f*cking [Senate Candidate 1] a f*cking Senate seat and I don’t get anything.” (Senate Candidate 4 is a Deputy Governor of the State of Illinois). ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he needs to find a way to take the “financial stress” off of his family and that his wife is as qualified or more qualified than another specifically named individual to sit on corporate boards. According to ROD BLAGOJEVICH, “the immediate challenge [is] how do we take some of the financial pressure off of our family.” Later in the phone call, ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that absent getting something back, ROD BLAGOJEVICH will not pick Senate Candidate 1. HARRIS re-stated ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s thoughts that they should ask the President-elect for something for ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s financial security as well as maintain his political viability. HARRIS said they could work out a three-way deal with SEIU and the President-elect where SEIU could help the President-elect with ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s appointment of Senate Candidate 1 to the vacant Senate seat, ROD BLAGOJEVICH would obtain a position as the National Director of the Change to Win campaign, and SEIU would get something favorable from the President-elect in the future.

Well, who are these people?

Senate Candidate #1 is Valerie Jarrett, an Obama advisor who also served as Daley’s Chief of Staff. Jarrett is very close to the Obamas.

Senate Candidate #4 is either Dean Martinez, Bob Greenlee or Louanner Peters, all of whom are Deputy Governors of Illinois.

Who is the “specifically named individual?” That answer comes from Truthteller at No Quarter Blog.

It is Michelle Obama, the soon-to-be First Lady of the United States of America.

No Quarter notes that Michelle “was appointed to to the Board of TreeHouse Foods, a WAL-MART vendor, on June 25, 2005, even though she did not have experience in the private sector previous to the appointment.” A link to that news story is here:

Michelle Obama’s Ties To Wal-Mart Cut
Lynn Sweet
Chicago Sun-Times
May 23, 2007

Those ties were cut in 1987 due to Wal-Mart’s ongoing conflict with organized labor and the Obama campaign didn’t want the conflict of interest. But even so, Michelle got quite a bit of cash out of the deal. According to the above article, compensation was “$51,200 from TreeHouse in 2006. She leaves the board with an option to buy 2,266 TreeHouse shares at a strike price of $29.65. Shares closed at $28.10 Tuesday.”

So, why is this relevent? No Quarter quotes Section 87 of the criminal complaint:

87. By law, after the President-elect’s resignation of his position as a U.S. Senator, which was effective on November 16, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH has sole authority to appoint his replacement for the two years remaining of the President-elect’s Senate term. See 10 ILCS 5/25-8. During the course of this investigation, agents have intercepted a series of communications regarding the efforts of ROD BLAGOJEVICH, JOHN HARRIS, and others to misuse this power to obtain personal gain, including financial gain, for ROD BLAGOJEVICH and his family. In particular, ROD BLAGOJEVICH has been intercepted conspiring to trade the senate seat for particular positions that the President-elect has the power to appoint (e.g. the Secretary of Health and Human Services). ROD BLAGOJEVICH has also been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for his wife’s placement on paid corporate boards or ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s placement at a private foundation in a significant position with a substantial salary. ROD BLAGOJEVICH has also been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for millions of dollars in funding for a non-profit organization that he would start and that would employ him at a substantial salary after he left the governorship.

No Quarter goes on to say:

Blagojevich, in other words, assumed Obama would appoint his wife to a Board for the political favor of selecting Valerie Jarrett for the Senate seat. Blagojevich is not a stupid man. Indeed, he only assumed Obama would participate in this “pay to play” scheme, for he knows Obama is acutely aware how the game is played in Illinois and in Chicago. This explains why Blagojevich mentions Michelle Obama and her lack of qualifications to serve on the Board of TreeHouse Foods when he discusses how Obama could appoint Mrs. Blagojevich to a Board for the political favor of appointing Jarrett to the US Senate seat. Michelle, after all, was appointed to sit on the Board of TreeHouse foods AFTER Obama was elected to the US Senate. Moreover, Michelle Obama’s salary at The University of Chicago nearly TRIPLED after her husband gained the power to submit earmark requests on her employer’s behalf. Just appoint the spouse to a Board and increase his or her salary if you need a political favor from an Illinois politician. That is how the “play to pay” game is played.

Now, this in no way says that Michelle Obama is involved in the Blagojevich scandal. But it does show how scandals like this can bring certain facts and information to light that the people involved do not necessarily want brought out. Michelle Obama’s high-paid employment at jobs for which she had no experience is a prime example of such information.

I am sure that Barack Obama would have preferred that this remain covered and hence his desire to remain “mute,” because now it puts his wife and her business affairs into a spotlight that cannot be turned off. If something comes up from Michelle’s past to haunt them, it is not something that either one of them can claim they had no knowledge of.

You can access the two articles on-line here:

John Fund: Obama Was Mute On Illinois Corruption
John Fund
The Wall Street Journal
December 11, 2008

Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual” On Page 64 Of The Affidavit Submitted By FBI
No Quarter Blog
December 9, 2008
 
Excerpted From Lengthy Article posted at 84 Rules at: http://84rules.wordpress.com/:
Valerie Jarret  You Tube Videos
 
Obama's "Other Half"
04:27
24,259 views
 
Valerie Jarrett's Thoughts on Barack Obama
05:41
50,708 views
 
 
Obama Spokesperson Says 'Obama Ready to Rule on Day 1'
00:46
1,236 views
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

See Proof Obama Lied! From The Policy Project/Patrick Gibson

 
 

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Proof Obama Lied! Will Blag to talk to Feds? Excerpted from Patrick Gibson's Blog/Column at: http://thepolicyproject.blogspot.com/

All Credit to Patrick Gibson

We all know that Obama had no contact with Governor Blagojevich since long before his election. In fact he even said," I had no contact with the governor or his office." We all also know that Obammunist and Chief Politburo member David Axelrod has been very clear that he misspoke . This is from Governor Blag's website:



Well... we all know that Blag is a liar and a crook... so let's look elsewhere...

The next item I thought you all might want to see is from the now-infamous KHQA article that reportedly was pulled:



Is it possible that our newly elected agent of change is being less than truthful? The fact is that we all know what a swamp Chicago politics are. Something like three governors since 1950 have served time. Blago will be the fourth when all of this is said and done. The questions now are will he roll and talk to Feds? Who starts prosecutor Fitzgerald's car in the mornings? And are we ready for Axelrod, Emmanuel, Obama, et al, to bring their Chicago style thuggery with them to Washington?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"FBI mole "logged frequent visits to Rezko" by Obama (renamed)"

“[In 2004 and 2005,] Sources said Thomas also logged frequent visits to Rezko from Gov. Blagojevich and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Blagojevich and Obama were among the many politicians for whom Rezko raised campaign cash…. Sources said the government had him wear a hidden wire to record conversations with a Chicago alderman–but that he did not record Blagojevich or Obama.”

RezkoTrialWatch: FBI mole "logged frequent visits to Rezko" by Obama (renamed)

In an exclusive interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, FBI “mole” John Thomas, “who’s expected to be a key prosecution witness against indicted developer and political fund-raiser” Antoin “Tony” Rezko, is talking. Thomas told the Sun-Times that “his life became frantic as he amassed hundreds of hours of recorded conversations for federal investigators while trying to maintain the real estate business he built on pluck and hustle.” [snip]

“[In 2004 and 2005,] Sources said Thomas also logged frequent visits to Rezko from Gov. Blagojevich and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Blagojevich and Obama were among the many politicians for whom Rezko raised campaign cash…. Sources said the government had him wear a hidden wire to record conversations with a Chicago alderman–but that he did not record Blagojevich or Obama.”

Read the rest of the article here.

My life as an FBI mole
Chicago Sun Times | 2/10/08 | DAVID ROEDER

FBI PROBE | Real estate broker convicted of fraud becomes a mole for feds to nail Rezko

February 10, 2008
BY DAVID ROEDER Staff Reporter/droeder@suntimes.com

For the first time, the FBI "mole" who's expected to be a key prosecution witness against indicted developer and political fund-raiser Tony Rezko is talking.

In an exclusive interview with the Sun-Times, John Thomas said his life became frantic as he amassed hundreds of hours of recorded conversations for federal investigators while trying to maintain the real estate business he built on pluck and hustle.

A fly on the wall

"Now," Thomas said, "all I want is a little bit of peace."

Thomas wouldn't discuss details of his work for the FBI.

But sources said that, for more than two years when he was giving information to agents, Thomas provided a fly-on-the-wall look inside Rezko's real estate operations and his desperate attempts to keep his projects afloat.

Sources said Thomas also logged frequent visits to Rezko from Gov. Blagojevich and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Blagojevich and Obama were among the many politicians for whom Rezko raised campaign cash. Neither has been charged with any wrongdoing.

Thomas had good reason to help. He hopes to get probation for his own felony fraud conviction in a New York case. And he said he wants to redeem himself in the eyes of business associates and his family.

Sources said Thomas helped investigators build a record of repeat visits to the old offices of Rezko and former business partner Daniel Mahru's Rezmar Corp., at 853 N. Elston, by Blagojevich and Obama during 2004 and 2005.

In one case, sources said, Thomas told authorities he saw a Rezmar employee pass an envelope with a visible wad of bills to an unidentified Blagojevich aide.

Both politicians relied on Rezko for fund-raising connections. Obama was in the thick of his successful run for the U.S. Senate in 2004. Now in the glare of a presidential campaign, Obama has donated to charity $157,835 from contributions to his Senate campaign that he has linked to Rezko.

In a corruption case set for trial next month, Rezko is accused of seeking campaign contributions for Blagojevich and kickbacks from companies seeking state pension business.

At 45, Thomas is a curious figure at the heart of a scandal that has reached into presidential politics.

He is prominent in commercial real estate circles in Chicago, even after pleading guilty in 2004 to felony fraud in New York.

Sources said the government had him wear a hidden wire to record conversations with a Chicago alderman -- but that he did not record Blagojevich or Obama.

Thomas said his work on the Rezko case is "essentially done."

He spoke of having turned government informer to reduce the penalties for his crimes and help rebuild his life and career.

"I was always a very talented real estate person," Thomas said. "But, when I became part of a difficult situation, I made the wrong decisions."

According to an FBI affidavit, those "wrong decisions" included Thomas' drawing more than $350,000 from his customers' credit cards while he was running a billboard leasing business in Manhattan in the late 1990s. He also charged more than $140,000 to an American Express business account he obtained using his father's Social Security number.

Afterward, Thomas, born Bernard Barton Jr., legally changed his name.

Goal was to cut prison term

Discussing what happened in New York, Thomas said he was trying to meet his payroll at a time the company had grown too fast.

According to sources, that was where Thomas first made contact with the FBI and the Justice Department in a move to reduce the likely 15- to 21-month prison term he'd get for fraud.

At the time, in the late 1990s, organized-crime families in New York were trying to muscle into the billboard business. Sources said Thomas helped federal prosecutors.

Relocating to Chicago in 2000, he built a real estate brokerage business. He did it with aggressive cold-calling, managing to connect sellers with buyers and positioning himself as an investor in several downtown deals. Also as part of his business, he secured financing for a commission.

Thomas is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 19 on the New York charges. But his sentencing is likely to be delayed, perhaps for a year, while the Justice Department has him testify in the second of two trials Rezko faces -- that one involving allegations of business fraud. Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn McNiven, a prosecutor on both the Thomas and Rezko cases, declined to comment.

Thomas' real estate activities have given him many contacts in a business that runs on them. But some of his more ambitious development deals have failed amid a flurry of lawsuits. In one case, Thomas is suing a former partner, accusing him of stealing money from renovations for an office building they owned at 318 W. Adams, in the shadow of Sears Tower. A planned conversion to office condominiums at his building has been scrapped.

And Thomas is trading lawsuits with partners in a failed purchase of the 105 W. Adams building. A venture he formed with Mahru to buy a Miami building ended in bankruptcy.

'I'm always working'

Still, Thomas said his business prospects are strong now that he has a startup company -- Red Rock Capital Realty -- that specializes in real estate consulting.

People he has done business with said he doesn't hide his background. Some joke that Thomas even introduces himself as a convicted felon.

"All these brokers, they come in at 10 and leave at 5," Thomas said. "I come in at 7 and leave at 7 at night. I'm always working."

Chicago, he said, "is a wonderful place to do this kind of business. It is the most forgiving."

Thomas said he has repaid his father and hopes to make amends for the sake of his wife and their young child.

He wants, he said, to change. That includes gastric-bypass surgery he had 1½ years ago. Since then, he has lost more than 130 pounds from a frame that once tipped the scales at 365.

On the back of his business card, Thomas expresses his thoughts on his situation.

In eight languages, the card reads: "When life hands you lemons, make lemonade."

Some key dates and events in the life of FBI mole John Thomas:

Late 1990s — Ran a Manhattan company that leased billboard space. Stole several hundred thousand dollars from clients’ credit cards. Helps federal authorities in probe of mob influence in billboards.

2000 — Changes name from Bernard Barton Jr. and relocates to Chicago, where he starts a brokerage, Carnegie Realty Partners LLC, and a billboard company.

2003 — Signs on to represent developer Jeffrey Grossman in a condominium deal at 60 W. Erie. Within days, Grossman is arrested for bank fraud, and Thomas agrees to help the feds. Grossman and Donald Grauer later plead guilty.

2004 — Thomas pleads guilty in New York fraud, gets the case transferred to Chicago. Yet to be sentenced, Thomas begins cooperating with feds’ probe of developer and political fund-raiser Tony Rezko, with a focus on Rezko’s financing deals on 62 acres at Roosevelt and Clark and vacant land at the southwest corner of Chicago and Hudson.

2005 — Still cooperating with prosecutors, Thomas builds business portfolio and attempts several downtown development deals.

2007 — He’s publicly identified as a government mole in the Rezko case
therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/rezkotrialwatch-fbi-mole-logged-frequent-visits-to-rezko-by-obama-renamed/
Sweet blog special: Clinton, Obama and controversial fund-raiser with ties to Rezko. Giving back controversial money. Clinton, Obama, fund-raisers in Chicago Monday
  June 25, 2007 (Excerpted)

CHICAGO-- Here are three stories about a Chicago Democratic fund-raiser, Myron Cherry, his ties to the controversial Tony Rezko, under indictment for public corruption and his connections to White House hopefuls Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.)

June 25, 2007

BY CHRIS FUSCO, DAVE MCKINNEY AND LYNN SWEET Staff Reporters
A lawyer referenced in a public-corruption indictment of Wilmette businessman Tony Rezko is among the hosts of a Chicago fund-raising dinner tonight for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign.

Clinton (D-N.Y.) has no direct connection to Rezko. But one of 20 "chairs" for her Palmer House Hilton event is Myron Cherry, who is among a large circle of people to be enmeshed in two federal indictments Rezko is fighting. Most of those people, including Cherry, have not been charged with any crimes.

Rezko figures more centrally to Clinton's chief rival, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Rezko has donated money directly to Obama's state and U.S. Senate campaigns, hosted fund-raisers for Obama and once owned a parcel of land next to Obama's house.

In a rare confluence, the Obama campaign tonight will be raising money just blocks away from Clinton's during an event at Fulton's on the River restaurant.

Philip Singer, a Clinton spokesman, declined to comment about the ethics of Cherry helping host an event for the New York senator. Cherry himself said he has done nothing wrong and that his role "if any" in Rezko's prosecution "might be as a potential witness."

Cherry is a longtime Democratic contributor and "bundler" who has been valuable to campaigns because he can land donations from a large network of acquaintances. In March 2000, Cherry hosted President Bill Clinton at his Lincolnwood home for a fund-raiser that raised more than $700,000 for the Democratic National Committee.

In October, Cherry surfaced as "Individual H" in a Rezko fraud indictment that involves pension investments made by the Teachers' Retirement System of Illinois. He allegedly was slated to be the recipient of a fee on one proposed investment deal even though he did no work.

Unlike other people identified as "individuals" in the Rezko cases, Cherry has spoken publicly about the matter. He has said his name was inserted in the deal without his knowledge, and that he is cooperating with authorities.

"My efforts in support of numerous Democratic candidates are quite more than a few over the years," Cherry wrote in response to a Chicago Sun-Times inquiry. "I support Senator Clinton and will support her if she is the nominee for the Democratic Party, and if the nominee is a Democratic candidate other than Senator Clinton, I will support that candidate as well."


Cherry's emergence as a host of the Clinton event comes as Obama has given to charity more than $37,000 from Rezko and five people referenced in Rezko's indictments. Obama, however, has kept $2,850 from two other donors involved in the Rezko cases, though those donations are under review, Obama press secretary Bill Burton saidObama, however, has kept $2,850 from two other donors involved in the Rezko cases, though those donations are under review, Obama press secretary Bill Burton said... (more) Excerpted from: Lynn Sweets Columns at: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/06/sweet_blog_special_clinton_oba.html
 
 
 Another Article Of Interest
Writing in Human Events, March 3, 2008, John Batchelor reports on an Alsammarae-Obama-Rezko connection:

"...in April 2005, one month before Mr. Alsammarae left his post, his Ministry of Electricity signed a contract for $50 million with Companion Security to provide training to Iraqis to guard electrical plants by flying them to Illinois for classes.

"Companion Security was headed by a former Chicago policeman with a troubled history, Daniel T. Frawley, in partnership with Mr. Rezko and in association with Daniel Mahru, the lawyer for the original contract and Mr. Rezko's former business partner. In April 2006, Mr. Frawley entered negotiations with Governor Rod Blagojevich's staff to lease a military facility in Illinois to be a training camp. In August 2006, Mr. Frawley started negotiations with Mr. Obama's U.S. Senate staff to complete the contract....

"The timeline of Companion discussions in 2006 is important to note: April 2006 Frawley speaks to governor's office; August 2006 Frawley speaks to senator's office; October 2006 indictment of Rezko revealed; October 2006 Rezko arrested upon return from Syria; October 2006 Alsammarae convicted in Baghdad and makes his first escape attempt; December 2006 Alsammarae escapes from Baghdad. ...

"(In 2004) Mr. Auchi traveled by private aircraft to Midway Airport in Chicago and then to a fete at the Four Season Hotel, where he met with his business partner in Chicago real estate, Mr. Rezko, as well as with Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. Also present that night, according to a fresh report by James Bone and Dominic Kennedy of the London Times, was State Senator Barack Obama, who had recently won the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate seat...."

Most politicians try to keep their financial backers out of trouble until after the election. But Rezko, is already indicted by a federal grand jury. And now his trial has begun in a Chicago federal court.

Rezko, along with Ali Ata and Abdelhamid Chaib, face federal grand jury charges presented in October 2006 by U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald. The case revolves around allegations of fraud between 2000 and 2004 in the sale of 17 Papa Johns' Pizza parlors in Detroit, Chicago and Milwaukee. The case may begin with pizza but it could easily lead back to Europe, Syria, Iraq, and the UN Oil for Food program.

Fitzgerald is the prosecutor who won perjury convictions against Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby, in March, 2007. Chaib is an officer of several of Rezko's restaurant chains including Chicagoland Panda Express franchises. Ata was appointed Executive Director of the Illinois Finance Authority by Governor Blagojevich. Ata was also a former president of the Chicago Chapter of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, and had a financial interest in Rezko's restaurants. Ata reportedly donated as much as $60,000 to Blagojevich and $5,000 to Obama. Rezko reportedly raised as much as $500,000 for Blagojevich and at least $70,000 for Obama's various campaigns. Obama has redirected as much as $150,000 in donations "bundled" by Rezko.

Rezko has other unsavory financial ties. Arab American Media Services reports:

"In 1997, Panda Express won the right to open a lucrative concession at O'Hare International Airport under the city's Minority Set-Aside program which directs large contracts to companies owned by Women, African Americans or Hispanics. The city awarded a 10-year contract for O'Hare Airport to Crucial Inc. in 1999, which the city believed was owned by an African American, Jabir Herbert Muhammad, the son of the late Elijah Mohammad."

Elijah Mohammad led the Nation of Islam until his death in 1975. Jabir Herbert Muhammad was sued in 1999 by boxer Muhammad Ali for unauthorized use of his name in connection with the so-called Muhammad Ali Foundation. Rezko served as Executive Director of the Foundation.
 
 
 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Blagojevich-Obama link (Rezko) and the Black Muslims" Steve Sailer

"Rezko became a virtual one-man headhunting firm for staffing the Blagojevich administration, sending along recommended candidates, many of whom ended up getting appointments. … (The U.S. attorney here has charged that Rezko schemed to pack the government with his cronies so that they could peddle their influence.)"

 

Diversity sensitivity also provides a convenient justification for corruption. Blagojevich said he sought Rezko's

"advice on recommendations for agency directors for two reasons. Number one, I had every reason to think he was honest and independently successful in business and that he was able to bring us people who were not part of state government before. And he has connections and roots in the African American community, and he could help us with candidates . . . because part of what we wanted to do was to have a diverse administration."

The Blagojevich-Obama link and the Black Muslims  by Steve Sailer

"Jabir and Tony (Rezko) also got a $10 million affirmative action contract from SBC, ..."

Everybody knows by now that one big link between the President-Elect and the now-arrested Governor of Illinois is Tony Rezko. What a lot of people still don't know about is that Rezko, who is a white Christian immigrant from Aleppo, Syria, has been intimately tied to the Black Muslims for a quarter of a century. Here's part of my VDARE.com column from 9/1/08, "Obama's Kind of Town, Chicago Is:"

Strikingly, the Nation of Islam in particular and Chicago black politics in general were Rezko's launching pad for his decades-long takeover of quite a bit of the government of the State of Illinois.

James L. Merriner wrote in Chicago magazine in November 2007:

"When Harold Washington was running for mayor of Chicago in 1983, Rezko held a fundraiser after Jabir Herbert Muhammad, who was Muhammad Ali's business manager, urged him to get involved in the campaign. Subsequently, Rezko also joined Ali's entourage, traveling the world with him for five years. Rezko apparently took little interest in boxing—he says he and Ali did watch a few matches together—but he relished putting together business and endorsement deals for the champ."[Mr. Inside Out]

 

I bet he did. A rich punchdrunk pugilist and Tony Rezko—what could possibly go wrong? In the 1990s, Ali's latest wife forced out both Jabir and Tony.

Strange as it seems, the relationship between Rezko and the Black Muslims is not unique. Chicago-based columnist Ray Hanania of the Arab Writers Group explained:

"Like many Arab Americans, Rezko had close ties to the Nation of Islam, which sympathized with the Palestinian and Arab causes. He became close to the inspiring icons like Muhammad Ali and even young Obama, a little-known state legislator who later rose to stardom."

 

Rezko is representative of a recent trend in Chicago politics: the rise of Arab wheeler-dealers as corruption catalysts.

The elites of the African-American and Arab communities may tend to agree on foreign policy. But down on the street, relations are hostile. The Arab immigrants, who are best known in Chicago as middle-man merchants operating liquor stores and the like in the ghetto, much like the Koreans in South Central Los Angeles at the time of the 1992 riots, are too hated by black voters to win political power for themselves through the ballot box. Hence their leaders tend to play shadowy roles in Chicago politics.

Rezko kept a sharp eye out for upcoming black political talent who could provide a politically correct front for him. Rezmar offered Obama a job in 1990. He didn't take it, but that was the beginning of a long and mutually beneficial friendship between Rezko and the man who is now the Democratic Presidential nominee. Rezko paid for 15 percent of Obama's first campaign, and Obama looked out in the state senate for Rezko's interests in low-income housing and in packing the state's hospital construction board.

Contract set-asides for minorities provide a lucrative opening for crooks like Rezko. The demand for "diversity" provides an excuse for a thumb on the scales, a justification for diverting the contract from the lowest bidder to a political ally who employs a minority frontman. Most of America's pundit class hasn't figured this out yet, but Rezko grasped how "diversity" works soon after getting off the plane. (Indeed, multicultural America is becoming ever more like the Ottoman Empire, giving an advantage to immigrants from old Ottoman mercantile minorities.)

Chicago explained: "Rezko ran Jabir Muhammad's firm, Crucial Concessions. Under Mayor Washington [remember that fundraiser?], Crucial won the concessions to sell food at city beaches."

Now I know why Chicago beach concession food in the 1980s was so untasty. The municipal hot dog stands were managed by the Nation of Islam and Tony Rezko!

Muhammad and Rezko worked the same minority set-aside scam with several high-grossing Panda Expresses at O'Hare airport. The Chicago Sun-Times reported on March 17, 2005:

"Two restaurants at O'Hare Airport have been allowed to rake in millions of dollars, even though the Daley administration learned back in 2002 that the company running them was probably a phony minority "front" for Panda Express and Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a top fund-raiser for Gov. Blagojevich. Crucial Inc. won the O'Hare concessions in part because it was certified as a minority-owned business. Its largest shareholder was listed as Jabir Herbert Muhammad, son of the late Nation of Islam founder, Elijah Muhammad. … The [Chicago minority contractor] program has been tarred by a relentless string of scandals…"[City ignored possible O'Hare 'front' for years, By Chris Fusco, Fran Spielman And Michael Sneed]

 

Jabir and Tony also got a $10 million affirmative action contract from SBC, the giant phone company whose president was William Daley, Mayor Richie Daley's brother, to run the payphones at the Cook County jail. Their designated owner-operator was a twofer under the quota of 35 percent of contracts reserved for minority and women-owned businesses: a black woman named Deloris Wade, although she happened to be dead.

Building on these black Chicago roots, Rezko eventually became the statewide power behind the throne when the Democrats swept to victory in the 2002 elections. Chicago Magazine reported:

"Rezko became a virtual one-man headhunting firm for staffing the Blagojevich administration, sending along recommended candidates, many of whom ended up getting appointments. … (The U.S. attorney here has charged that Rezko schemed to pack the government with his cronies so that they could peddle their influence.)"

Diversity sensitivity also provides a convenient justification for corruption. Blagojevich said he sought Rezko's

"advice on recommendations for agency directors for two reasons. Number one, I had every reason to think he was honest and independently successful in business and that he was able to bring us people who were not part of state government before. And he has connections and roots in the African American community, and he could help us with candidates . . . because part of what we wanted to do was to have a diverse administration." [More, in which I explain why Chicago, and thus Obama, is the way it is]

 

My published articles are archived at iSteve.com -- Steve Sailer

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
John W. Rogers Jr.
Who Am I?

John W. Rogers Jr. Is Chairman, CEO & Chief Investment Officer And Lead Portfolio Manager Of Ariel Investments. (Ariel Investments Website, www.arielinvestments.com, Accessed 5/20/08)

  • Ariel Investments Is A Privately Owned Chicago-Based Money Management Firm That Manages Separate Accounts For Corporate, Public, Union, And Non-Profit Organizations, As Well As Serves As The Investment Adviser To Its Publicly Traded, No-Load Mutual Funds. (Ariel Investments Web site, www.arielinvestments.com, Accessed 5/20/08)

Rogers And Other Ariel Executives, Who Do Business With The City Of Chicago Pensions, Gave Large Quantities Of Money To Chicago Mayor Richard Daley Despite Limits On Contributions For City Contractors Because Of A Loophole For Pension Funds. (Todd Lighty, Laurie Cohen and John McCormick, “How Daley Campaign Keeps The Cash Flowing,” Chicago Tribune, 2/18/07)

After Having Provided $117,500 To Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, Ariel Investment And Its Executives Are the Second Largest Contributors With Ties To State Pension Business, Managing $578 Million In State Pension Funds. (Dave McKinney and Chris Fusco, “Pension Fund Firms Big Donors To Gov,” Chicago Sun-Times, 10/3/05)

  • “Ariel President John Rogers Said The Donations Reflect A Close Philosophical Alignment With Blagojevich.” (Dave McKinney and Chris Fusco, “Pension Fund Firms Big Donors To Gov,” Chicago Sun-Times, 10/3/05)

John Rogers Has Been Connected To Tony Rezko Through Released Court Documents; The Government Case Against Rezko Stated That In 2004, Rezko Raised $22,500 For Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich Through Rogers. (U.S. vs. Rezko, Trail Exhibits, “Rezko Donation Chart June 2001 To August 2004,” U.S. Department Of Justice, www.usdoj.gov, 3/7/08) http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/hot/us_v_rezko_exhibits/2008_03_07/fob_chart_1.pdf

Facts About Me and Barack

“As An Illinois State Senator, Obama Appeared Before Illinois Pension Funds In 2000 And 2001 To Urge That They Provide More Business To Black-Owned Investment Houses Including, As It Happens, Ariel.” (Andrew Malcolm, “Obama And Rezko, The Early Years,” Los Angeles Times’ “Top Of The Ticket” Blog, latimesblogs.latimes.com, 4/7/08)

  • “In 2002, The Year After Obama Made The Pitch, The Illinois Teacher Retirement System Reported An 18% Increase In Assets Managed By Minority-Owned Firms. Ariel’s Share Grew To $442 Million By 2005.” (Andrew Malcolm, “Obama And Rezko, The Early Years,” Los Angeles Times’ “Top Of The Ticket” Blog, latimesblogs.latimes.com, 4/7/08)
  • “In 2006, After The Federal Investigation Became Public, The Teacher Pension Board Severed Its Relationship With Ariel, Concluding That Ariel’s Investment Returns Were Insufficient.” (Andrew Malcolm, “Obama And Rezko, The Early Years,” Los Angeles Times’ “Top Of The Ticket” Blog, latimesblogs.latimes.com, 4/7/08) “In 2005, Obama Took 23 Such Private Aircraft Flights, Some To Attend Fundraisers He Headlined. … Another Was On A Plane Controlled By John Rogers, The Chairman And CEO Of Chicago’s Ariel Capital Management.” (Lynn Sweet, “Obama In Flight,” The Hill, 2/2/06  (Article is in full below)
  • In June 2008, John Rogers Hosted An Economic Roundtable In Chicago That Featured Warren Buffet And Doubled As A Democratic Fundraiser At Which Attendees Needed To Contribute Or Raise $28,500. (Michael Luo And Christopher Drew, “Obama Picks Up Fund-Raising Pace,” The New York Times, 7/3/08)

John Rogers Was Previously Married To Desiree Glapion Rogers, Who Also Is A Bundler For Obama’s Campaign. (Matthew Mosk and Alec MacGillis, “Big Donors Among Obama's Grass Roots,” The Washington Post, 4/11/08; Obama For America Web site, www.barackobama.com, Accessed 5/19/08)

My Donations and Bundling for Barack
Rogers Is A Bundler For Obama’s Presidential Campaign And Has Committed To Raising Over $200,000. (Obama For America Web site, www.barackobama.com, Accessed 5/19/08)    From: www.barackbook.com/Profiles/JohnWRogersJr.htm
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ticket Special Report: Obama and Rezko, the early years

The trial of Antoin “Tony” Rezko, one-time patron to Sen. Barack Obama and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, has turned lurid.

Under cross-examination by Rezko attorney Joseph Duffy, star prosecution witness Stuart Levine, a Chicago-area lawyer, is admitting to conspiracy, extortion, bribery, fraud and other bad acts while he “served” at the Illinois public school teachers pension fund board.

At Duffy's urging, Levine is detailing 30 years of drug Syrian-born Tony Rezko big-time Illinois political fundraiser and one-time confidante of both Senator Barack Obama and Gov Rod Blagojevich is now on federal trial in Chicago where the inner workings of Chicago's political system are unfoldingusage including sordid day-long binges with other men at a Chicago inn called the Purple Hotel. Rezko's attorney Duffy is wondering whether all that cocaine, crystal meth and other drug use has perhaps fogged Levine's memory.

That aside, much of the trial's focus is on money -- much of it given in the form of campaign money in the careers of Obama and Blagojevich.

It’s an unfolding, seemingly local political story that’s fascinating in its revealing details about the subterranean world of business, financial and family connections in Illinois and Chicago politics that helped take a virtually unknown black Chicago attorney, nurtured him politically and financially and turned him into....

 

...the polished candidate who today thrills crowds of thousands across the country with his eloquence.

Obama currently leads in delegates for the Democratic nomination for president.

This tale is long by Ticket standards. We'll do this rarely. But for those interested in delving into details it provides important background about the early political connections of a little-known newcomer to the national political scene.

This story concerns two men, neither of whom face any legal charges today. They are two of Illinois’ top Democratic politicians -- Gov. Blagojevich, who's been mentioned often in court, and Sen. Obama, who's received only passing mentions. They're entwined in the Rezko saga, particularly through the bounteous campaign money he raised for them both.

Get used to that name. Rezko's currently in a long-running Chicago trial on federal extortion and bribery charges. Few campaign donors were more responsible than Rezko for the rise of Blagojevich (Blah-goy-ah-vitch) and Obama. Both politicians came to rely on him for political and personal advice -- and lots of campaign money.

Illinois Democrat Governor Rod Blagojevich like Illinois Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama a one-time confidante of Tony Rezko, now on trial in Chicago federal court

Their intimate relationship is coming into focus through Rezko, a Syrian-born businessman who made his money in real estate and restaurant franchises and now sits daily in the federal courtroom of U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve. The trial's daily events are covered in this Tribune Rezko court blog.

So far, Blagojevich, reelected in 2006, is more deeply enmeshed in the scandal than Obama, who's not been implicated in any wrongdoing.

But all three operated in the murky world of Illinois Democratic politics, where money, family relationships and long business associations provide the invisible glue of the local political world.

Witnesses in Rezko’s trial have testified that Rezko recommended friends and associates for government jobs and posts on Illinois state boards when Blagojevich took office in 2003, and some of those friends were generous donors to Blagojevich.

An early trial exhibit from prosecutors was a spreadsheet. Prepared by an FBI agent , the spreadsheet identifies Rezko-related donors who supplied $1.43 million between 2001 and 2004 to Blagojevich, who was first elected governor in 2002.

Using Federal Election Commission and Illinois state records, The Times' Dan Morain compared donors on the FBI spreadsheet to Obama’s contributors. Guess what.

Sen. Obama received $222,000 during the same 2001-2004 period from Rezko-related Blagojevich donors.

And Obama received at least another $32,000 from them for this presidential run -- although Rezko, indicted in 2006, has not been involved in Obama’s current campaign.

Those Obama-Blagojevich donors include Rezko himself, along with his family members, employees and associates of his various business enterprises. There’s also the head of a major Chicago investment firm that received Illinois public teachers' pension money to invest.

Jay Stewart, of the nonprofit government watchdog Better Government Assn. in Chicago, called the overlapping list of donors a “who’s who of the inner circle” of Democratic politics in the Land of Lincoln.

“Did they come from the same general political environment?” Stewart said of Blagojevich and Obama. “Yes. They’re Chicago pols. They both knew Tony Rezko. Tony Rezko raised money.”

In his presidential race, Obama increasingly has relied on small donations delivered via the Internet from more than a million individuals. But when he started in Illinois politics, Stewart noted, “if you wanted money, you needed to ask the big boys.”

Rezko was a big boy. He was, for instance, a link between Obama and Santa Monica developer Jay Wilton of Wilton Partners. On July 16, 2003, Wilton gave $5,000 to Obama’s first U.S. Senate run. A few days later, Wilton gave $50,000 to Blagojevich, Illinois state records show.
 
Unlike the federal system, Illinois state campaign finance law permits donors to give as much as they want to state candidates. So, in Illinois they do.

In early 2004, WiltIllinois senator and Democratic Party presidential candidate Barack Obama a one-time friend and confidante of Tony Rezko now on trial in Chicago federal courton and Rezko spent $78,000 on a Los Angeles-area fundraising tour for Blagojevich, Illinois campaign records show. Three Southern California companies donated a combined $150,000 to the Illinois governor during the trip.

Shortly before the initial $50,000 donation, Blagojevich announced that Wilton would begin work on an $83 million state contract to refurbish rest stops on Illinois tollways, called “oases.”

Some of the restaurant concessions granted the right to operate at those rest stops “trace back” to Blagojevich’s patrons including Rezko, the Chicago Tribune disclosed in 2005. Wilton, who did not return repeated calls, is not implicated in the Rezko case.

Another overlapping donor is John Rogers, head of Ariel Capital, a major Chicago-based investment firm. Rogers gave $12,500 to Blagojevich in 2004, the FBI spreadsheet shows. Rogers has also given Obama $25,000, state and FEC records reveal.

Aides to Obama and Rogers said the pair has a friendship that is separate from Rezko. Ariel vice president Matt Yale said Rogers’ inclusion on the FBI spreadsheet was a surprise, adding, “To the best of our knowledge, we have not made any contributions to Governor Blagojevich or any political candidate on behalf of Tony Rezko.” Ariel is not implicated in the criminal case.

As an Illinois state senator, Obama appeared before Illinois pension funds in 2000 and 2001 to urge that they provide more business to black-owned investment houses including, as it happens, Ariel.

Describing his efforts to the Urban League last year, Obama said African-American-owned firms were not getting any business from state pensions. Obama singled out Rogers’ Ariel Capital, calling it a well-respected investment house, but one that received no business.

“We didn't have to implement a formal program,” Obama told the Urban League, taking no credit. “I simply said, ‘Listen to what these folks have to say,’ and in about six months they got about a half billion dollars worth of business simply on their own excellence.”

In 2002, the year after Obama made the pitch, the Illinois Teacher Retirement System reported an 18% increase in assets managed by minority-owned firms. Ariel’s share grew to $442 million by 2005.

In 2006, after the federal investigation became public, the teacher pension board severed its relationship with Ariel, concluding that Ariel’s investment returns were insufficient.

As he was for Blagojevich in his initial run for governor in 2002, Rezko in 2003 and 2004 was part of Obama’s finance committee, responsible for raising campaign money.

Obama started out as a long shot. The main candidate was Blair Hull, a wealthy businessman who was financing his own campaign. But less than three weeks before the primary, a court unsealed multimillionaire Hull's divorce file, which alleged spousal abuse. The divorce case so damaged Hull that he finished third in the race. The four-year anniversary of that primary passed on Palm Sunday.

The eventual winner of that primary: Barack Obama.

-- Andrew Malcolm   (A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. ) Excerpted from: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/obamarezko.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FBI ASKED QUESTIONS ON REZKO/OBAMA LAND DEAL

"The complaint also said the grand jury wanted information on Mrs. Rezko's purchase ..."
Value at issue, appraiser says
 
Jerry Seper (Contact)
Tuesday, November 4, 2008

"Mr. Conner is asking Mr. Obama to make his lower appraisal review of his house public, saying it is relevant to his pending complaint. "

 
Also:Ill. Gov. Blagojevich arrested on federal charges

Was Obama Senate Seat For Sale?(Links Flesh Out The Story)

Feds: Blagojevich saw Obama's vacated job as a "valuable thing"

 
PHOTO and more links to major story at: 
 
 
hhat tip to Red Badger at Free Republic.com discussion
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Was Obama Senate Seat For Sale?(Links Flesh Out The Story)

Feds: Blagojevich saw Obama's vacated job as a "valuable thing"

DECEMBER 9--The criminal complaint filed today against Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich contains a remarkable section detailing the Democratic politician's alleged attempt to cash in on his ability to fill the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama.
Attached to the U.S. District Court complaint is an FBI affidavit, excerpted below, alleging that Blagojevich was caught on wiretaps noting that the Senate seat "is a f------ valuable thing, you just don't give it away for nothing." He was also recorded saying that unless "I get something real good," he would appoint himself to the vacancy. "I'm going to keep this Senate option for me a real possibility, you know, and therefore I can drive a hard bargain. You hear what I'm saying. And if I don't get what I want and I'm not satisfied with it, then I'll just take the Senate seat myself."
 
According to surreptitiously recorded conversations, Blagojevich spoke with associates about the possibility of trading the Senate post for either an ambassadorship or a Cabinet post. The politician, according to the affidavit sworn by FBI Agent Daniel Cain, "analogized his situation to that of a sports agent shopping a potential free agent to various teams."
 
During a wiretapped November 10 call, a frustrated and financially strapped Blagojevich referred to Obama as a "mother------" and said that he would not appoint an ally of the President-elect to the Senate vacancy if "I don't get anything." Referring to Obama, Blagojevich exclaimed, ..."   (more) at The Smoking Gun.com
Excerpted from:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/1209081rod1.html
 

Illinois Gov. Blagojevich, chief of staff, arrested

| Tribune staff reporters

 All links below will flesh out the complete story
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Zero," AKA for the one named NMP - Not My President - " Atlas Shugs

"There is, however, a great upside to the mystery never being solved, the truth never revealed, for Zero to continue stonewalling.  For then, Americans in the growing millions would view his presidency as illegal and illegitimate, and owe him neither allegiance nor obedience.  This would give them the moral resolve to resist the fascism of his laws, executive orders, and regulations. . "  Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs
 

Broe v Reed‏ (hat tip co2hog.com)

December 6, 2008

James Broe and 11 other Washington voters have filed in Washington’s Supreme Court to have the votes cast for Senator Obama set aside, because he failed to establish that he was even an American citizen running under his own name at the time of the election, let alone a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution. Unlike other cases that have been dismissed for lack of standing, these plaintiffs have standing under a unique Washington statute that allows any registered voter to challenge the election of someone who, at the time of the election, was ineligible to hold the office.

The Secretary of State’s office has already admitted it did nothing to determine Senator Obama’s eligibility, and Senator Obama hasn’t produced a single piece of evidence to prove he was born in the United States that would establish his eligibility, although the burden to prove his eligibility was placed on him by the rules of the national Democrat Party. Counsel for the plaintiffs Stephen Pidgeon had only a two word comment: “case closed!”

STEPHEN PIDGEON
Attorney at Law, P.S.

Documents in Broe v Reed‏:

Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Application for Writ of Mandamus
BROE v. REED Summons

OT but related:Group seeks to have state's votes for Obama set aside

Washington residents say Democrat never established he is natural-born American citizen hat tip OCM

Lightfoot v. Bowen: A new lawsuit

and Bill Richardson calls Obama an immigrant ...

UPDATE: Killer op-ed from Dr. Jack Wheeler hat tip Joan

Here's target number one.  "Zero," of course, is an alternate name for the individual we called NMP - Not My President - shortly after November 4.  Now it's turning out that vast multitudes don't look upon him as their president either, due to this crazy controversy over his birth certificate.

Crazy because producing a verifiably genuine birth certificate should be the simplest thing in the world to do, instantly squashing the controversy.  Yet Zero won't produce it, allowing the issue to metastasize to the point of full page ads in the Chicago Tribune

The ad sums up the issue, and it is a serious one.  Constitutionally restricting the presidency to natural-born citizens, thus excluding naturalized citizens is, for example, the one single barrier preventing Arnold Schwarzenegger from running for president.

That Zero refuses to release his actual birth certificate is proof for many that he is not natural born but naturalized instead.  Yet the two principal drivers of the controversy, my good buddies Joseph Farah and Jerry Corsi of WorldNetDaily, are not convinced of this.

They suspect that the real truth Zero is hiding may be even more bizarre than what everybody thinks.  I've known Joseph for many years and the details of what he told me is for him to reveal when he chooses, not me.  I can tell you it is OMG wild.

There is, however, a great upside to the mystery never being solved, the truth never revealed, for Zero to continue stonewalling.  For then, Americans in the growing millions would view his presidency as illegal and illegitimate, and owe him neither allegiance nor obedience.  This would give them the moral resolve to resist the fascism of his laws, executive orders, and regulations.

Which brings us to target number two.  Zero's willingness to sacrifice American prosperity on the altar of Global Warming should be the gift that keeps on giving to Republicans.

When he spoke via video to the "Governors' Global Climate Summit" on November 18, Zero sounded like an Algore lunatic:

"The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear. Sea levels are rising. Coastlines are shrinking. We've seen record drought, spreading famine, and storms that are growing stronger with each passing hurricane season."

Every bit of this is nonsense.  Either he is a scientific illiterate, as stupid as Algore, or is using the glowarm con as a rationale to expand government power - or maybe all three.  Whichever, his war upon "fossil fuels" such as oil and coal could not be better designed to ruin any chances of economic recovery.

Which gives Republicans the absolute perfect opportunity to target Zero and the other glowarmer nutballs in Congress at every moment the economy is not rebounding while we are shivering and suffering with global cooling - for in fact, due to the lack of the sun's magnetic activity, the earth is cooling, not warming.

This segways into a third target: Zero's anti-capitalist pro-government boondoggle bias.  He has no understanding of what is actually required for the "economic recovery" he boasts of achieving:  real jobs, rather than make-work government subsidized "green jobs;  reducing regulatory barriers rather than raising them; getting the government out of the way of entrepreneurs and small business rather than getting more and more in the way;  producing and using more energy rather than less.

It's not that he's a "Marxist" or "socialist."  More importantly, he's an economic illiterate as much as he's a scientific illiterate.  He hasn't a clue of how businesses work, having neither run or worked for one.

Thus his entire economic program will consist of handing out government subsidies to those with political connections - "political entrepreneurs."  Another golden opportunity for Republicans to skewer him for all the resultant corruption and failure to actually improve the economy.

A fourth target:  the coming lack of respect for America throughout the world.  Zero voters want the world to love us - and they are going to be rudely surprised to find out what counts in the world is respect, not love.  Under Zero, country after country will feel free to ignore America's interests or desires... (more)
 
Excerpted from Atlas Shrugs at:
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Supreme Court rejects Obama citizenship case"

"The Supreme Court rejected an attempt Monday to declare Barack Obama ineligible to be president. "

Supreme Court rejects Obama citizenship case

     

By Carrie Budoff Brown

The Supreme Court rejected an attempt Monday to declare Barack Obama ineligible to be president.

The court turned down a long-shot emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who claimed that Obama could not serve as president because he had dual nationality at birth. Since his mother was an American and his Kenyan father was a British subject, he failed to meet the constitutional standard of being a “natural born citizen,” argued Leo Donofrio of East Bunswick, N.J., in his appeal.

The court denied the request without providing an explanation, which is common practice. Donofrio’s suit was one of a few around the country seeking to nullify the election, but his had a noteworthy case history: It was referred to the high court by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court’s only African American.

The suit filed against New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells contested Obama’s claims to citizenship and therefore to the presidency and initially sought to stay the election. Alan Keyes, who was defeated by Obama in a race for the U.S. Senate in 2004, has filed a similar suit. During the campaign, a copy of Obama’s birth certificate was posted on his website, showing that he was born in Hawaii. A petition to stop the Electoral College from confirming Obama as the next president has been rejected by Justice David Souter. (more) Excerpted from: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16300.html

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16300.html

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Supreme Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

"The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth."  AP   20 minutes ago
 

Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

20 mins ago  Excerpted from Yahoo News

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama ... (More)   Excerpted from:

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

(Video)Supreme Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve

"The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth."
 

Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve   (Yahoo News)

  • WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg'... more  (Excerpted from Yahoo News 15 minutes ago)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »