About Me

Name: Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

You Decide: In New Video Did Bhutto Take A Bullet?

New video
 

(See Compilation of Videos and Stills  From Other Sources Below)


New Video Shows Bhutto Taking Bullet
Published: Dec. 31, 2007 at 7:46 AM


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Dec. 31 (UPI) -- A videotape released Monday shows former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto being struck by a bullet seconds before an explosion in Rawalpindi.

Bhutto was at a political rally Thursday and was videotaped standing up through the sunroof of her bomb-proofed car. Her hair and scarf can be seen moving as three shots rang out and she slumps back into the vehicle, CNN reported.

A second later, a bomb exploded and killed 23 other people.

Excerpted from UPI at
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrac k/Top_News/2007/12/31/new_video_shows_bhutto_taking_bullet/3587/

New Angle Shows Benazir Bhutto Struck By Bullet.
New footage of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination shows the impact of the bullet which lifted her hair and shawl and contradicts the Pakistan govts version of events.
Excerpted from: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117


Bhutto's hair and headscarf fly upward on the left side of her head just before she collapses  into her vehicle.



UPDATED: Mobile pictures -
Benazir was defintely shot dead before the Blast


 Excerpted from:

New Images updated below: Considering all the commotion and fuss created by the government of Pakistan saying the called that Benazir Bhutto was not hit by the three bullets but instead she hit her head on some lever of the sunroof. Last night I was contacted by a person via Orkut who had uploaded these images on his profile (now he has taken them off) he was offering to share his video to the extent that he gave his cell number in Islamabad, since his dial up did not permit transferring this heavy file.

On contacting him today he claimed that he was a PPP supporter and his party had instructed him not to share this with anyone. Later when a news reporter tried contacting him, his cell phone was switched off. I have two images to share with you which were initially taken off his Orkut Profile

The first image clearly shows Benazir Bhutto standing upright in the car through the sunroof waving to the crowd

benazir-before-shot-was-fired-thumb.jpg

The next image is just after the gun shots which were fired from the left but moments before the bomb blast. Here we see Benazir Bhutto not on the sunroof of the car most likely already shot and injured slumped inside

benazir-after-shot-was-fired-thumb.jpg

I sadly do not have the original video, though I tried very hard to get it. A source was in direct contact with the cameraman who actually shot the video and later uploaded the screen captures to show that he means serious business. He claimed to be in the security detail with Benazir Bhutto was riding on her car barely five minutes earlier but had to jump off as she exited the Liaquat Bagh venue. He was finding it difficult to upload the 56MB video file online so was ready to allow someone to help him get it readily available. Today morning he said that his cell phone was ringing off the hook with people clambering in the hunt for the video, hence forth he turned his cell phone off and had even removed the images from his Orkut profile.

NEW IMAGES UPLOADED BELOW

Today evening my source was been able to find the other two images that were initially uploaded to the cameramans profile,

The third image in this series shows the crowd and the cameraman suspects the white hooded fellow to be the actual bomber

benazir-bhutto-assassin-picture-thumb.jpg

This last image is taken 15 seconds later after the bomb blast showing total carnage

benzir-bhutto-after-bomb-blast-thumb.jpg

One thing is for sure that she was shot before the bomb blast hit her and the shockwave had nothing to do with it (as speculated by the Government representatives. It must be noted that the Government of Pakistan or some tom-dick-n-harry agency has in effect scared away the cameraman from sight and he is no longer in contact, but I am proud to say that the truth will always prevail.

DISCLAIMER: The images are the actual images taken off his orkut profile and the explanation and the captions and text appearing on the images were all done by him.

Excerpted from

http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/2007/12/29/mobile-pictures-benazir-was-defintely-shot-dead-before-the-blast/

More Actual Video Below

Excerpted From WWW. Live Leak.com at:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117

Posted: 9 hours ago , by: barnesy
A Forensic Look At Bhutto's Death.
The argument is still raging over exactly how Benazir Bhutto died. Pakistan's government claims she was killed by the force of a suicide bomb but her supporters say the opposition leader was clearly shot

Posted: 12 hours ago , by: bellava
Inside Bhutto's Car Shows Bloody End
Images have been released of the armored vehicle Benazir Bhutto was in prior to her assasination. Allegations of a possible cover-up have arisen and violent protests have killed dozens throughout the country since her death Thursday. (Dec. 30)

Posted: 22 hours ago , by: barnesy
New Angle Shows Benazir Bhutto Struck By Bullet.
New footage of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination shows the impact of the bullet which lifted her hair and shawl and contradicts the Pakistan govts version of events.
Excerpted from:http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117


And Lastly From UTube:





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For The Record: "Bill Clinton Won't Attend NSC Meetings" Says His Wife, Wannabe Prez Hillary.


"Sen. Hillary Clinton said today her husband will take on the same responsibilities as traditional presidential spouses, with no access to National Security Council meetings." ABC news


Bill Clinton Won't Attend NSC Meetings in a Hillary White House  (Excerpt)

December 29, 2007 2:41 PM

ABC News' Jonathan Greenberger reports: If she makes it to the White House, Sen. Hillary Clinton said today her husband will take on the same responsibilities as traditional presidential spouses, with no access to National Security Council meetings.

"I think he would play the role that spouses have always played for presidents," said Clinton, in an exclusive interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos. "He will not have a formal, official role, but just as presidents rely on wives, husbands, fathers, friends of long years, he will be my close confidante and adviser as I was with him."

The candidate said having President Clinton participate in National Security Council meetings "wouldn't be appropriate," and in a crisis situation – like the one faced by President Bush this week after the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto – President Clinton would not sit in on discussions with his wife’s national security team.

But Sen. Clinton did say she expects the former president to play a role as an informal adviser to the White House staff.

"I'm going to expect that people in my administration will turn to him and rely on him, as we do with many people who have experience," she said.

Throughout her presidential campaign, Clinton has repeatedly said she would send President Clinton around the world on the United States’ behalf as a roving ambassador... 
Excerpted: For more go to: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/12/bill-clinton-ba.html
____________________________________________________________________________

Photo and comments excerpted from Free Republic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945700/posts

Where my attention to the above "news article" was originally captured by this photo.

Caption: "He doesn't need to go to National Security Council meetings... he can just send his nest of Chinese spies like John Huang and Moctar Riady. " Bon mots


19 posted on 12/29/2007 5:04:04 PM EST by Bon mots

All credit for above statement and photo posting to Bon mots at Free Republic. com at :http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945700/posts

and this thought on the subject of  Bill Clinton Won't Be Attending  NSC Meetings in a Hillary White House 

"These people are on LSD"


5 posted on 12/29/2007 4:40:13 PM EST by Lancey Howard also on FreeRepublic.com

All credit for this thought above to Lancey Howard on FreeRepublic.com.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Pakistan's middle-class was ready for a move back toward democracy" according to an NPR Report in April 2007.

Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:28 PM

 "Ahmed Rashid, author of the best-selling Taliban and Jihad, argues that Musharraf has misjudged his country's mood, that Pakistan's middle-class is ready for a move back toward democracy and that they're ready for Musharraf to step down." Fresh Air on NPR 

 

  • Audio for today's show will be available at approx. 3:00 p.m. ET

ALL CREDIT TO NPR AND FRESH AIR AND TO HOST TERRI GROSS

By Ahmed Rashid
Thursday, March 22, 2007; A21

LAHORE, Pakistan -- In the rapidly unfolding crisis in Pakistan, no matter what happens to President Pervez Musharraf -- whether he survives politically or not -- he is a lame duck. He is unable to rein in Talibanization in Pakistan or guide the country toward a more democratic future.

Since March 9, when Musharraf suspended the chief justice of the Supreme Court, Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, public protests have escalated every day -- as has a violent crackdown by the police and intelligence agencies on the media and the nation's legal fraternity.

The legal convolutions about Chaudhry's dismissal boil down to one simple fact: He was not considered sufficiently reliable to deliver pleasing legal judgments in a year when Musharraf is seeking to extend his presidency by five more years, remain as army chief and hold what would undoubtedly be rigged general elections.

Musharraf's desire to replace Chaudhry with a more pliable judge has badly backfired. After just 10 days of protests, lawyers around the country have made it clear to the senior judiciary that they will not tolerate further legal validations for continued military rule or tolerate Musharraf remaining as president. At least seven judges and a deputy attorney general have resigned in protest.

Across the country, in law offices, in the media, among the opposition parties and other organized sections of civil society, the feeling is growing that Musharraf will have to quit sooner rather than later. After eight years of military rule it appears people have had enough.

Moreover, Musharraf is losing control of three key elements that have sustained his rule but are now either distancing themselves or turning on him completely. The first is the ruling Pakistan Muslim League Party, which has acted as the civilian appendage to the military but faces an election and knows that going to bat for the unpopular Musharraf will turn off voters. Party leaders and cabinet ministers are already distancing themselves from him.

The second element is the country's three intelligence agencies, which are at loggerheads over control of Musharraf, Pakistan's foreign policy, its political process and the media. Military Intelligence and the Inter-Services Intelligence are military agencies, while the largest civilian agency, the Intelligence Bureau, is now run by a military officer. Ironically, Inter-Services Intelligence, the most powerful agency in the country, has been the moderate element urging Musharraf to open up the political system to the opposition parties. The other two agencies are the hard-liners and are urging Musharraf to adopt even tougher measures.

The third loss for Musharraf has been the unqualified international support he has received since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Anger in the U.S. Congress and media, and particularly among members of the Republican Party, toward Musharraf's dual-track policy in Afghanistan -- helping to catch al-Qaeda members but backing the Taliban -- is making it difficult for President Bush to continue offering Musharraf his blanket support.

That was the tough-love message that Vice President Cheney delivered to Musharraf in Islamabad last month: Unless Musharraf goes after the Taliban, the Bush administration can no longer protect him.


Any loss of Western support will be critical to the army, which is on an arms-buying spree and depends on annual U.S. military aid of about $300 million. Musharraf has balanced the pro- and anti-American factions in the army's officer corps, but if both sides see him as a lame duck, unable to deliver the goods or stabilize the country, their support will dwindle.


Musharraf is now too weak to pursue policies that could keep his back-stabbers in check, restore his credibility at home and abroad, and pursue his agenda of remaining in power for the next five years.

It is far better that he revert to the promise he made when he seized power in 1999: to return the country to democracy. His best course of action would be to say he is not a candidate for president, hold free and fair elections, allow the return of exiled politicians, restore full political rights and gracefully depart with his legacy, which is considerable, intact.


It is in the interest of the United States to support such an exit strategy. The military can no longer counter the phenomenal growth of Islamic extremism in Pakistan through offensives alone. What the country needs is greater political consensus and a popularly elected government, and to replace the extortions of the mullahs with the return of day-to-day parliamentary politics. Excerpted: For more go to The
Washington Post  at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/21/AR2007032101786_pf. 
All credit to The Washington Post
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Pakistan's uncertain year ahead
Ahmed Rashid
By Ahmed Rashid, Lahore

Gen Pervez Musharraf
'The key issue is what political alliances Gen Musharraf will broker'

Pakistan is moving into a new year that will be critical for the country's future political direction.

The government says everything is on schedule for the re-election of President Pervez Musharraf and general elections by the end of 2007.

Yet Pakistanis are still gripped with severe bouts of uncertainty and few believe the government's assurances.

The unpredictability of what will actually happen is already affecting business confidence, say economists.

Islamic extremist groups, the mainstream Islamic parties and exiled national leaders are more interested in a showdown with Gen Musharraf to curtail his powers, or remove him from office, than an election.

Fortunately for the military, the opposition parties are deeply divided among themselves.

The reason for the uncertainty, that will last all of next year, is that the decision will be made by one man - Gen Musharraf himself - because in Pakistan there is no institutionalised, well-worn democratic succession process and the constitution is a mere piece of paper that can be altered by decree.

After seven years of Gen Musharraf and the military, people are tired of the army and looking for change


The government scenario elaborated to me by leading figures of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League (PML) says that next autumn Gen Musharraf will likely go for an endorsement from the present National Assembly and provincial assemblies as president for the next five years.

Rumours of a deal

He will then dissolve parliament, set up a three-month caretaker government that will hold free and fair elections and then go for a second endorsement as president in 2008.

Most PML politicians do not expect him to relinquish his role in the military, in which case he will remain as both army chief and president.

However the decisions all lie with Gen Musharraf and his handful of military advisers rather than the ruling party or the prime minister - hence so much uncertainty.

Protests against Gen Musharraf
'Islamic groups are looking for a showdown with Gen Musharraf'
The key issue is what political alliances Gen Musharraf will broker for the election.

After his recent outbursts against extremism and the need for people to vote for moderates, rather than religious extremists, the long-running speculation that the army has struck a deal with the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and its leader in self-imposed exile, Benazir Bhutto, are rife.

Both sides deny any deal, despite the political buzz.

However Gen Musharraf has made it clear that the return of Benazir Bhutto is out of the question. So too, he says, is the return of the prime minister he deposed, Nawaz Sharif, the exiled leader of another faction of the PML.

So why should the PPP cut a deal when its leader will not be allowed to campaign or stand for elections?

If there is a compromise and a deal with the PPP, it would mean the military breaking of its alliance with the Islamic parties that presently rule the provinces of Balochistan and the North West Frontier.

It is something that many in the US and western Europe are desperate to see happen and would clearly applaud.

The problem is that the PML and its leader Chaudry Shujjat Hussain, in particular, see the PPP as a major threat to their monopoly on power at the centre and in the largest province Punjab.

Concrete assurances

Moreover the logic of a deal with the PPP would mean that the military would also have to cast their lot with smaller secular Baloch and Pashtun nationalist parties in Balochistan and the NWFP - which the army is loathe to do because they oppose the continuation of military rule.

Again Gen Musharraf will have the last word and it is likely that he will only declare his political alliances at the last moment, thus fuelling continued uncertainty about the future.

The best option for a genuine step forward to democratisation would be for Gen Musharraf to announce that he would stand as a civilian president, that genuinely free and fair elections would be held and the future government would be freely determined on the election outcome.

Benazir Bhutto
'Speculation is rife that the army has struck a deal with Benazir Bhutto'
To gain public confidence he would also need to pledge that the elections would genuinely empower parliament and the next prime minister and that he and the army would take a back seat.

That would need concrete assurances such as a pledge to remove over 1,000 army officers who presently occupy key civilian posts in the government, economic institutions, media and the universities.

Thus the polls would be a transformative election moving the country slowly towards full and genuine civilian rule.

After seven years of Gen Musharraf and the military, people are tired of the army and looking for change.

Moreover only a genuine civilian government could begin the attempt to start a reconciliation process with all the alienated, angry elements of society such as the Baloch nationalists and the Pashtun extremists in the tribal agencies bordering Afghanistan.

Is such a transformative election likely?
 Excerpted: For more go to :

All Credit To the BBC NEWS
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6211639.stm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Top Secret Iraqi Files Found: Saddam Really Did Have WMDs"


LoftusReport.com ^ | October 25, 2007 | John Loftus.

 http://www.loftusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/loftus-wmd-final.pdf

We live in an age of documents. There are no more secrets, only deferred disclosures.

Saddam Hussein's secret documents are measured by the shelf-mile and stored inside a secure but dusty facility near U.S. Central Command Headquarters in Doha, Qatar, and in several subsidiary sites.



Armed guards protect the unread dossiers. Three shifts of two hundred translators each work around the clock. Perhaps 5% of these captured documents have been studied so far, but their contents are about to shatter much of the conventional wisdom concerning Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.


The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at the disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The "Bush lied, people died" chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq.


Each side is more than a little bit wrong abou Saddam's WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.


(Excerpt) Read more at loftusreport.com ...



Another Report in full from FrontPage Magazine.Com:

Shattering Conventional Wisdom About Saddam's WMD's



FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | November 16, 2007 | John Loftus  Excerpted

 

We live in an age of documents. There are no more secrets, only deferred disclosures. Saddam Hussein's secret documents are measured by the shelf-mile and stored inside a secure but dusty facility near U.S. Central Command Headquarters in Doha, Qatar, and in several subsidiary sites. Armed guards protect the unread dossiers. Three shifts of two hundred translators each work around the clock. Perhaps 5% of these captured documents have been studied so far, but their contents are about to shatter much of the conventional wisdom concerning Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at the disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The "Bush lied, people died" chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq.[1] Each side is more than a little bit wrong about Saddam's WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.

The gist of the new evidence is this: roughly one quarter of Saddam's WMD was destroyed under UN pressure during the early to mid 1990's. Saddam sold approximately another quarter of his weapons stockpile to his Arab neighbors during the mid to late 1990's. The Russians insisted on removing another quarter in the last few months before the war. The last remaining WMD, the contents of Saddam's nuclear weapons labs, were still inside Iraq on the day when the coalition forces arrived in 2003, but were stolen from under the Americans’ noses and sent to Syria. Syria is one of eight countries in the world that never signed a treaty banning WMD, and now is the storehouse for much of what remains of Saddam's WMD Empire. This was the target of the recent Israeli air strike.

There are only a few people in the world who were close to being right all along about Saddam's WMD. One of them was Yossef Bodansky, a noted intelligence analyst and former director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare.[2] On page 496 of Bodansky’s book, "The Secret History of the Iraq War" he makes the astounding assertion that:

".. .The United States had long known that Saddam moved virtually all production capabilities to Libya and Sudan somewhere between 1996 and 1998. Subsequently, in the summer of 2002, with Tehran's consent, the residual chemical weapons production capabilities were shipped to Iran..."[3]

In other words, is Bodansky is right (and he usually is) as late as 2002, Saddam still retained a CW production capability and then sold it to the Iranians on the eve of war.[4] The CIA has now acknowledged that they had a highly-placed spy in Saddam's cabinet who agreed that Saddam had gotten rid of all of his production facilities, but the super spy claimed that Saddam still retained a lethal stockpile of finished chemical weapons in early 2003. The latter information, about the remaining CW stockpile, turns out to have been incorrect, but neither the CIA nor their Iraqi super spy knew it at the time.[5]

After Saddam's brother-in-law Kemal Hussein defected to Jordan in the mid 1990's and exposed some (but not all) of the numerous Iraqi WMD programs, Saddam started over from scratch on WMD production, using a small and secret cadre of new program leaders. Among the newly-disclosed documents are Saddam's actual tape recordings of the meetings of this special group for WMD.

The National Security Agency has confirmed[6] that the tapes are authentic and that the voiceprints are unquestionably those of Saddam and his elite WMD advisers. The CIA's super-spy, excluded from this working group, apparently did not know that it even existed. (His voice appears nowhere on the tapes.) He simply could not have known what Saddam was doing with his WMD programs, let alone with his CW stockpile.[7]

Most of the audio recordings of the secret WMD group are undated, as the CD on which they were found is a compilation of tapes of various WMD meetings stretching over a decade. But their tone is consistent not only with other recorded WMD meetings but with the newly-released document intelligence archives, many of which are revealed here for the first time through the assistance of author and geopolitical analyst Mr. Ryan Mauro.[8] Mauro cautions that "the recently declassified documents have the potential to shatter any conclusions or judgments about what Saddam Hussein's regime was up to. Until all these documents are translated and analyzed, it is premature to reach any conclusion."

Translating shelf miles of documents, however, may take decades. In the meantime, enough of Saddam's secret files have been translated to illustrate one clear trend over time: through the time of Hans Blix and the run-up to the invasion, Saddam had absolutely no intention of destroying his WMD.

In the last year of his regime, Saddam was in fact still trying to expand his chemical weapons capability. In January 2002, his advisors discussed research into a precursor for Sarin nerve gas.[9] In September 2002, for example, only seven months before the war, Saddam's Military Industrial Commission approved the illegal production of the precursor chemicals used to make Tabun nerve gas.[10] Four days later, another office discussed plans to import a banned compound, phosphorus pentasulfate. The UN had required Iraq to prove that it had destroyed all of its stocks of this chemical, which is a precursor for VX nerve gas. Instead, they were importing more of it.[11] In October 2002, Saddam's Director of Planning ordered more than forty tons of various chemicals which, when mixed together, would make Zyclon B – the poison gas used by the Nazis to kill millions of Jews during the Holocaust.[12] Saddam's scientists appear never to have met a poison gas they did not like.

The secret planning for banned chemical weapons in 2002 was no last-minute decision of desperation on the eve of war. Rather, it typified Saddam's long, well-thought-out plan to deceive the UN – an ongoing project that went back more than a decade. For example, Saddam's intelligence service sent out a memo in 1997 ordering his staff not to destroy any WMD but to conceal prohibited materials, "hide equipment and documents....make sure that labs are cleaned of any traces of chemical or biological substances."[13] That was the real Saddam: hide the WMD documents, clean up the tell-tale evidence.

Beginning in 1998, Saddam’s staff went into overdrive to conceal their illegal WMD programs: "The researchers [sic] that cannot be declared and that is related with the previous prohibited programs of WMD and how to make sure that information about these researchers will not leak to the outside world."[14] Files from 1999, marked “Top Secret”, confirm that the Iraqi army had a "chemical platoon" that was undergoing training in every form of illegal chemical weapons.[15] By 2001, the regime ensured that their chemical platoons had mobile shower vehicles for decontamination.[16] Similarly, the production of mobile labs (which the Duelfer report concluded had ended in 1997) were still being manufactured in 2002.[17]

There can be no doubt that instead of destroying his WMD in 1991, Saddam had a clear intent to revive his WMD production, to expand it and to hide it from the UN inspectors as late as 2002. So where did the stockpile of chemical weapons go in 2003?

John Shaw knew. He had seen this kind of scam before. This, as the Texans say, was not his first rodeo. John (Jack) Shaw, was a distinguished civil servant who was pushed out of the US Department of Defense shortly after the 2004 elections. He was the point man for tracking the mass of conventional weapons and prohibited technology that was found in Iraq. He did his job well, apparently too well for the comfort of some government officials.

As Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Shaw’s job was to track illegal sales of conventional weapons all over the world, but particularly in Iraq. Shipping arms to Iraq was a direct violation of the UN embargo order and US law. There was a good bit of that going on in the run-up to the war. Saddam had a lot of money and European arms merchants had a lot of weapons to sell, often with a wink and a nod from their home governments. Shaw unearthed evidence of a million tons of high explosives and evidence of high tech weaponry - and also, in the course of this work tracking conventional weapons, the scent of WMD.

As an example of Shaw’s work on illegal conventional weapons sales to Iraq, US troops discovered after the invasion, and reported through his office, that, despite the UN embargo, Saddam had been able to purchase the latest Roland II anti-aircraft missile launcher, a very effective French weapons platform for shooting down helicopters. The date of manufacture stamped on the Rolands was January 2003.

French arms manufacturers, in other words, had been selling to Saddam right up to the opening of the war. They later explained that France had sold the Roland to Syria, and that Syria was not covered by the embargo. The French claimed to be shocked that Syria had sold the Roland to their fellow Ba'athists in Baghdad. It should be noted that, for more than a year prior to the French sale the Israeli press had been publicly exposing Syria as an arms front for Saddam.

It is also hard to credit the Russians' claim that they were similarly shocked to discover that a corrupt Ukrainian arms dealer had sold scores of Moscow's high tech Kornet anti­tank missiles to Saddam. The Kornet is the only hand held missile in the world that can penetrate the super-heavy armor of the American main battle tank, the Ml Al Abrams. Two of the Abrams were knocked out of action by Kornets in Iraq. It was Shaw's unit that tracked the Kornet. "Its provenance was obvious," Shaw said, "and the Russian silence in response to our exposure was deafening."

In terms of WMD, newly released documents from Saddam’s government suggest that the Russians knew exactly what they were doing when it came to hiding illegal weapons. While Russian scientists were working hand-in-hand with Iraqi scientists on WMD, Russian spies inside CENTCOM were warning Saddam how to avoid detection from the UN inspectors. Saddam's secret files also mention an Associated Press reporter who passed information on how the UN inspection teams were being trained.[18] The Russian Ambassador himself handed over many of America's secret war plans.[19]

Most importantly, Saddam’s intelligence services credit Russia’s critical help in misleading the UN into thinking that Iraq was in compliance with the resolution paragraphs requiring destruction of its WMD. “We have succeeded in a few of the UN paragraphs…we have won Russia, ahhh…we have convinced Russia by way of generous accounts.” [20]

It should be noted that France, Russia and China were the three largest exporters of Saddam's oil before the war. They were also, according to the documents now being released, the three nations most involved with illegal weapons sales to Saddam. The oil profits, of course, were huge, and according to minutes from secret meetings, Saddam's intelligence service knew how to dangle the bait of illegal oil profits to, in their words, "commit some nations like France, China, Russia and Japan to economical agreements that make the implementation of the smart sanctions to have negative effect to the interests of these nations."[21] In English the word for this is “bribery” – on a huge scale.

Excerpted: For More go to:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=F715A709-2614-4EA5-967C-F6151F94A364

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bill & Hillary Greatest Hits (Visuals From Creative Bloggers)

"We could let you see her files, but then we'd have to kill you."

 


34 posted on 12/19/2007 7:18:41 PM EST by Maceman Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941954/posts


 

To:

26 posted on 12/16/2007 11:36:14 AM EST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald) Excerpted from Free Republic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940272/posts


 

 

Case #1:


11 posted on 12/19/2007 8:03:29 PM EST by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942022/posts


To:
19 posted on 12/19/2007 8:30:47 PM EST by CASchack
Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942029/posts


How did the Clintons become multi-millionaires with no visible means of support?


33 posted on 12/15/2007 10:10:29 PM EST by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.) Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940117/posts


To:
Her support slipped?

Ewwwww.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
8 posted on 12/19/2007 3:27:55 PM EST by Bon mots Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941877/posts

To:
I made that Camealot image ages ago, and nobody ever 'got it' until I hyphenated it.

People told me that I mis-spelled "Camelot" and nobody ever seemed to notice anything fishy about it. There are actually two modifications to Monica over the original... her left hand has been moved too. :-)
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
37 posted on 12/18/2007 12:47:57 PM EST by Bon mots  Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941155/posts

To:
Bill wouldn't lie or anything, right? Nah.


162 posted on 12/18/2007 6:02:23 PM EST by silent_jonny (Huckabee—THE DNC’S CHOICE) Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941079/posts 

And lastly just for the hell of it....
To:
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
26 posted on 12/18/2007 9:06:24 PM EST by don-o (Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever) Excerpted from FreeRepubic.com at:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941476/posts

All of the above were excerpted from recent blog postings.
All credit goes to the wonderful imaginations and creative genius posters at:
http://www.freerepublic.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) involved in raising funds to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President.

"

According to a fundraising web site for the Senator, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) activists are involved in raising funds from 100 Dollars to 2300 Dollars to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President. " Asian Tribune


Excerpted from The Asian Tribune
at: http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699

 

The LTTE is heavily involved in fund raising for Hilary Clinton in New Jersey

By Walter Jayawardhana


Los Angeles, 13 December, (Asiantribune.com):
Well known activists of a banned terrorist group in the United States are involved in the fund raising activities of the US Democratic candidate Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton.


According to a fundraising web site for the Senator, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) activists are involved in raising funds from 100 Dollars to 2300 Dollars to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President.


New Jersey residents have expressed the fear, that the LTTE or the Tamil Tigers could flush supporters with millions of dollars, to buy influence over the next possible President of the United States of America by infiltrating into democratic fund raising machine.


An email distributed by a female activist, Pat Pathmakumar for the group under the name “Tamils for Clinton” has appealed to contribute for the Clinton fund by sending checks to her or a man named Ram Ranjan, a man who organized the LTTE Heroes day meeting in New Jersey last year. Ranjan has publicly admitted he raised funds for the LTTE front, the Tamil Rehabilitation Organization (TRO).


The terrorist group, that introduced innovative methods like suicide jackets to many terrorist groups in the world, is listed as a foreign terrorist group by the State Department and the US Federal police , the FBI has alleged that the group had offered to them millions of dollars as bribes to lift the ban. The group is alleged to be using bribes to buy influence in India, Malysia and Sri Lanka. The money is being earned mostly by fraudulent business, credit card scams, drug running , voluntary fund raising and extortions of the Tamil Diaspora, according to a recent report of the JanesDefense weekly.


According to the Clinton website a leading LTTE activist, who came to live in New Jersey in 1994, called Ram Ranjan is one of the fund raisers of the Clinton campaign. Several others who are connected with him are also listed among the fund raisers.


He has earlier admitted that he had raised funds for the Tamil Tigers front organization called Tamil Rehabilitation Organization (TRO) which has raised funds purportedly for humanitarian purposes but actually diverted those funds for terrorist activities from many countries in the world.

The State Department has identified the TRO as a front organization of the LTTE and it is banned in many countries in the world.


An year ago he told a New Jersey newspaper called Star Ledger that although he supported the TRO it is not connected with the terrorist group LTTE.

The Star Ledger reported, “ … ……… he serves as state coordinator of the Tamil Rehabilitation Organization, which raises money for medical services, schools and orphanages and the victims of the LTTE, not the LTTE, Ranjan said.”


The Star Ledger
newspaper interviewed Ranjan an year ago after he was involved in organizing a LTTE heroes day commemorating meeting with accepted leaders of the LTTE in the US as speakers, local residents said. Pro LTTE website the Tamil Net said that the function started by hoisting LTTE separatist flag. The meeting was organized by a front organization of the LTTE, the South Asian Community Association.


The Sri Lankan Tamil group held the memorial meeting to eulogize dead Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) fighters including suicide bombers as heroes but told the New Jersey newspaper "Star-Ledger" they did not have any connections with a terrorist group.

The group called South Asian Community Association or SACA with Ranjan as an organizer caught attention after it rented an auditorium of the south Brunswick middle School in New Jersey, USA for a memorial to eulogize the dead LTTE fighters including those suicide bombers who targeted unarmed civilians and raised the flag of the LTTE and sang the anthem of the group on December 02 2006.


The meeting was addressed by known leaders of the LTTE in the United States, Visuvanadan Rudrakumaran and Dr. Naglingam Jeyalingam. Some have complained that the meeting held at this government school which was claimed by the Tamil Net website to be 500 also raised funds for the banned terrorist group.


The Star-Ledger
newspaper of New Jersey who published two consecutive news articles about the group who rented the Brunswick school reported that , "
 For more of article go to:http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699 


Excerpted from the - Asian Tribune - at : http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699 


Excerpted from Lanka Newspapers at: http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2007/5/14621.html

LTTE provides innovative terror tactics to other terrorist groups - The USA
Saturday, 5 May 2007 - 9:37 PM SL Time

In its Country Reports on Terrorism submitted to the US Congress the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that the Sri Lankan terrorist group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) led other terrorist groups in the world by giving them many innovative ideas.

`Many LTTE innovations,` said the report, `such as explosive belts, vests, and bras, using female suicide bombers, and waterborne suicide attacks against ships, have been copied by other terrorist groups.`

U.S. law requires the Secretary of State to provide Congress, by April 30 of each year, a full and complete report on terrorism with regard to those countries and groups meeting criteria set forth in the legislation. This annual report is entitled Country Reports on Terrorism. Beginning with the report for 2004, it replaced the previously published Patterns of Global Terrorism.

In its South and Central Asian section the report said, while the Maosists in Nepal signed a peace agreement in contrast the LTTE continued with its terrorist attacks.

`In Nepal and Sri Lanka, terrorism carried out by the Maoists and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) posed a severe challenge to those governments,` the report said.

The report said, `On an encouraging note, in November, the Maoists signed a peace agreement with the Government of Nepal that provided, under certain disarmament conditions, that the Maoists could be admitted into an interim government.

In Sri Lanka, the LTTE continued attacks including targeted assassinations against political and military opponents.`

The Secretary of State told the Congress that, the LTTE financed itself with contributions from the Tamil Diaspora in North America, Europe, and Australia, and by imposing local `taxes` on businesses operating in the areas of Sri Lanka under its control. Using this money, LTTE weapons were purchased on the international black market or captured from the Sri Lankan Army.

The following is the full report in the Sri Lanka section:

`The 2002 cease-fire between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, continued to erode amidst numerous violations and escalating military engagement between the LTTE and government security forces. The Sri Lankan Army remained deployed across the country to fight the insurgency. The paramilitary Special Task Force (STF) police were deployed both in the east and in strategic locations in the west.

`The LTTE conducted a campaign of targeted assassinations against political and military opponents. This included the April assassination attempt of Sri Lanka Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka and the assassination of the Army Third-in-Command; the August 12 assassination of the Government of Sri Lanka`s Secretariat for the Coordination of the Peace Process, Deputy `Director Keteshwaran Loganathan; and the December 1 suicide bomber`s attempt on the life of Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the President`s brother.

The Karuna faction, a dissident faction of the LTTE, conducted its own assassination campaign against the LTTE and pro-LTTE civilians in the east.

`Following the assassination of Foreign Minister Kadirgamar in August 2005, the government enacted emergency regulations giving arrest power to members of the armed forces, who were required to turn suspects over to the police within 24 hours. Individuals arrested under the emergency regulations may be detained for up to one year. Under these regulations, 148 persons were arrested; most have already been released. A revised Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), enacted in December, strengthened these powers.

`The LTTE financed itself with contributions from the Tamil Diaspora in North America, Europe, and Australia, and by imposing local `taxes` on businesses operating in the areas of Sri Lanka under its control. Using this money, LTTE weapons were purchased on the international black market or captured from the Sri Lankan Army. Many LTTE innovations, such as explosive belts, vests, and bras, using female suicide bombers, and waterborne suicide attacks against ships, have been copied by other terrorist groups.

In general, the LTTE did not target U.S. citizens or assets, limiting attacks to Sri Lankan security forces, political figures, civilians, and businesses. However, two suicide bomb attacks on VIP motorcades in Colombo occurred within half a mile of the U.S. embassy on roads frequently travelled by Embassy employees.

`Sri Lankan cooperation with the FBI has resulted in arrests of persons charged with material support to terrorist groups. The Sri Lankan government cooperated with U.S. efforts to track terrorist financing, although no assets were identified." (For more go to link below)
Excerpted from Lanka Newspapers at: http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2007/5/14621.html

Source(s)
• defence.lk

More Background:


03:37 From: chllptr
Views: 1,243
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzs076RDJyI&mode=related&search=


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Contributions By Employer For Hillary Clinton For President" Federal Election Commission

Excerpted from:
Federal Election Commission


CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER
 for Hillary Clinton for President

      PO Box 101436
      Arlington, Virginia   22210
NOTE: Address IS Different than previously reported

FEC Committee ID #: C00431569

This report contains activity for a Primary Election

Report type: April Quarterly

For election on 11/04/2008

This Report is an Amendment

Filed 11/12/2007

EMPLOYER SUM
NO EMPLOYER WAS SUPPLIED   2,139,070.98
'VICTIMS OF TORTURE'   500.00
01:CONCEPT LLC   250.00
1305 S RIVER MEADOWS DR   1,000.00
1906 SPRUCE STREET ASSOC. LP   4,600.00
1919 LLC   250.00
1ST CREDIT BANK   6,900.00
2 CHICKS IN COMPANY   4,600.00
2 JPL ASSOCIATES LLC   4,600.00
20TH CENTURY FOX   2,300.00
20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP   2,300.00
2130 PARTNERS   250.00
26 FILMS LLC   9,200.00
2HB   9,200.00
2ND PARAMUS PINES LLC   2,300.00
3 ARTS ENTERTAINMENT   9,200.00
30SEVEN DESIGN   250.00
3H TECHNOLOGIES   2,000.00
3M   250.00
5.12 CONSTRUCTION   4,600.00
66M DEVELOPERS LLC   4,600.00
85 BROADS UNLIMITED LLC   4,600.00
910 SOUTH 111TH PLAZA   250.00
A & E PROPERTIES   2,000.00
A GLIMMER OF HOPE FOUNDATION   2,000.00
A MANO INC.   2,000.00
A MOSES & ASSOCIATES   2,300.00
A TOUCH HOME HEALTH   2,000.00
A WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION   1,500.00
A-HOLD   1,000.00
A. DUNNER INC.   500.00
A.C.S.   1,000.00
A16   2,300.00
AAA   1,000.00
AAA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT   4,600.00
AAAA WORLD IMPORT-EXPORT INC.   1,000.00
For more of the list go to :http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q1/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html

Excerpted from:
Federal Election Commission

__-_________________________________________________________________

Excerpted from: A Project of Public Citizen - www.citizen.org
http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0008&SortOrder=campaignsource&StartRow=1

Hillary Clinton (D)




Total Raised: $88,507,181

Bundlers: 321

Lobbyist Bundlers: 18

Next 100 Bundlers

Name Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order State Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order Employer Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order Amount Raised Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order Cycle Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order Name Disclosed
By Candidate
Sort in Ascending Order Sort in Descending Order
Robert Reiner CA Castle Rock Entertainment Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
S. Daniel Abraham FL Slimfast Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Quincy Jones CA Quincy Jones Productions Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Warren E. Buffett NE Berkshire Hathaway Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 N
Robin Duke NY Population Action International Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Alan D. Cohn NY Smith Barney Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Mike Del Guidice NY Millennium Credit Markets Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Jane L. Rosenthal NY Tribeca Productions Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Craig M. Hatkoff NY Turtle Pond Publications Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Sue Bennett OK ONB Bank Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Heather Miller Podesta VA Heather Podesta & Partners LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 N
Joseph A. Power Jr. IL Power Rogers & Smith Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Mark Aronchick PA Hangley Aronchick Segel & Pudlin Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Peter Chernin CA News Corp. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
John Coale DC Coale Cooley Lietz Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
David Cohen UNKNOWN Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Lanny Davis MD Patton Boggs Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
John K. Delaney MD Capital Source Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Charles Francis Dolan NY Cablevision Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Calvin Fayard LA Attorney Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Gary Gensler MD Self Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Rhoda Glickman DC Self Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
John Graham NJ Fairview Insurance Agency Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Stephen L. Green NY SL Green Realty Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Brian L. Greenspun NV Greenspun Corporation Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Doug Haloftis TX Gardere Wynne Sewell Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Jay Jacobs NY Timber Lake Corp. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Claire Lucas DC National Stonewall Democrats Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Susan Magee DC None Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Lana Moresky OH UNKNOWN Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Joseph Paolino Jr. RI Paolino Properties Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Rosina L. Rubin NY Attitude New York Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Prakash Shah NJ First Mortgage Realty Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Jay Thomas Snyder NY HBJ Investments Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Sally Susman NY Estee Lauder Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Richard Ziman CA Arden Realty Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Daphna Ziman CA Edwards Entertainment International Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Mark Buell CA Self Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Betsy Cohn NY Retired Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Gabriel Guerra-Mondragon NY Puerto Rican Legal Def. & Educ. Fund Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Lorraine Hariton CA Beatnik Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Alex Heckler FL Shutts & Bowen Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Yashar Hedayat CA Goplin Group Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Fred Hochberg NY Milano, the New School of Management and Urban Policy Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Jill Iscol NY UNKNOWN Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Keith Kantrowitz NY Wall Street Mortgage Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Alan Kessler PA Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Christopher G. Korge FL Attorney Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Marc Lasry NY Avenue Capital Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Barbara F. Lee MA The Barbara Lee Foundation Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Nita Lowey NY U.S. House of Representatives Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Pat Maloney Jr. TX Law Offices of Pat Maloney Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Noah Mamet CA Noah Mamet & Associates LCC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Garry Mauro TX Attorney Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
John Merrigan DC DLA Piper Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Hassan Nemazee NY Nemazee Capital Corporation Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Susan Ness MD Greenstone Media LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Charles M. Parrish CA Self employed Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Alan J. Patricof NY Apax Partners Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Steven Rattner NY Quadrangle LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Steve Ricchetti DC Ricchetti Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Bill Rudin NY Real Estate Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Lynn Schenk MA Biogen IDEC, Incorporated Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Bernard Schwartz NY Loral Space & Communications Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Douglas W. Shorenstein CA Shorenstein Properties LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Walter H. Shorenstein CA Shorenstein Properties LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Stanley Shuman NY Allen & Company Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Kathy Sloane NY Brown Harris Stevens Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Roy Spence TX Omnicom Group's GSD&M Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Richard Sullivan DC Capitol Counsel LLC Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Richard Swann FL Swann and Hadley P.A. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Eleni Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis CA AKT Development Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Ted Waitt CA Gateway Computers Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Mark Weiner RI Financial Innovations Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Hugh Westbrook FL Retired Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Robert P. Zimmerman NY Zimmerman/Edelson Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Elizabeth Bagley DC UNKNOWN Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
John Catsimatidis NY Red Apple Group Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Nancy Parrish CA Homemaker Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Haim Saban CA Saban Entertainment Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Clifford Ronald Shows MS R & J Group Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Cheryl Saban CA UNKNOWN Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Elaine Schuster MA Homemaker Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Clarence Avant CA Interior Music Publishing Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), amount raised not listed 2008 Y
James J. Abdo DC Abdo Development Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Joyce Aboussie MO Aboussie & Associates Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Ali Ansari TX Byzantine Industries Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Ralph H. Baxter Jr. CA Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Tracy Bernstein DC Homemaker Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
James J. Blanchard MI DLA Piper Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
William A. Brandt Jr. IL Development Specialists Inc. Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Debbie Dudley Branson TX Law Offices of Frank Branson Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Scott Budnick Green Hat Films Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Jonathan C. Bunge IL Kirkland & Ellis Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Robin Canter Consultant Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Rashid A. Chaudary IL Raani Corporation Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Ellen Chesler NY University of New York Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Timothy A. Chorba DC Patton Boggs Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Jon Stevens Corzine NJ State of New Jersey Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y
Isabella De La Houssaye NJ NRG Energy Hillraiser (Hillary Clinton), raised at least $100,000.00 2008 Y

Next 100 Bundlers

A Project of Public Citizen - www.citizen.org
For more of this list go to:
http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0008&SortOrder=campaignsource&StartRow=1
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Brit Intelligence Furious Over Iran 'hoodwinking' CIA " Telegraph UK

"A senior British official delivered a withering assessment of US intelligence-gathering abilities in the Middle East and revealed that British spies shared the concerns of Israeli defence chiefs that Iran was still pursuing nuclear weapons." Telegraph UK


Iran 'hoodwinked' CIA over nuclear plans


By Tim Shipman in Washington, Philip Sherwell and Carolynne Wheeler
Last Updated: 2:13am GMT 10/12/2007

British spy chiefs have grave doubts that Iran has mothballed its nuclear weapons programme, as a US intelligence report claimed last week, and believe the CIA has been hoodwinked by Teheran.


 
 Iran 'hoodwinked' CIA over nuclear plans
Analysts believe that Iranian staff, knowing their phones were tapped, deliberately gave misinformation

The timing of the CIA report has also provoked fury in the British Government, where officials believe it has undermined efforts to impose tough new sanctions on Iran and made an Israeli atta

ck on its nuclear facilities more likely.

The security services in London want concrete evidence to allay concerns that the Islamic state has fed disinformation to the CIA.


The report used new evidence - including human sources, wireless intercepts and evidence from an Iranian defector - to conclude that Teheran suspended the bomb-making side of its nuclear programme in 2003. But British intelligence is concerned that US spy chiefs were so determined to avoid giving President Bush a reason to go to war - as their reports on Saddam Hussein's weapons programmes did in Iraq - that they got it wrong this time.


A senior British official delivered a withering assessment of US intelligence-gathering abilities in the Middle East and revealed that British spies shared the concerns of Israeli defence chiefs that Iran was still pursuing nuclear weapons. Excerpted.  For more of article go to The Telegraph UK at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/09/wiran109.xml

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Iranian Student Revolution, Photos From Behind The Iron Veil For All The World To See



TEHRAN UNIVERSITY ERUPTS! Hundreds of Protesters Smash Through Gates - Chant Against Regime! (Photos)

Tehran University Erupts!!

Excerpted From Gateway Pundit at: http://www.gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/

"Live Free Or Die!"
(ISNA)

Iranian human rights activist Banafsheh Zand Bonazzi passed on that the students said there were attacks on the Basij guards who attack them.
The AP questions that clashes took place however they were chanting against Ahmadinejad.

(ISNA)


(ISNA)

"Ahmadi-Pinochet, Iran will not become Chile!" the students shouted!
The AFP reported:

Hundreds of Iranian students held a new protest at Tehran University on Sunday, damaging the main gate to allow outsiders into the campus and denouncing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's news agencies reported.

The protesters chanted slogans against the president and carried banners calling for the release of three fellow students who have been held since May in a high-profile case, the Fars news agency and state-run IRNA reported.

"The students marched on the gate and damaged it, and this allowed several non-students to enter the campus. The students chanted slogans and carried protesting placards," IRNA reported.

"Ahmadi-Pinochet, Iran will not become Chile!" chanted the protesters, playing on the names of the Iranian president and late Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, Fars reported.

(ISNA)


(ISNA)


(ISNA)

It looks like there may be more than a couple of hundred students at the rally.

(ISNA)

Ardeshir Dolat has more on the protest from his contacts in Iran.
Via Banafsheh Zand Bonazzi

UPDATE: Here are more photos that the students have sent out from the protests earlier today. Their signs were translated by Banafsheh:

"The University is the last bastion of freedom"


"We condemn the widespread oppression of independent student groups and publications" -Students of the Free (Azad) University


"Girls dormitory is not women’s prison"


"People, think! We were once some of the luckiest people in the world; what happened to us? Search for your dreams under the rubble and do not sit for death to come."

UPDATE 2: Michael Ledeen has video from the protest at The Corner- Obviously, there were more than "a couple of hundred" protesters at the university.

UPDATE 2: Winston has a big roundup from the Iranian news.
And, Fleeting Perusal has more on the protest against the regime.

UPDATE 3: The Daily Mail is reporting that the students were stoning the police during the protest.
Posted by Gateway Pundit 12/09/2008


All photos credited and  excerpted from Gateway Pundit at :http://www.gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/


Iranian Students Protest at University ...

TEHRAN, Iran —  Hundreds of Iranian students expressed their anger over a government crackdown on activists in a protest Sunday at Tehran University, the second such demonstration in less than a week, witnesses and state radio said.

One witness, Mehdi Arabshahi, said the protest lasted more than two hours as students rallied against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's hardline administration.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Federal Sexual Harassment and RICO Lawsuit Defendents IPA and Sen. Hillary Clinton.


"But it’s the sexual harassment case that provides the most compelling reason for Hillary to return the money. After all, I thought she was supposed to be a champion for women. Judging from the alleged victims at IPA, they could have used one."

"While John Burgess and IPA’s upper management, including Director of Sales, Dan Drugan; Director of Business Coordination and Director of Recruiting and collections, Rich Lubicz; Director of Business Coordination and Senior Executive, Scott Kollins; Director of Inside Sales, Tony Jones; and Hybrid Director, Keith Link, were the worst perpetrators of sexual harassment, the harassment at issue in this case was by no means limited to these men. Indeed, women alleged that they were harassed by men within all levels of the company, from the owner and upper management, to business coordinators and the janitor. No department at IPA was free from harassment. Men in the business coordination, inside sales, outside sales, hybrid, recruiting, collections, and the accounting departments harassed women and women in all of these departments were subjected to harassment."

Excerpted from ReverseSpin .com and
Hillary and a ‘gauntlet of abuse’
Posted on 04.30.07 by dancurry at:

http://www.reversespin.com/?m=200704


International Profit Associates 2007 Campaign Contributions Excerpted from CampaignMoney.com
CHUNG, MICHAEL
CHICAGO, IL 60614
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/CON $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 04/18/2007
BURGESS, TYLER P
WAUCONDA, IL 60084
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/DIR $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 04/18/2007
Ryan, Tom
LITTLETON, CO 80127
International Profit Associates/Dir $1,000 HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT - DEMOCRAT P 06/17/2007
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/MAN $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 04/18/2007
Steinberg, Gregg
NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
International Profit Associates/Pre $2,300 MELISSA BEAN FOR CONGRESS - DEMOCRAT P 06/30/2007
Steinberg, Gregg
NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
International Profit Associates/Pre $2,300 MELISSA BEAN FOR CONGRESS - DEMOCRAT G 06/30/2007
Steinberg, Gregg M
NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
International Profit Associates/Pre $2,300 HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT - DEMOCRAT P 09/05/2007
Steinberg, Gregg M
NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
International Profit Associates/Pre $5,000 ALL AMERICA PAC P 05/15/2007
BREWER, DONNA
HAWTHORN WOODS, IL 60047
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/VIC $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 04/18/2007
http://www.campaignmoney.com/finance.asp?type=io&cycle=08&criteria=International+Profit+Associates

Also see more of Tyler Burgess, International Profit Associates for 2007



John R. Burgess 2007 at CampaignMoney.Com
  (What no money contributed to Hillary's Presidential Campaign?)

(http://www.campaignmoney.com/finance.asp?pg=5&type=in&criteria=Burgess&prevpage=9&cycle=08
Burgess, John
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
IPA/Owner $2,300 LAUZEN FOR CONGRESS - REPUBLICAN P 09/28/2007
Burgess, John
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
IPA/Owner $2,300 LAUZEN FOR CONGRESS - REPUBLICAN G 09/28/2007
Burgess, John E.
PAHRUMP, NV 89048
Retired/Retired $500 RON PAUL 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE - REPUBLICAN P 09/28/2007
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/MAN $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 04/18/2007
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
IPA/MGR DIR $1,000 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE - REPUBLICAN P 07/10/2007
continued (next page on campaignmoney.com)
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
IPA $2,000 KENNEDY FOR SENATE 2012 - DEMOCRAT P 02/09/2005
BURGESS, JOHN R
N BARRINGTON, IL 60010
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATION $250 FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 03/02/2005
Burgess, John R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
IPA/Mgr Dir $1,000 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 03/08/2005
John R. Burgess of International Profit Associates  Campaign Contributions in 2006
Name/Location Employer/Occupation $ Amount Contributed Contributed To Primary/
General
Date
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
 -- $2,000 KENNEDY FOR SENATE 2012 - DEMOCRAT P 05/23/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R
N BARRINGTON, IL 60010
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATION $250 FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 06/07/2005
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES $26,000 DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 06/14/2005
BURGESS, JOHN R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATION/CE $2,000 BOB CASEY FOR PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 11/14/2005
Burgess, John R
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
International Profit Associate/Dire $10,000 MISSOURI DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT P 11/14/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/MAN $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT P 01/25/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES/MAN $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 01/25/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
 -- $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT P 05/07/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
 -- $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 05/07/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
 -- $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT P 05/07/2006
BURGESS, JOHN R MR
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
 -- $2,100 MCCASKILL FOR MISSOURI - DEMOCRAT G 05/07/2006
Burgess, John R Mr.
BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089
Intl. Profit Associates/Manager $500 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE - REPUBLICAN P 01/04/2006


Scott Kollins Contribution List in 2006

Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar
Amount
Date Primary/
General
Contibuted To
Kollins, Scott R
GURNEE, IL
60031
International Profit Associates/Dir $1,800 09/07/2005 P HILL PAC
KOLLINS, SCOTT R
GURNEE, IL
60031
$1,800 06/15/2005 G FRIENDS OF HILLARY - Democrat
KOLLINS, SCOTT R
GURNEE, IL
60031
IPA $1,900 04/16/2005 G FRIENDS OF HILLARY - Democrat
http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/scott-kollins.asp?cycle=06

More of the Reverse Spin article from above here:
We’ve reported previously that despite her enthusiastic endorsement from the National Organization for Women (NOW), Hillary Clinton apparently has no problem associating with a company accused of widespread sexual harassment in a federal lawsuit.

We got our hands on a recent filing in that lawsuit and it is apparent this is not your garden variety sexual harassment case. In a September 2006 response brief (click on document above) to a motion for summary judgment, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) outlined its case against International Profit Associates (IPA) of suburban Buffalo Grove, Il., outside Chicago.

IPA’s management, led by John Burgess, created a culture at IPA where sexual harassment flourished. IPA’s senior managers harassed women with impunity, sending a signal to lower-level managers and employees that they could do the same. Given the tone set by IPA’s senior management, it is not surprising that sexual harassment at IPA was rampant in all departments and at all levels of the company. Women at IPA routinely had to endure a gauntlet of abuse, ranging from sexual solicitations and physical harassment, to sexual comments and offensive sexual materials. Based on the extensive record of harassment presented in this case, IPA is not entitled to a finding that as a matter of law, the sexual harassment that occurred at the company was insufficiently severe or pervasive to survive summary judgment.

IPA, in court documents, has denied the allegations.


Clinton took the NOW endorsement while holding some $150,000 in campaign contributions from executives of IPA. The company and its founder, convicted felon John Burgess, have become so radioactive in the political world that politicians across the country have returned tens of thousands of dollars, according to a New York Times story last year. The Times says Clinton took more than $150,000 from IPA and its agents while the online database Open Secrets pegs the amount at about $130,000, making the firm her 12th largest career donor. We’ve seen no online or published evidence that Clinton has returned the money. In the Times story last year a spokewoman said the matter was under review.


The association between Hillary and IPA was more than casual. Even if she returned the money tomorrow, it doesn’t change the fact that Hillary attended a company awards dinner in 2004 while the sexual harassment case was pending, according to a Jan. 10, 2004 article titled “Company’s founder has a past of highs and lowsin the Daily Herald (link not available).

The company’s annual “Celebration of Success” dinner always draws top politicians. Sen. Hillary Clinton was this year’s spotlight attendee. A Clinton spokesman described Burgess as a “family friend” in a recent Associated Press article.

In addition to the sexual harassment complaint, IPA has a long history of complaints from small and medium sized businesses who say they were scammed. The Better Business Bureau has given IPA an “unsatisfactory record” because of reoccurring complaints, 417 in the last three years, and the Illinois Attorney General’s office has a pending fraud investigation.

Excerpted from ReverseSpin.com at: http://www.reversespin.com/?m=200704

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush Gets It! After 8 years of Clinton/Reno Pseudo Justice, Child Porn, Terrorism and Illegal Immigration Crimes Are Getting Prosecuted

"The number of defendants prosecuted for child-pornography offenses nearly tripled, from 594 in President Bill Clinton's last year in office to 1,549 in fiscal 2006. " The Washington Post


 Excerpted from The Washington Post at: http://www.infragard.net/press_room/articles/article_101707.htm


 

Justice Dept.'s Focus Has Shifted

Terror, Immigration Are Current Priorities

By Dan Eggen and John Solomon

Washington Post Staff Writers

Wednesday, October 17, 2007; A01

The Justice Department under the Bush administration has retreated from prosecutions of mobsters, white-collar criminals, environmental crimes and traditional civil rights infractions, new department data show.

As part of a series of policy shifts that have greatly transformed the administration of federal justice, the department has strongly emphasized immigration and terrorism-related investigations. It has also devoted new attention to areas important to conservative activists, such as sex trafficking and obscenity, according to the department's own performance and budget numbers.


Such dramatic changes form a backdrop as the Senate Judiciary Committee considers today the nomination of former federal judge Michael B. Mukasey to be President Bush's third attorney general.


From 2000 to 2006, for example, there were large drops in the number of defendants related to environmental offenses (down 12 percent), organized crime (38 percent), white-collar crime (10 percent), bank robbery (18 percent) and bankruptcy fraud (46 percent), according to Justice Department statistics provided this week to The Washington Post. Money-laundering prosecutions related to drugs were also down nearly 25 percent, while the number of drug cases overall was stagnant.


There were simultaneous jumps in prosecutions related to immigration (up 36 percent), weapons cases (87 percent), official corruption (15 percent), and, most dramatically, terrorism and national security cases (876 percent). Indeed, Justice Department funds devoted to counterterrorism programs in Washington have tripled since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Department officials say the surge in resources for national security and terrorism probes, in particular, reflects the intense administration efforts to prevent another attack. But the number of terrorism-related defendants has been relatively small: Prosecutions peaked at 818 in 2003 and fell to 635 by 2006, and most of these were not for terrorist acts or plans.


The result is a department far less focused on the mob bosses, drug kingpins and bank robbers who have dominated much of its history, even as new FBI studies show a substantial rise in murders and other violent crimes over the past two years. The change has been so marked that, in a speech to a police group this week, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III signaled a desire to reinvigorate the department's emphasis on traditional crime-fighting.


"We are realizing that national security is as much about reducing the number of homicides on our streets as it is about reducing the threat of terrorism," Mueller said Monday in New Orleans at a convention of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. "Today, in pockets around the country, we are seeing the first steady increase in street-level crime since 1993. As a result, we must view criminal threats differently than we did in the immediate aftermath of September 11."


Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said some categories of crime have been key priorities of the Bush administration, including terrorism, illegal gun possession and child exploitation. He also noted that overall prosecutions for all crimes are at an all-time high.

"Clearly, since September 11, the administration's top priority has been counterterrorism," Carr said. "That's reflected in the creation of the National Security Division and the vast resources we've devoted to investigating and prosecuting terrorism cases. . . . The department's commitment to all areas of federal prosecution is shown through the president's funding requests to Congress, which have shown steady increases for all department divisions over the past six years."


The statistical trends examined in this article are based on numbers provided by the Justice Department's Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The trends are similar, but not identical, to recent findings by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), an independent research organization at Syracuse University that tracks monthly Justice Department prosecution statistics.


Several favorite conservative causes saw marked increases in prosecutions during the first six years of the Bush administration. The number of defendants prosecuted for child-pornography offenses nearly tripled, from 594 in President Bill Clinton's last year in office to 1,549 in fiscal 2006. Likewise, obscenity prosecutions more than tripled, from eight defendants in 2000 to 26 last year.


While traditional civil rights cases fell, the number of defendants prosecuted for human-trafficking-related crimes rose from just two in 2000 to 65 six years later.


Perhaps most strikingly, the department's statistics show that Justice is now in large part an immigration enforcement agency: More than 19,000 defendants were charged with immigration violations in federal district courts in 2006, surpassing every other category except drug crimes. The data compiled by TRAC indicate that federal magistrates handled and disposed of an additional 18,000 immigration cases in 2006.

Carr said the surge in immigration cases was largely caused by demands from Southwestern states to beef up enforcement along the border with Mexico. "This is a targeted -- rather than national -- emphasis in the states that are facing incredible immigration challenges," he said.

Asked about the shifts, David Laufman, a former senior Justice Department official who prosecuted some of the nation's most prominent terrorism cases in Northern Virginia, said that the FBI, after the Sept. 11 attacks, turned increasingly to state and local law enforcement agencies to pick up some of the slack in non-terrorism areas.


He also said that a portion of the increased immigration prosecutions stemmed from a strategic decision by the administration to use such cases to detain or deport terrorism-related suspects when there was not enough evidence of other crimes.


"Prevention and disruption of terrorism was a paramount priority, and immigration prosecutions became one of the government's most favored tools for neutralizing people believed to pose a security threat, especially when the government lacked admissible evidence that the individual had committed a terrorism offense," Laufman said.


 

"... The department's environmental crimes section also experienced a 44 percent spike in its budget, and its staffing reached a record 40 full-time prosecutors in 2007. Yet, by 2006, the number of defendants prosecuted for environmental offenses had fallen by 12 percent.

Budgets for the 93 U.S. attorney's offices also grew, by more than 40 percent over the past six years, although many federal prosecutors say they remain short-staffed in many areas.

Gene R. Voegtlin, legislative counsel for the police chiefs' organization, said the federal government's retreat from local crime-fighting has greatly frustrated local law enforcement agencies. Federal assistance has fallen from $2.5 billion in 1997 during the Clinton administration to $1.1 billion in the Bush administration's 2008 budget proposal, according to the police group.]
For more go to : The Washington Post at http://www.infragard.net/press_room/articles/article_101707.htm

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Small business owners are frustrated by Hillary’s continued refusal to turn away International Profit Associates funds" letter to Hillary Clinton For President

"We, the undersigned small business owners from across the country are deeply offended that you continue to accept campaign contributions from top officials of a business consulting company, International Profit Associates (IPA), Buffalo Grove, IL., that defrauded us. "


Hillary’s swiss cheese “vetting” 
Excerpted from Reverse Spin


Posted on 09.26.07 by dancurry @ 8:33 am


On Meet the Press last Sunday, Hillary Clinton proclaimed that new vetting procedures had been been put in place to prevent her from taking money from sleaze merchants like Norman Hsu.


If you think you’ve heard that line before, you are right.

The spokeswoman for Mrs. Clinton, Ann Lewis, said Mrs. Clinton was not aware of Mr. Burgess’s background when he held fund-raising affairs for her in 2000 and 2003, nor did she know whether other prominent Democrats had rejected contributions. She said that Mrs. Clinton’s vetting procedures have been strengthened since the senator’s appearance at I.P.A.

That paragraph appeared in a May 2006 article in the New York Times focusing on questionable contributions to Clinton from Illinois-based International Profit Associates, a business consulting company run by a convicted criminal that is beset by fraud allegations and a massive federal sexual harassment lawsuit.


Small business owners across the country, frustrated by Hillary’s continued refusal to turn away IPA funds, have written her this letter today. The small business owners were victimized by IPA’s fraud and are suing IPA in a federal racketeering lawsuit pending in Chicago.

Hillary Clinton for President
4420 North Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA. 22203

Dear Senator Clinton:
We, the undersigned small business owners from across the country are deeply offended that you continue to accept campaign contributions from top officials of a business consulting company, International Profit Associates (IPA), Buffalo Grove, IL., that defrauded us. As we struggle in federal court via a civil racketeering lawsuit to recover the thousands of dollars this company took from us illegally, you continue to use political donations that might have come directly from our pockets.


We also are appalled because you accepted the money amid dark clouds of fraud allegations, a criminal past by the company’s founder, and one of the largest sexual harassment lawsuits ever filed by the federal government.

We are trying to fight back against this company and you, Senator Clinton, are enabling it. We ask that you immediately donate to charity the more than $150,000 the New York Times says you’ve accepted from IPA’s top officials, a figure that includes a ride on IPA’s corporate jet and a donation from a high school age son of an IPA official.

Surely, now, in the wake of the Norman Hsu scandal, your political staff will turn up the background we’ve known about for some time, including:


?
IPA is being sued by the federal government’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for widespread sexual harassment. In a New York Times article May 7, 2006 titled, “Rubbing Shoulders with Trouble, and Presidents,” EEOC lawyer Diane Smason called the allegations “probably the most egregious” ever filed by the agency’s Chicago office. She said the investigation found that “sex harassment is the standard operating procedure for this company.” That case is pending in U.S. District Court.



?
The Illinois Attorney General’s office has acknowledged publicly that it is investigating IPA for alleged fraud.



?
The Better Business Bureau says IPA has an “unsatisfactory record” based on reoccurring complaints that total 427 in the last three years. The BBB has issued “alerts” in various states to warn businesses that IPA was soliciting work there.



?
The company founder, John Burgess, is a convicted criminal, according to numerous published reports. He was convicted of attempted grand larceny and of soliciting a 16-year-old prostitute, those reports state. He was disbarred as a lawyer in New York state in July 1987 for “failing to answer charges which involved perjury, larceny, a conviction for patronizing a 16-year-old prostitute, possession of drugs and engaging in a pattern over a six-year period of lies and deceit,” according to The Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of New York state. Burgess also is named as a key defendant in the sexual harassment lawsuit.



?
The company’s attorney, Myron “Mike” Cherry, also a contributor of yours, has been identified in published reports as “Individual H” in the Illinois criminal indictment of businessman Antoin “Tony” Rezko. Cherry has acknowledged in published reports that he was the conduit for some of the IPA campaign contributions.


?
Already, politicians across the country have returned donations from IPA because of the company’s checkered past. Illinois Senator Barack Obama, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle and former Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager are among those who have returned contributions from IPA.


We have made our fraud allegations in a federal racketeering lawsuit pending in U.S. District Court in Chicago.


Mrs. Clinton, we see from published reports that you have identified yourself as a champion for women’s rights and an advocate for small business owners. We cannot fathom, in light of those self-labels, how you could possibly accept campaign contributions from a company accused by the federal government of sexually harassing scores of women and one that has left behind a long trail of fraud complaints from small business owners. Do you believe the 114 women who were allegedly sexually harassed at IPA are not telling the truth about that harassment? Do you believe the Better Business Bureau is wrong? Do you think the state Attorney General is unjustified in her investigation of IPA?


We believe this is our concern because the campaign contributions you continue to accept came from the money that we believe was taken from us illegally. We do not believe you should continue to further your political career with such tainted cash.


We are not singling you out in this request. We plan to make the same request to other public officials who continue to accept and hold IPA-related campaign contributions. We wrote you first because you are running for President and certainly should be setting an example for other politicians.


Sincerely,


Amari Company, Inc., Amherst, NH.
Amazing Productions, Inc., Tamarac, FL.
Precision Painting and Decorating, Inc., Elmhurst, IL.
All About Construction, Inc., Fort Myers, FL.
Capital Removal, Gold River, CA.
BBQ Island, LLC., Gilbert, AZ.
Compsolution VA, Inc., Richmond, VA.
JRP Construction, LLC., Yuma, AZ.
Evco Commercial Construction, Corp., Lake Elsinore, CA.
Gunnison Metal Shop, Inc., Gunnison, CA.
Captains Select Seafood, Minneapolis, MN.
MSI Redimix Inc., Mesquite, CA.
Joseph E. Clouse, Inc., Lehigh Acres, FL.
Kyles Discount Stuff, McPherson, KS.
Dames Air, LLC., Warrenton, MO.
Home Theater Design Group, Carrollton, TX.
Gigs Inc., Tewksbury, MA.
Cool Access LLC., Mesquite, TX.
Philipsburg Electric & Supply, Inc., Philipsburg, PA.
Gilbert-American Companies, Rockwall, TX.
Hinsdale Sales and Rental, Inc., Hinsdale, NH.
Hitech Fire Detection, Inc., Houston, TX.

All Credit to Reverse Spin at: http://www.reversespin.com/?p=622
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »