About Me

Name:Gabrielle Cusumano
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

You Decide: In New Video Did Bhutto Take A Bullet?

New video
 

(See Compilation of Videos and Stills  From Other Sources Below)


New Video Shows Bhutto Taking Bullet
Published: Dec. 31, 2007 at 7:46 AM


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Dec. 31 (UPI) -- A videotape released Monday shows former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto being struck by a bullet seconds before an explosion in Rawalpindi.

Bhutto was at a political rally Thursday and was videotaped standing up through the sunroof of her bomb-proofed car. Her hair and scarf can be seen moving as three shots rang out and she slumps back into the vehicle, CNN reported.

A second later, a bomb exploded and killed 23 other people.

Excerpted from UPI at
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrac k/Top_News/2007/12/31/new_video_shows_bhutto_taking_bullet/3587/

New Angle Shows Benazir Bhutto Struck By Bullet.
New footage of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination shows the impact of the bullet which lifted her hair and shawl and contradicts the Pakistan govts version of events.
Excerpted from: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117


Bhutto's hair and headscarf fly upward on the left side of her head just before she collapses  into her vehicle.



UPDATED: Mobile pictures -
Benazir was defintely shot dead before the Blast


 Excerpted from:

New Images updated below: Considering all the commotion and fuss created by the government of Pakistan saying the called that Benazir Bhutto was not hit by the three bullets but instead she hit her head on some lever of the sunroof. Last night I was contacted by a person via Orkut who had uploaded these images on his profile (now he has taken them off) he was offering to share his video to the extent that he gave his cell number in Islamabad, since his dial up did not permit transferring this heavy file.

On contacting him today he claimed that he was a PPP supporter and his party had instructed him not to share this with anyone. Later when a news reporter tried contacting him, his cell phone was switched off. I have two images to share with you which were initially taken off his Orkut Profile

The first image clearly shows Benazir Bhutto standing upright in the car through the sunroof waving to the crowd

benazir-before-shot-was-fired-thumb.jpg

The next image is just after the gun shots which were fired from the left but moments before the bomb blast. Here we see Benazir Bhutto not on the sunroof of the car most likely already shot and injured slumped inside

benazir-after-shot-was-fired-thumb.jpg

I sadly do not have the original video, though I tried very hard to get it. A source was in direct contact with the cameraman who actually shot the video and later uploaded the screen captures to show that he means serious business. He claimed to be in the security detail with Benazir Bhutto was riding on her car barely five minutes earlier but had to jump off as she exited the Liaquat Bagh venue. He was finding it difficult to upload the 56MB video file online so was ready to allow someone to help him get it readily available. Today morning he said that his cell phone was ringing off the hook with people clambering in the hunt for the video, hence forth he turned his cell phone off and had even removed the images from his Orkut profile.

NEW IMAGES UPLOADED BELOW

Today evening my source was been able to find the other two images that were initially uploaded to the cameramans profile,

The third image in this series shows the crowd and the cameraman suspects the white hooded fellow to be the actual bomber

benazir-bhutto-assassin-picture-thumb.jpg

This last image is taken 15 seconds later after the bomb blast showing total carnage

benzir-bhutto-after-bomb-blast-thumb.jpg

One thing is for sure that she was shot before the bomb blast hit her and the shockwave had nothing to do with it (as speculated by the Government representatives. It must be noted that the Government of Pakistan or some tom-dick-n-harry agency has in effect scared away the cameraman from sight and he is no longer in contact, but I am proud to say that the truth will always prevail.

DISCLAIMER: The images are the actual images taken off his orkut profile and the explanation and the captions and text appearing on the images were all done by him.

Excerpted from

http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/2007/12/29/mobile-pictures-benazir-was-defintely-shot-dead-before-the-blast/

More Actual Video Below

Excerpted From WWW. Live Leak.com at:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117

Posted: 9 hours ago , by: barnesy
A Forensic Look At Bhutto's Death.
The argument is still raging over exactly how Benazir Bhutto died. Pakistan's government claims she was killed by the force of a suicide bomb but her supporters say the opposition leader was clearly shot

Posted: 12 hours ago , by: bellava
Inside Bhutto's Car Shows Bloody End
Images have been released of the armored vehicle Benazir Bhutto was in prior to her assasination. Allegations of a possible cover-up have arisen and violent protests have killed dozens throughout the country since her death Thursday. (Dec. 30)

Posted: 22 hours ago , by: barnesy
New Angle Shows Benazir Bhutto Struck By Bullet.
New footage of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination shows the impact of the bullet which lifted her hair and shawl and contradicts the Pakistan govts version of events.
Excerpted from:http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ll_850_1198767117


And Lastly From UTube:





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For The Record: "Bill Clinton Won't Attend NSC Meetings" Says His Wife, Wannabe Prez Hillary.


"Sen. Hillary Clinton said today her husband will take on the same responsibilities as traditional presidential spouses, with no access to National Security Council meetings." ABC news


Bill Clinton Won't Attend NSC Meetings in a Hillary White House  (Excerpt)

December 29, 2007 2:41 PM

ABC News' Jonathan Greenberger reports: If she makes it to the White House, Sen. Hillary Clinton said today her husband will take on the same responsibilities as traditional presidential spouses, with no access to National Security Council meetings.

"I think he would play the role that spouses have always played for presidents," said Clinton, in an exclusive interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos. "He will not have a formal, official role, but just as presidents rely on wives, husbands, fathers, friends of long years, he will be my close confidante and adviser as I was with him."

The candidate said having President Clinton participate in National Security Council meetings "wouldn't be appropriate," and in a crisis situation – like the one faced by President Bush this week after the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto – President Clinton would not sit in on discussions with his wife’s national security team.

But Sen. Clinton did say she expects the former president to play a role as an informal adviser to the White House staff.

"I'm going to expect that people in my administration will turn to him and rely on him, as we do with many people who have experience," she said.

Throughout her presidential campaign, Clinton has repeatedly said she would send President Clinton around the world on the United States’ behalf as a roving ambassador... 
Excerpted: For more go to: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/12/bill-clinton-ba.html
____________________________________________________________________________

Photo and comments excerpted from Free Republic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945700/posts

Where my attention to the above "news article" was originally captured by this photo.

Caption: "He doesn't need to go to National Security Council meetings... he can just send his nest of Chinese spies like John Huang and Moctar Riady. " Bon mots


19 posted on 12/29/2007 5:04:04 PM EST by Bon mots

All credit for above statement and photo posting to Bon mots at Free Republic. com at :http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945700/posts

and this thought on the subject of  Bill Clinton Won't Be Attending  NSC Meetings in a Hillary White House 

"These people are on LSD"


5 posted on 12/29/2007 4:40:13 PM EST by Lancey Howard also on FreeRepublic.com

All credit for this thought above to Lancey Howard on FreeRepublic.com.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Pakistan's middle-class was ready for a move back toward democracy" according to an NPR Report in April 2007.

Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:28 PM

 "Ahmed Rashid, author of the best-selling Taliban and Jihad, argues that Musharraf has misjudged his country's mood, that Pakistan's middle-class is ready for a move back toward democracy and that they're ready for Musharraf to step down." Fresh Air on NPR 

 

  • Audio for today's show will be available at approx. 3:00 p.m. ET

ALL CREDIT TO NPR AND FRESH AIR AND TO HOST TERRI GROSS

By Ahmed Rashid
Thursday, March 22, 2007; A21

LAHORE, Pakistan -- In the rapidly unfolding crisis in Pakistan, no matter what happens to President Pervez Musharraf -- whether he survives politically or not -- he is a lame duck. He is unable to rein in Talibanization in Pakistan or guide the country toward a more democratic future.

Since March 9, when Musharraf suspended the chief justice of the Supreme Court, Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, public protests have escalated every day -- as has a violent crackdown by the police and intelligence agencies on the media and the nation's legal fraternity.

The legal convolutions about Chaudhry's dismissal boil down to one simple fact: He was not considered sufficiently reliable to deliver pleasing legal judgments in a year when Musharraf is seeking to extend his presidency by five more years, remain as army chief and hold what would undoubtedly be rigged general elections.

Musharraf's desire to replace Chaudhry with a more pliable judge has badly backfired. After just 10 days of protests, lawyers around the country have made it clear to the senior judiciary that they will not tolerate further legal validations for continued military rule or tolerate Musharraf remaining as president. At least seven judges and a deputy attorney general have resigned in protest.

Across the country, in law offices, in the media, among the opposition parties and other organized sections of civil society, the feeling is growing that Musharraf will have to quit sooner rather than later. After eight years of military rule it appears people have had enough.

Moreover, Musharraf is losing control of three key elements that have sustained his rule but are now either distancing themselves or turning on him completely. The first is the ruling Pakistan Muslim League Party, which has acted as the civilian appendage to the military but faces an election and knows that going to bat for the unpopular Musharraf will turn off voters. Party leaders and cabinet ministers are already distancing themselves from him.

The second element is the country's three intelligence agencies, which are at loggerheads over control of Musharraf, Pakistan's foreign policy, its political process and the media. Military Intelligence and the Inter-Services Intelligence are military agencies, while the largest civilian agency, the Intelligence Bureau, is now run by a military officer. Ironically, Inter-Services Intelligence, the most powerful agency in the country, has been the moderate element urging Musharraf to open up the political system to the opposition parties. The other two agencies are the hard-liners and are urging Musharraf to adopt even tougher measures.

The third loss for Musharraf has been the unqualified international support he has received since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Anger in the U.S. Congress and media, and particularly among members of the Republican Party, toward Musharraf's dual-track policy in Afghanistan -- helping to catch al-Qaeda members but backing the Taliban -- is making it difficult for President Bush to continue offering Musharraf his blanket support.

That was the tough-love message that Vice President Cheney delivered to Musharraf in Islamabad last month: Unless Musharraf goes after the Taliban, the Bush administration can no longer protect him.


Any loss of Western support will be critical to the army, which is on an arms-buying spree and depends on annual U.S. military aid of about $300 million. Musharraf has balanced the pro- and anti-American factions in the army's officer corps, but if both sides see him as a lame duck, unable to deliver the goods or stabilize the country, their support will dwindle.


Musharraf is now too weak to pursue policies that could keep his back-stabbers in check, restore his credibility at home and abroad, and pursue his agenda of remaining in power for the next five years.

It is far better that he revert to the promise he made when he seized power in 1999: to return the country to democracy. His best course of action would be to say he is not a candidate for president, hold free and fair elections, allow the return of exiled politicians, restore full political rights and gracefully depart with his legacy, which is considerable, intact.


It is in the interest of the United States to support such an exit strategy. The military can no longer counter the phenomenal growth of Islamic extremism in Pakistan through offensives alone. What the country needs is greater political consensus and a popularly elected government, and to replace the extortions of the mullahs with the return of day-to-day parliamentary politics. Excerpted: For more go to The
Washington Post  at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/21/AR2007032101786_pf. 
All credit to The Washington Post
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Pakistan's uncertain year ahead
Ahmed Rashid
By Ahmed Rashid, Lahore

Gen Pervez Musharraf
'The key issue is what political alliances Gen Musharraf will broker'

Pakistan is moving into a new year that will be critical for the country's future political direction.

The government says everything is on schedule for the re-election of President Pervez Musharraf and general elections by the end of 2007.

Yet Pakistanis are still gripped with severe bouts of uncertainty and few believe the government's assurances.

The unpredictability of what will actually happen is already affecting business confidence, say economists.

Islamic extremist groups, the mainstream Islamic parties and exiled national leaders are more interested in a showdown with Gen Musharraf to curtail his powers, or remove him from office, than an election.

Fortunately for the military, the opposition parties are deeply divided among themselves.

The reason for the uncertainty, that will last all of next year, is that the decision will be made by one man - Gen Musharraf himself - because in Pakistan there is no institutionalised, well-worn democratic succession process and the constitution is a mere piece of paper that can be altered by decree.

After seven years of Gen Musharraf and the military, people are tired of the army and looking for change


The government scenario elaborated to me by leading figures of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League (PML) says that next autumn Gen Musharraf will likely go for an endorsement from the present National Assembly and provincial assemblies as president for the next five years.

Rumours of a deal

He will then dissolve parliament, set up a three-month caretaker government that will hold free and fair elections and then go for a second endorsement as president in 2008.

Most PML politicians do not expect him to relinquish his role in the military, in which case he will remain as both army chief and president.

However the decisions all lie with Gen Musharraf and his handful of military advisers rather than the ruling party or the prime minister - hence so much uncertainty.

Protests against Gen Musharraf
'Islamic groups are looking for a showdown with Gen Musharraf'
The key issue is what political alliances Gen Musharraf will broker for the election.

After his recent outbursts against extremism and the need for people to vote for moderates, rather than religious extremists, the long-running speculation that the army has struck a deal with the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and its leader in self-imposed exile, Benazir Bhutto, are rife.

Both sides deny any deal, despite the political buzz.

However Gen Musharraf has made it clear that the return of Benazir Bhutto is out of the question. So too, he says, is the return of the prime minister he deposed, Nawaz Sharif, the exiled leader of another faction of the PML.

So why should the PPP cut a deal when its leader will not be allowed to campaign or stand for elections?

If there is a compromise and a deal with the PPP, it would mean the military breaking of its alliance with the Islamic parties that presently rule the provinces of Balochistan and the North West Frontier.

It is something that many in the US and western Europe are desperate to see happen and would clearly applaud.

The problem is that the PML and its leader Chaudry Shujjat Hussain, in particular, see the PPP as a major threat to their monopoly on power at the centre and in the largest province Punjab.

Concrete assurances

Moreover the logic of a deal with the PPP would mean that the military would also have to cast their lot with smaller secular Baloch and Pashtun nationalist parties in Balochistan and the NWFP - which the army is loathe to do because they oppose the continuation of military rule.

Again Gen Musharraf will have the last word and it is likely that he will only declare his political alliances at the last moment, thus fuelling continued uncertainty about the future.

The best option for a genuine step forward to democratisation would be for Gen Musharraf to announce that he would stand as a civilian president, that genuinely free and fair elections would be held and the future government would be freely determined on the election outcome.

Benazir Bhutto
'Speculation is rife that the army has struck a deal with Benazir Bhutto'
To gain public confidence he would also need to pledge that the elections would genuinely empower parliament and the next prime minister and that he and the army would take a back seat.

That would need concrete assurances such as a pledge to remove over 1,000 army officers who presently occupy key civilian posts in the government, economic institutions, media and the universities.

Thus the polls would be a transformative election moving the country slowly towards full and genuine civilian rule.

After seven years of Gen Musharraf and the military, people are tired of the army and looking for change.

Moreover only a genuine civilian government could begin the attempt to start a reconciliation process with all the alienated, angry elements of society such as the Baloch nationalists and the Pashtun extremists in the tribal agencies bordering Afghanistan.

Is such a transformative election likely?
 Excerpted: For more go to :

All Credit To the BBC NEWS
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6211639.stm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Top Secret Iraqi Files Found: Saddam Really Did Have WMDs"


LoftusReport.com ^ | October 25, 2007 | John Loftus.

 http://www.loftusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/loftus-wmd-final.pdf

We live in an age of documents. There are no more secrets, only deferred disclosures.

Saddam Hussein's secret documents are measured by the shelf-mile and stored inside a secure but dusty facility near U.S. Central Command Headquarters in Doha, Qatar, and in several subsidiary sites.



Armed guards protect the unread dossiers. Three shifts of two hundred translators each work around the clock. Perhaps 5% of these captured documents have been studied so far, but their contents are about to shatter much of the conventional wisdom concerning Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.


The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at the disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The "Bush lied, people died" chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq.


Each side is more than a little bit wrong abou Saddam's WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.


(Excerpt) Read more at loftusreport.com ...



Another Report in full from FrontPage Magazine.Com:

Shattering Conventional Wisdom About Saddam's WMD's



FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | November 16, 2007 | John Loftus  Excerpted

 

We live in an age of documents. There are no more secrets, only deferred disclosures. Saddam Hussein's secret documents are measured by the shelf-mile and stored inside a secure but dusty facility near U.S. Central Command Headquarters in Doha, Qatar, and in several subsidiary sites. Armed guards protect the unread dossiers. Three shifts of two hundred translators each work around the clock. Perhaps 5% of these captured documents have been studied so far, but their contents are about to shatter much of the conventional wisdom concerning Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

The absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned at the disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously suspected. The "Bush lied, people died" chorus has insisted that Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere, buried under the sand dunes of Iraq.[1] Each side is more than a little bit wrong about Saddam's WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened to it.

The gist of the new evidence is this: roughly one quarter of Saddam's WMD was destroyed under UN pressure during the early to mid 1990's. Saddam sold approximately another quarter of his weapons stockpile to his Arab neighbors during the mid to late 1990's. The Russians insisted on removing another quarter in the last few months before the war. The last remaining WMD, the contents of Saddam's nuclear weapons labs, were still inside Iraq on the day when the coalition forces arrived in 2003, but were stolen from under the Americans’ noses and sent to Syria. Syria is one of eight countries in the world that never signed a treaty banning WMD, and now is the storehouse for much of what remains of Saddam's WMD Empire. This was the target of the recent Israeli air strike.

There are only a few people in the world who were close to being right all along about Saddam's WMD. One of them was Yossef Bodansky, a noted intelligence analyst and former director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare.[2] On page 496 of Bodansky’s book, "The Secret History of the Iraq War" he makes the astounding assertion that:

".. .The United States had long known that Saddam moved virtually all production capabilities to Libya and Sudan somewhere between 1996 and 1998. Subsequently, in the summer of 2002, with Tehran's consent, the residual chemical weapons production capabilities were shipped to Iran..."[3]

In other words, is Bodansky is right (and he usually is) as late as 2002, Saddam still retained a CW production capability and then sold it to the Iranians on the eve of war.[4] The CIA has now acknowledged that they had a highly-placed spy in Saddam's cabinet who agreed that Saddam had gotten rid of all of his production facilities, but the super spy claimed that Saddam still retained a lethal stockpile of finished chemical weapons in early 2003. The latter information, about the remaining CW stockpile, turns out to have been incorrect, but neither the CIA nor their Iraqi super spy knew it at the time.[5]

After Saddam's brother-in-law Kemal Hussein defected to Jordan in the mid 1990's and exposed some (but not all) of the numerous Iraqi WMD programs, Saddam started over from scratch on WMD production, using a small and secret cadre of new program leaders. Among the newly-disclosed documents are Saddam's actual tape recordings of the meetings of this special group for WMD.

The National Security Agency has confirmed[6] that the tapes are authentic and that the voiceprints are unquestionably those of Saddam and his elite WMD advisers. The CIA's super-spy, excluded from this working group, apparently did not know that it even existed. (His voice appears nowhere on the tapes.) He simply could not have known what Saddam was doing with his WMD programs, let alone with his CW stockpile.[7]

Most of the audio recordings of the secret WMD group are undated, as the CD on which they were found is a compilation of tapes of various WMD meetings stretching over a decade. But their tone is consistent not only with other recorded WMD meetings but with the newly-released document intelligence archives, many of which are revealed here for the first time through the assistance of author and geopolitical analyst Mr. Ryan Mauro.[8] Mauro cautions that "the recently declassified documents have the potential to shatter any conclusions or judgments about what Saddam Hussein's regime was up to. Until all these documents are translated and analyzed, it is premature to reach any conclusion."

Translating shelf miles of documents, however, may take decades. In the meantime, enough of Saddam's secret files have been translated to illustrate one clear trend over time: through the time of Hans Blix and the run-up to the invasion, Saddam had absolutely no intention of destroying his WMD.

In the last year of his regime, Saddam was in fact still trying to expand his chemical weapons capability. In January 2002, his advisors discussed research into a precursor for Sarin nerve gas.[9] In September 2002, for example, only seven months before the war, Saddam's Military Industrial Commission approved the illegal production of the precursor chemicals used to make Tabun nerve gas.[10] Four days later, another office discussed plans to import a banned compound, phosphorus pentasulfate. The UN had required Iraq to prove that it had destroyed all of its stocks of this chemical, which is a precursor for VX nerve gas. Instead, they were importing more of it.[11] In October 2002, Saddam's Director of Planning ordered more than forty tons of various chemicals which, when mixed together, would make Zyclon B – the poison gas used by the Nazis to kill millions of Jews during the Holocaust.[12] Saddam's scientists appear never to have met a poison gas they did not like.

The secret planning for banned chemical weapons in 2002 was no last-minute decision of desperation on the eve of war. Rather, it typified Saddam's long, well-thought-out plan to deceive the UN – an ongoing project that went back more than a decade. For example, Saddam's intelligence service sent out a memo in 1997 ordering his staff not to destroy any WMD but to conceal prohibited materials, "hide equipment and documents....make sure that labs are cleaned of any traces of chemical or biological substances."[13] That was the real Saddam: hide the WMD documents, clean up the tell-tale evidence.

Beginning in 1998, Saddam’s staff went into overdrive to conceal their illegal WMD programs: "The researchers [sic] that cannot be declared and that is related with the previous prohibited programs of WMD and how to make sure that information about these researchers will not leak to the outside world."[14] Files from 1999, marked “Top Secret”, confirm that the Iraqi army had a "chemical platoon" that was undergoing training in every form of illegal chemical weapons.[15] By 2001, the regime ensured that their chemical platoons had mobile shower vehicles for decontamination.[16] Similarly, the production of mobile labs (which the Duelfer report concluded had ended in 1997) were still being manufactured in 2002.[17]

There can be no doubt that instead of destroying his WMD in 1991, Saddam had a clear intent to revive his WMD production, to expand it and to hide it from the UN inspectors as late as 2002. So where did the stockpile of chemical weapons go in 2003?

John Shaw knew. He had seen this kind of scam before. This, as the Texans say, was not his first rodeo. John (Jack) Shaw, was a distinguished civil servant who was pushed out of the US Department of Defense shortly after the 2004 elections. He was the point man for tracking the mass of conventional weapons and prohibited technology that was found in Iraq. He did his job well, apparently too well for the comfort of some government officials.

As Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Shaw’s job was to track illegal sales of conventional weapons all over the world, but particularly in Iraq. Shipping arms to Iraq was a direct violation of the UN embargo order and US law. There was a good bit of that going on in the run-up to the war. Saddam had a lot of money and European arms merchants had a lot of weapons to sell, often with a wink and a nod from their home governments. Shaw unearthed evidence of a million tons of high explosives and evidence of high tech weaponry - and also, in the course of this work tracking conventional weapons, the scent of WMD.

As an example of Shaw’s work on illegal conventional weapons sales to Iraq, US troops discovered after the invasion, and reported through his office, that, despite the UN embargo, Saddam had been able to purchase the latest Roland II anti-aircraft missile launcher, a very effective French weapons platform for shooting down helicopters. The date of manufacture stamped on the Rolands was January 2003.

French arms manufacturers, in other words, had been selling to Saddam right up to the opening of the war. They later explained that France had sold the Roland to Syria, and that Syria was not covered by the embargo. The French claimed to be shocked that Syria had sold the Roland to their fellow Ba'athists in Baghdad. It should be noted that, for more than a year prior to the French sale the Israeli press had been publicly exposing Syria as an arms front for Saddam.

It is also hard to credit the Russians' claim that they were similarly shocked to discover that a corrupt Ukrainian arms dealer had sold scores of Moscow's high tech Kornet anti­tank missiles to Saddam. The Kornet is the only hand held missile in the world that can penetrate the super-heavy armor of the American main battle tank, the Ml Al Abrams. Two of the Abrams were knocked out of action by Kornets in Iraq. It was Shaw's unit that tracked the Kornet. "Its provenance was obvious," Shaw said, "and the Russian silence in response to our exposure was deafening."

In terms of WMD, newly released documents from Saddam’s government suggest that the Russians knew exactly what they were doing when it came to hiding illegal weapons. While Russian scientists were working hand-in-hand with Iraqi scientists on WMD, Russian spies inside CENTCOM were warning Saddam how to avoid detection from the UN inspectors. Saddam's secret files also mention an Associated Press reporter who passed information on how the UN inspection teams were being trained.[18] The Russian Ambassador himself handed over many of America's secret war plans.[19]

Most importantly, Saddam’s intelligence services credit Russia’s critical help in misleading the UN into thinking that Iraq was in compliance with the resolution paragraphs requiring destruction of its WMD. “We have succeeded in a few of the UN paragraphs…we have won Russia, ahhh…we have convinced Russia by way of generous accounts.” [20]

It should be noted that France, Russia and China were the three largest exporters of Saddam's oil before the war. They were also, according to the documents now being released, the three nations most involved with illegal weapons sales to Saddam. The oil profits, of course, were huge, and according to minutes from secret meetings, Saddam's intelligence service knew how to dangle the bait of illegal oil profits to, in their words, "commit some nations like France, China, Russia and Japan to economical agreements that make the implementation of the smart sanctions to have negative effect to the interests of these nations."[21] In English the word for this is “bribery” – on a huge scale.

Excerpted: For More go to:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=F715A709-2614-4EA5-967C-F6151F94A364

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bill & Hillary Greatest Hits (Visuals From Creative Bloggers)

"We could let you see her files, but then we'd have to kill you."

 


34 posted on 12/19/2007 7:18:41 PM EST by Maceman Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941954/posts


 

To:

26 posted on 12/16/2007 11:36:14 AM EST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald) Excerpted from Free Republic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940272/posts


 

 

Case #1:


11 posted on 12/19/2007 8:03:29 PM EST by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942022/posts


To:
19 posted on 12/19/2007 8:30:47 PM EST by CASchack
Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942029/posts


How did the Clintons become multi-millionaires with no visible means of support?


33 posted on 12/15/2007 10:10:29 PM EST by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.) Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940117/posts


To:
Her support slipped?

Ewwwww.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
8 posted on 12/19/2007 3:27:55 PM EST by Bon mots Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941877/posts

To:
I made that Camealot image ages ago, and nobody ever 'got it' until I hyphenated it.

People told me that I mis-spelled "Camelot" and nobody ever seemed to notice anything fishy about it. There are actually two modifications to Monica over the original... her left hand has been moved too. :-)
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
37 posted on 12/18/2007 12:47:57 PM EST by Bon mots  Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941155/posts

To:
Bill wouldn't lie or anything, right? Nah.


162 posted on 12/18/2007 6:02:23 PM EST by silent_jonny (Huckabee—THE DNC’S CHOICE) Excerpted from FreeRepublic.com at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941079/posts 

And lastly just for the hell of it....
To:
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
26 posted on 12/18/2007 9:06:24 PM EST by don-o (Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever) Excerpted from FreeRepubic.com at:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941476/posts

All of the above were excerpted from recent blog postings.
All credit goes to the wonderful imaginations and creative genius posters at:
http://www.freerepublic.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) involved in raising funds to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President.

"

According to a fundraising web site for the Senator, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) activists are involved in raising funds from 100 Dollars to 2300 Dollars to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President. " Asian Tribune


Excerpted from The Asian Tribune
at: http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699

 

The LTTE is heavily involved in fund raising for Hilary Clinton in New Jersey

By Walter Jayawardhana


Los Angeles, 13 December, (Asiantribune.com):
Well known activists of a banned terrorist group in the United States are involved in the fund raising activities of the US Democratic candidate Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton.


According to a fundraising web site for the Senator, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) activists are involved in raising funds from 100 Dollars to 2300 Dollars to help elect Senator Clinton as the next United States President.


New Jersey residents have expressed the fear, that the LTTE or the Tamil Tigers could flush supporters with millions of dollars, to buy influence over the next possible President of the United States of America by infiltrating into democratic fund raising machine.


An email distributed by a female activist, Pat Pathmakumar for the group under the name “Tamils for Clinton” has appealed to contribute for the Clinton fund by sending checks to her or a man named Ram Ranjan, a man who organized the LTTE Heroes day meeting in New Jersey last year. Ranjan has publicly admitted he raised funds for the LTTE front, the Tamil Rehabilitation Organization (TRO).


The terrorist group, that introduced innovative methods like suicide jackets to many terrorist groups in the world, is listed as a foreign terrorist group by the State Department and the US Federal police , the FBI has alleged that the group had offered to them millions of dollars as bribes to lift the ban. The group is alleged to be using bribes to buy influence in India, Malysia and Sri Lanka. The money is being earned mostly by fraudulent business, credit card scams, drug running , voluntary fund raising and extortions of the Tamil Diaspora, according to a recent report of the JanesDefense weekly.


According to the Clinton website a leading LTTE activist, who came to live in New Jersey in 1994, called Ram Ranjan is one of the fund raisers of the Clinton campaign. Several others who are connected with him are also listed among the fund raisers.


He has earlier admitted that he had raised funds for the Tamil Tigers front organization called Tamil Rehabilitation Organization (TRO) which has raised funds purportedly for humanitarian purposes but actually diverted those funds for terrorist activities from many countries in the world.

The State Department has identified the TRO as a front organization of the LTTE and it is banned in many countries in the world.


An year ago he told a New Jersey newspaper called Star Ledger that although he supported the TRO it is not connected with the terrorist group LTTE.

The Star Ledger reported, “ … ……… he serves as state coordinator of the Tamil Rehabilitation Organization, which raises money for medical services, schools and orphanages and the victims of the LTTE, not the LTTE, Ranjan said.”


The Star Ledger
newspaper interviewed Ranjan an year ago after he was involved in organizing a LTTE heroes day commemorating meeting with accepted leaders of the LTTE in the US as speakers, local residents said. Pro LTTE website the Tamil Net said that the function started by hoisting LTTE separatist flag. The meeting was organized by a front organization of the LTTE, the South Asian Community Association.


The Sri Lankan Tamil group held the memorial meeting to eulogize dead Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) fighters including suicide bombers as heroes but told the New Jersey newspaper "Star-Ledger" they did not have any connections with a terrorist group.

The group called South Asian Community Association or SACA with Ranjan as an organizer caught attention after it rented an auditorium of the south Brunswick middle School in New Jersey, USA for a memorial to eulogize the dead LTTE fighters including those suicide bombers who targeted unarmed civilians and raised the flag of the LTTE and sang the anthem of the group on December 02 2006.


The meeting was addressed by known leaders of the LTTE in the United States, Visuvanadan Rudrakumaran and Dr. Naglingam Jeyalingam. Some have complained that the meeting held at this government school which was claimed by the Tamil Net website to be 500 also raised funds for the banned terrorist group.


The Star-Ledger
newspaper of New Jersey who published two consecutive news articles about the group who rented the Brunswick school reported that , "
 For more of article go to:http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699 


Excerpted from the - Asian Tribune - at : http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8699 


Excerpted from Lanka Newspapers at: http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2007/5/14621.html

LTTE provides innovative terror tactics to other terrorist groups - The USA
Saturday, 5 May 2007 - 9:37 PM SL Time

In its Country Reports on Terrorism submitted to the US Congress the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that the Sri Lankan terrorist group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) led other terrorist groups in the world by giving them many innovative ideas.

`Many LTTE innovations,` said the report, `such as explosive belts, vests, and bras, using female suicide bombers, and waterborne suicide attacks against ships, have been copied by other terrorist groups.`

U.S. law requires the Secretary of State to provide Congress, by April 30 of each year, a full and complete report on terrorism with regard to those countries and groups meeting criteria set forth in the legislation. This annual report is entitled Country Reports on Terrorism. Beginning with the report for 2004, it replaced the previously published Patterns of Global Terrorism.

In its South and Central Asian section the report said, while the Maosists in Nepal signed a peace agreement in contrast the LTTE continued with its terrorist attacks.

`In Nepal and Sri Lanka, terrorism carried out by the Maoists and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) posed a severe challenge to those governments,` the report said.

The report said, `On an encouraging note, in November, the Maoists signed a peace agreement with the Government of Nepal that provided, under certain disarmament conditions, that the Maoists could be admitted into an interim government.

In Sri Lanka, the LTTE continued attacks including targeted assassinations against political and military opponents.`

The Secretary of State told the Congress that, the LTTE financed itself with contributions from the Tamil Diaspora in North America, Europe, and Australia, and by imposing local `taxes` on businesses operating in the areas of Sri Lanka under its control. Using this money, LTTE weapons were purchased on the international black market or captured from the Sri Lankan Army.

The following is the full report in the Sri Lanka section:

`The 2002 cease-fire between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, continued to erode amidst numerous violations and escalating military engagement between the LTTE and government security forces. The Sri Lankan Army remained deployed across the country to fight the insurgency. The paramilitary Special Task Force (STF) police were deployed both in the east and in strategic locations in the west.

`The LTTE conducted a campaign of targeted assassinations against political and military opponents. This included the April assassination attempt of Sri Lanka Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka and the assassination of the Army Third-in-Command; the August 12 assassination of the Government of Sri Lanka`s Secretariat for the Coordination of the Peace Process, Deputy `Director Keteshwaran Loganathan; and the December 1 suicide bomber`s attempt on the life of Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the President`s brother.

The Karuna faction, a dissident faction of the LTTE, conducted its own assassination campaign against the LTTE and pro-LTTE civilians in the east.

`Following the assassination of Foreign Minister Kadirgamar in August 2005, the government enacted emergency regulations giving arrest power to members of the armed forces, who were required to turn suspects over to the police within 24 hours. Individuals arrested under the emergency regulations may be detained for up to one year. Under these regulations, 148 persons were arrested; most have already been released. A revised Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), enacted in December, strengthened these powers.

`The LTTE financed itself with contributions from the Tamil Diaspora in North America, Europe, and Australia, and by imposing local `taxes` on businesses operating in the areas of Sri Lanka under its control. Using this money, LTTE weapons were purchased on the international black market or captured from the Sri Lankan Army. Many LTTE innovations, such as explosive belts, vests, and bras, using female suicide bombers, and waterborne suicide attacks against ships, have been copied by other terrorist groups.

In general, the LTTE did not target U.S. citizens or assets, limiting attacks to Sri Lankan security forces, political figures, civilians, and businesses. However, two suicide bomb attacks on VIP motorcades in Colombo occurred within half a mile of the U.S. embassy on roads frequently travelled by Embassy employees.

`Sri Lankan cooperation with the FBI has resulted in arrests of persons charged with material support to terrorist groups. The Sri Lankan government cooperated with U.S. efforts to track terrorist financing, although no assets were identified." (For more go to link below)
Excerpted from Lanka Newspapers at: http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2007/5/14621.html

Source(s)
• defence.lk

More Background:


03:37 From: chllptr
Views: 1,243
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzs076RDJyI&mode=related&search=


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Contributions By Employer For Hillary Clinton For President" Federal Election Commission

Excerpted from:
Federal Election Commission


CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER
 for Hillary Clinton for President

      PO Box 101436
      Arlington, Virginia   22210
NOTE: Address IS Different than previously reported

FEC Committee ID #: C00431569

This report contains activity for a Primary Election

Report type: April Quarterly

For election on 11/04/2008

This Report is an Amendment

Filed 11/12/2007

EMPLOYER SUM
NO EMPLOYER WAS SUPPLIED   2,139,070.98
'VICTIMS OF TORTURE'   500.00
01:CONCEPT LLC   250.00
1305 S RIVER MEADOWS DR   1,000.00
1906 SPRUCE STREET ASSOC. LP   4,600.00
1919 LLC   250.00
1ST CREDIT BANK   6,900.00
2 CHICKS IN COMPANY   4,600.00
2 JPL ASSOCIATES LLC   4,600.00
20TH CENTURY FOX   2,300.00
20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP   2,300.00
2130 PARTNERS   250.00
26 FILMS LLC   9,200.00
2HB   9,200.00
2ND PARAMUS PINES LLC   2,300.00
3 ARTS ENTERTAINMENT   9,200.00
30SEVEN DESIGN   250.00
3H TECHNOLOGIES   2,000.00
3M   250.00
5.12 CONSTRUCTION   4,600.00
66M DEVELOPERS LLC   4,600.00
85 BROADS UNLIMITED LLC   4,600.00
910 SOUTH 111TH PLAZA   250.00
A & E PROPERTIES   2,000.00
A GLIMMER OF HOPE FOUNDATION   2,000.00
A MANO INC.   2,000.00
A MOSES & ASSOCIATES   2,300.00
A TOUCH HOME HEALTH   2,000.00
A WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION   1,500.00
A-HOLD   1,000.00
A. DUNNER INC.   500.00
A.C.S.   1,000.00
A16   2,300.00
AAA   1,000.00
AAA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT   4,600.00
AAAA WORLD IMPORT-EXPORT INC.   1,000.00
For more of the list go to :http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q1/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html

Excerpted from:
Federal Election Commission

__-_________________________________________________________________

Excerpted from: A Project of Public Citizen - www.citizen.org
http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0008&SortOrder=campaignsource&StartRow=1

Hillary Clinton (D)